From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <belen.barros.pena@intel.com>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
	by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F5EE00B72
	for <toaster@yoctoproject.org>; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 09:27:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26])
	by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Mar 2014 09:27:43 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,704,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="503950258"
Received: from irsmsx104.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.159])
	by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Mar 2014 09:27:40 -0700
Received: from irsmsx106.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.8.26]) by
	IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.224]) with mapi id
	14.03.0123.003; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:27:39 +0000
From: "Barros Pena, Belen" <belen.barros.pena@intel.com>
To: "toaster@yoctoproject.org" <toaster@yoctoproject.org>
Thread-Topic: RFC - showing 0 values in tables
Thread-Index: AQHPRSJ5V4Qgjvh/7kCmXl7n6cxABA==
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:27:39 +0000
Message-ID: <CF5218F9.4040C%belen.barros.pena@intel.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
x-originating-ip: [10.237.224.30]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RFC - showing 0 values in tables
X-BeenThere: toaster@yoctoproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web based interface for BitBake <toaster.yoctoproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/options/toaster>,
	<mailto:toaster-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/toaster>
List-Post: <mailto:toaster@yoctoproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:toaster-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/toaster>,
	<mailto:toaster-request@yoctoproject.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:27:45 -0000
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <7DB5AB8A389564448A158EEFA4DD2CA7@intel.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

It has been brought to my attention that, since a value 0 is not the same
as value none, we should maybe show 0 values in the task performance
information.=20

Although I understand that none is not 0, I still think that, in the case
of task performance information, if the value is 0 I don't need to care
about it, since the task is not consuming any resources. If I don't need
to care about it, why are you showing it to me? I am of the minimalistic
kind.

Having said that, I am happy with both options. I have made the necessary
changes and pushed them to

bbarrosp/show-zeros

so that you can see how it looks like. If you feel strongly one way or
another, please speak out.

Thanks!

Bel=E9n