All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: drop duplicated ecc check for vega10
@ 2020-09-29  4:55 Guchun Chen
  2020-09-29  6:05 ` Zhang, Hawking
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Guchun Chen @ 2020-09-29  4:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: amd-gfx, alexander.deucher, Hawking.Zhang, Dennis.Li, Tao.Zhou1,
	John.Clements
  Cc: Guchun Chen

The same ECC check has been executed in amdgpu_ras_init for vega10,
prior to gmc_v9_0_late_init.

Signed-off-by: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c | 13 +++----------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
index 3dddbc60fe3d..f72acb7cfea3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
@@ -1193,21 +1193,14 @@ static int gmc_v9_0_late_init(void *handle)
 	r = amdgpu_gmc_allocate_vm_inv_eng(adev);
 	if (r)
 		return r;
-	/* Check if ecc is available */
+
+	/* apply DF parity workaround */
 	if (!amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev) && (adev->asic_type == CHIP_VEGA10)) {
 		r = amdgpu_atomfirmware_mem_ecc_supported(adev);
 		if (!r) {
-			DRM_INFO("ECC is not present.\n");
 			if (adev->df.funcs->enable_ecc_force_par_wr_rmw)
 				adev->df.funcs->enable_ecc_force_par_wr_rmw(adev, false);
-		} else
-			DRM_INFO("ECC is active.\n");
-
-		r = amdgpu_atomfirmware_sram_ecc_supported(adev);
-		if (!r)
-			DRM_INFO("SRAM ECC is not present.\n");
-		else
-			DRM_INFO("SRAM ECC is active.\n");
+		}
 	}
 
 	if (adev->mmhub.funcs && adev->mmhub.funcs->reset_ras_error_count)
-- 
2.17.1

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: drop duplicated ecc check for vega10
  2020-09-29  4:55 [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: drop duplicated ecc check for vega10 Guchun Chen
@ 2020-09-29  6:05 ` Zhang, Hawking
  2020-09-29  6:09   ` Chen, Guchun
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zhang, Hawking @ 2020-09-29  6:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chen, Guchun, amd-gfx, Deucher, Alexander, Li, Dennis, Zhou1,
	Tao, Clements, John

[AMD Public Use]

Although we unified check ecc capability to ras_init, we still need to query the ecc capability here to apply the vega10 specific workaround. So we don't need to call the atomfirmware helper again, but leverage adev->ras_features to decide apply the workaround or not.

Regards,
Hawking

-----Original Message-----
From: Chen, Guchun <Guchun.Chen@amd.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 12:56
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; Zhang, Hawking <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>; Li, Dennis <Dennis.Li@amd.com>; Zhou1, Tao <Tao.Zhou1@amd.com>; Clements, John <John.Clements@amd.com>
Cc: Chen, Guchun <Guchun.Chen@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: drop duplicated ecc check for vega10

The same ECC check has been executed in amdgpu_ras_init for vega10, prior to gmc_v9_0_late_init.

Signed-off-by: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c | 13 +++----------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
index 3dddbc60fe3d..f72acb7cfea3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
@@ -1193,21 +1193,14 @@ static int gmc_v9_0_late_init(void *handle)
 	r = amdgpu_gmc_allocate_vm_inv_eng(adev);
 	if (r)
 		return r;
-	/* Check if ecc is available */
+
+	/* apply DF parity workaround */
 	if (!amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev) && (adev->asic_type == CHIP_VEGA10)) {
 		r = amdgpu_atomfirmware_mem_ecc_supported(adev);
 		if (!r) {
-			DRM_INFO("ECC is not present.\n");
 			if (adev->df.funcs->enable_ecc_force_par_wr_rmw)
 				adev->df.funcs->enable_ecc_force_par_wr_rmw(adev, false);
-		} else
-			DRM_INFO("ECC is active.\n");
-
-		r = amdgpu_atomfirmware_sram_ecc_supported(adev);
-		if (!r)
-			DRM_INFO("SRAM ECC is not present.\n");
-		else
-			DRM_INFO("SRAM ECC is active.\n");
+		}
 	}
 
 	if (adev->mmhub.funcs && adev->mmhub.funcs->reset_ras_error_count)
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: drop duplicated ecc check for vega10
  2020-09-29  6:05 ` Zhang, Hawking
@ 2020-09-29  6:09   ` Chen, Guchun
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chen, Guchun @ 2020-09-29  6:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhang, Hawking, amd-gfx, Deucher, Alexander, Li, Dennis, Zhou1,
	Tao, Clements, John

[AMD Public Use]

Let me send v2 later to correct it.

Regards,
Guchun

-----Original Message-----
From: Zhang, Hawking <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 2:05 PM
To: Chen, Guchun <Guchun.Chen@amd.com>; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; Li, Dennis <Dennis.Li@amd.com>; Zhou1, Tao <Tao.Zhou1@amd.com>; Clements, John <John.Clements@amd.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: drop duplicated ecc check for vega10

[AMD Public Use]

Although we unified check ecc capability to ras_init, we still need to query the ecc capability here to apply the vega10 specific workaround. So we don't need to call the atomfirmware helper again, but leverage adev->ras_features to decide apply the workaround or not.

Regards,
Hawking

-----Original Message-----
From: Chen, Guchun <Guchun.Chen@amd.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 12:56
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; Zhang, Hawking <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>; Li, Dennis <Dennis.Li@amd.com>; Zhou1, Tao <Tao.Zhou1@amd.com>; Clements, John <John.Clements@amd.com>
Cc: Chen, Guchun <Guchun.Chen@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: drop duplicated ecc check for vega10

The same ECC check has been executed in amdgpu_ras_init for vega10, prior to gmc_v9_0_late_init.

Signed-off-by: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c | 13 +++----------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
index 3dddbc60fe3d..f72acb7cfea3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
@@ -1193,21 +1193,14 @@ static int gmc_v9_0_late_init(void *handle)
 	r = amdgpu_gmc_allocate_vm_inv_eng(adev);
 	if (r)
 		return r;
-	/* Check if ecc is available */
+
+	/* apply DF parity workaround */
 	if (!amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev) && (adev->asic_type == CHIP_VEGA10)) {
 		r = amdgpu_atomfirmware_mem_ecc_supported(adev);
 		if (!r) {
-			DRM_INFO("ECC is not present.\n");
 			if (adev->df.funcs->enable_ecc_force_par_wr_rmw)
 				adev->df.funcs->enable_ecc_force_par_wr_rmw(adev, false);
-		} else
-			DRM_INFO("ECC is active.\n");
-
-		r = amdgpu_atomfirmware_sram_ecc_supported(adev);
-		if (!r)
-			DRM_INFO("SRAM ECC is not present.\n");
-		else
-			DRM_INFO("SRAM ECC is active.\n");
+		}
 	}
 
 	if (adev->mmhub.funcs && adev->mmhub.funcs->reset_ras_error_count)
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-09-29  6:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-09-29  4:55 [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: drop duplicated ecc check for vega10 Guchun Chen
2020-09-29  6:05 ` Zhang, Hawking
2020-09-29  6:09   ` Chen, Guchun

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.