From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8081AC433EF for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 14:22:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236904AbhL2OV7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Dec 2021 09:21:59 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33156 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233907AbhL2OV7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Dec 2021 09:21:59 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0771DC061574 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 06:21:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id b186-20020a1c1bc3000000b00345734afe78so11841952wmb.0 for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 06:21:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind.com; s=google; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:references:in-reply-to; bh=q8UZ6arbycHE2CpKfOtq3yBPUu7dFT+MHraGDQp/KL0=; b=KOo4+1bIF+A/8kWDWP/6IXxMMf2mNVGLBYTLw4yIhMvm1kM0vhYmoUTqUQD9PBE2tW 5MCTPgb7A2oXemp0RcfgN5gM/TAFRvG0rmBKmvBX6U3rmE5N1uoA1zoHAq08xGP2hMyJ Q1PuiEc1GivJRW1Eg7+qsxcagCk4cBnYG4pJe9LAsIin4M7hqosHG21YUKFbPSDQ67qr EPEXxMA0isnaYgNpX3M2saUMihn5h6vTrWIAYtEkqjaGdr4EeXw6iZidVV2uhnu6ddLC G2XZLDerriy7wQdykq3Qwm1zmssU0dzfYGh/7cI5lXHr7+eB8kveNkCX/PfRQytl4hdP jgtQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to; bh=q8UZ6arbycHE2CpKfOtq3yBPUu7dFT+MHraGDQp/KL0=; b=sb1HK4u7JwnD4BEKELS+ZHq9LFDbQNkuu4eQaRIicO4tQ61oXRc66hNI8omVQ68Dlm Fz8JQo14LgukNNp9KeBe2O2gQEEvpcMH9YdNW2jS7a8BImul0BIf4WmALaGZ7XJY3rU/ aN+Nop7nJLwIuxPbOAlIRQ6IpMotqMJ/DYxr/oWcyIIOaVE9a+szIecwwFpEgwms0Y6+ YM2un6XEcjf8emFzhzwi7C8gK+F7Fo5wV4Ia7xQiAAJnViIx0Uo7FqVDlHq8UM9WzzP9 tHfcQ9kp1LF4whAqwNKPVYF+cO+hEgPQyQvi8V5z7KliMDJbNxnEoP8dW0d6pDhEcTtp 2SDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531dzGoBRDC7fZ3gYvvIJfH1YSgXLlpDeHrXTDIcsJXq9gBeGPhG odk38oJaAGvkGdJOLcB7aG+iMA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwqJYuDbGgeExE6uJjo2irj9A65mDHBMBh94TYL5GDvrIzvc4/eecCPjbmiaavxciOo3KCSag== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:219a:: with SMTP id e26mr22502273wme.136.1640787717631; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 06:21:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2a01:cb1d:312:bc00:141e:cf13:f68c:6ab6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p11sm23579285wru.99.2021.12.29.06.21.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Dec 2021 06:21:57 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 15:21:57 +0100 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] receive-pack: interrupt pre-receive when client disconnects From: "Robin Jarry" To: "Robin Jarry" , "Junio C Hamano" Cc: =?utf-8?q?=C3=86var_Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0_Bjarmason?= , , "Nicolas Dichtel" , "Jan Smets" , "Stephen Morton" , "Jeff King" References: <20211110103525.171066-1-robin.jarry@6wind.com> In-Reply-To: <20211110103525.171066-1-robin.jarry@6wind.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi, do you have any remarks on this patch? Is it going in the right direction? Should I send a non-RFC? Happy holidays all. Thanks!