From: "Engel, Amit" <Amit.Engel@Dell.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] nvmet_tcp: fix header digest verification
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:47:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO1PR19MB48856AA2F52E022418DEA773EE839@CO1PR19MB4885.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4a71a194-c715-a38d-6b3e-560eae714451@grimberg.me>
In nvmet_tcp_try_recv_pdu:
1. After kernel_recvmsg, 'queue->offset' is equal to 'sizeof(struct nvme_tcp_hdr)'
2. update queue->left = hdr->hlen - queue->offset + hdgst and 'goto recv'
3. after recvmsg , the offset is greater than the digest.
So , In this case offset != hdr->hlen
This will lead to nvmet_tcp_verify_hdgst to always pass, which
Thanks
Amit
Internal Use - Confidential
-----Original Message-----
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2021 8:53 PM
To: Engel, Amit; linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmet_tcp: fix header digest verification
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
> One of our tests found that
> With the current code,
> recv_digest == exp_digest even if the pdu header digest is being
> modified (synthetically) For example:
> In case that pdu header digest is changed to 0xffffffff, recv == exp
> == 0xfffffff, and nvmet_tcp_verify_hdgst returns 0 - which is wrong
Not sure I follow. Can you describe in which case the passed offset !=
hdr->hlen?
> Internal Use - Confidential
Is this confidential?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-25 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20211019113307.31852-1-amit.engel@dell.com>
2021-10-19 12:18 ` [PATCH] nvmet_tcp: fix header digest verification Sagi Grimberg
2021-10-20 15:43 ` Engel, Amit
2021-10-20 17:53 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-10-25 8:47 ` Engel, Amit [this message]
2021-10-26 15:34 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-10-27 6:50 ` Engel, Amit
[not found] <20211027064927.20452-1-amit.engel@dell.com>
2021-10-27 7:09 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-10-27 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CO1PR19MB48856AA2F52E022418DEA773EE839@CO1PR19MB4885.namprd19.prod.outlook.com \
--to=amit.engel@dell.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.