From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 5E761E003D7; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 21:45:20 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [104.47.34.85 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0085.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.85]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6731AE0030B for ; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 21:45:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uievolution.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-xevo-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=qMKzryiU+FGSlAPJDlFrodBNnT40jibRhyyRVNYzXbY=; b=rI7iQwm6OTrYBWJ2lb944n3JObn6d22Ai8ZCiyFY8p5DDAA+C/5Da5Y/n9lw+ySmStbMrZ28JuhY23BltGF2st3FhK62iWEZY0ozWoGHpk/LsTslXq45+QToVRgi4i6uHx10Yj8/T/bfG5SJ6cpPoK2+kqI6RYJ6MA1wAODpVgQ= Received: from CY1PR0101MB1594.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.163.139.13) by CY1PR0101MB1594.prod.exchangelabs.com (10.163.139.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.860.13; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 05:29:53 +0000 Received: from CY1PR0101MB1594.prod.exchangelabs.com ([10.163.139.13]) by CY1PR0101MB1594.prod.exchangelabs.com ([10.163.139.13]) with mapi id 15.01.0860.026; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 05:29:53 +0000 From: Takashi Matsuzawa To: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Thread-Topic: pkg_postinst shell? Thread-Index: AQHSeRJXqfLOGUVvzEKgC07itriPAKFQgOcE Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 05:29:52 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=tmatsuzawa@xevo.com; x-originating-ip: [118.238.252.194] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3914976d-9a57-4ab5-58a2-08d448d104b2 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001); SRVR:CY1PR0101MB1594; x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1PR0101MB1594; 7:70bjOECnmhYmKDwJhARSuY+eZ71WBLJk1ZIMsdVzIhFpNqx+w/OSmFKIilJ48qhzPIaU7k5tJ3h4/VrvetMw+qP0CMnPOr4JO9b+VZ2O0En0649goXkc/YMx4aPP350p3lhHek0iF5fGOXNdfvXMS/D2FuHCk+9ytk0LpKZyQYRwTcR23BfZZFxEJ3LmL0PlsGPZdYc/RMm4AmHRVOHdr6PsHl67dMwjMlS1fwW91YuFd2hfM/TSLJNPmz5TOsJmISfoB2dD1kT49wzsjg7tu++0kIrPMVvZq2pSe8LhSw4OQCrOq15YjCHHKuOzp3iaTzRUGeTNATLmzYS4o1ymw9tFG+T9l4eRG7X8cu1YEI2YM2YUsqwU8qOhtgez6O9Oe2bD2hDHyF8ts9QbmnUuHrIv4Jpdl1e7vUOEAvRJvVmawp7zQuXbgrV9IdXqBwWM/id94XGw3fdlEZtdx9Pmrg== x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6041248)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(6072148); SRVR:CY1PR0101MB1594; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1PR0101MB1594; x-forefront-prvs: 0203C93D51 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(7916002)(39450400003)(377454003)(199003)(189002)(3660700001)(110136003)(53936002)(7736002)(74316002)(9686003)(99286003)(2906002)(19627405001)(450100001)(5640700003)(2351001)(25786008)(55016002)(66066001)(5660300001)(7696004)(7116003)(2501003)(101416001)(2900100001)(68736007)(3900700001)(92566002)(54356999)(2950100002)(6916009)(189998001)(107886002)(76176999)(6606003)(97736004)(106116001)(106356001)(122556002)(8936002)(81156014)(229853002)(81166006)(1730700003)(54896002)(6306002)(77096006)(102836003)(3846002)(6116002)(50986999)(6506006)(33656002)(8676002)(86362001)(38730400001)(6436002)(3280700002)(105586002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR0101MB1594; H:CY1PR0101MB1594.prod.exchangelabs.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: xevo.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: xevo.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Jan 2017 05:29:52.7992 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: e0a7ca1f-2458-4cd6-a7c7-d733c07495ab X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR0101MB1594 Subject: Re: pkg_postinst shell? X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 05:45:20 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CY1PR0101MB1594FE408435CBAB28FDAB9AB64B0CY1PR0101MB1594_" --_000_CY1PR0101MB1594FE408435CBAB28FDAB9AB64B0CY1PR0101MB1594_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello. It seems the below patch fixes this problem. systemd.bbclass: don't block on service restart https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/134317/ (By the way, it may related to my question in another thread, but which is = the convenient way to apply this kind of patches to my local build system?) ________________________________ From: Takashi Matsuzawa Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 11:58 AM To: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: pkg_postinst shell? Hello Yocto. I am debugging my recipe, which uses pkg_postinst but does not seem to work= as expected. It runs fine without $D detection. However, if I try to run it at first boot (skipping with exit 1 if $D is no= t empty), the board boot seems to hang. I think error (syntax error, etc.?) happening when it is run on the board, = but package manager. I doubt it is caused by non-existence of '#!/bin/sh' in my script but I am = not sure since I am still trying the builds again and again. i) Regarding the posttest script execution, is there log available so that = I can look into (instead of writing out log file by myself from within my s= cript)? I do not seem to find it in temp folder of my recipes's working di= rectory. ii) Is '#!/bin/sh' always necessary? iii) What happens with pkg_postinst_PN_append? If it is defined without pk= g_postinst_PN, it still works and executed? If i) is true what about '#!/b= in/sh' in this case? If you have qucik suggestions, it is a great help. --_000_CY1PR0101MB1594FE408435CBAB28FDAB9AB64B0CY1PR0101MB1594_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello.
It seems the below patch fixes this problem.

systemd.bbclass: don't block on service restart
https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/134317/


(By the way, it may related to my question in another thread, but which is = the convenient way to apply this kind of patches to my local build system?)

From: Takashi Matsuzawa
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 11:58 AM
To: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: pkg_postinst shell?
 

Hello Yocto.
I am debugging my recipe, which uses pkg_postinst but does not seem to= work as expected.

It runs fine without $D detection.
However, if I try to run it at first boot (skipping with exit 1 if $D = is not empty), the board boot seems to hang.
I think error (syntax error, etc.?) happening when it is run on the bo= ard, but package manager.

I doubt it is caused by non-existence of '#!/bin/sh' in my script but = I am not sure since I am still trying the builds again and again.

i) Regarding the posttest script execution, is there log available so = that I can look into (instead of writing out log file by myself from within= my script)?  I do not seem to find it in temp folder of my recipes's = working directory.

ii) Is '#!/bin/sh' always necessary?

iii) What happens with pkg_postinst_PN_append?  If it is defined = without pkg_postinst_PN, it still works and executed?  If i) is true w= hat about '#!/bin/sh' in this case?

If you have qucik suggestions, it is a great help.



--_000_CY1PR0101MB1594FE408435CBAB28FDAB9AB64B0CY1PR0101MB1594_--