All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Evanson <Jeff.Evanson@qsc.com>
To: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>,
	Jeff Evanson <jeff.evanson@gmail.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
	<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "jeff.evanson@gmail.com" <jeff.evanson@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] Trigger proper interrupts in igc_xsk_wakeup
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 23:03:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CY4PR16MB002318405355FB6AC87CA0919BF39@CY4PR16MB0023.namprd16.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v8v6477g.fsf@intel.com>

Hi Vinicius. Thank you for the reply.

The scenario only happens when the transmit queue interrupt is mapped to a different interrupt from the receive queue. In the case where XDP_WAKEUP_TX is set in the flags argument, the previous code would only trigger the interrupt for the receive queue, causing the transmit queue's napi_struct to never be scheduled.

In the scenario where XDP_WAKEUP_TX and XDP_WAKEUP_RX are both set in flags, the receive interrupt is always triggered and the transmit interrupt is only triggered when the transmit q_vector differs from the receive q_vector.

Regards,
Jeff Evanson

-----Original Message-----
From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com> 
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 11:45 AM
To: Jeff Evanson <jeff.evanson@gmail.com>; Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>; Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>; intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jeff Evanson <Jeff.Evanson@qsc.com>; jeff.evanson@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Trigger proper interrupts in igc_xsk_wakeup

-External-

Jeff Evanson <jeff.evanson@gmail.com> writes:

> in igc_xsk_wakeup, trigger the proper interrupt based on whether flags 
> contains XDP_WAKEUP_RX and/or XDP_WAKEUP_TX
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Evanson <jeff.evanson@qsc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c | 36 
> +++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c 
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> index a36a18c84aeb..d706de95dc06 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> @@ -6073,7 +6073,7 @@ static void igc_trigger_rxtxq_interrupt(struct 
> igc_adapter *adapter,  int igc_xsk_wakeup(struct net_device *dev, u32 
> queue_id, u32 flags)  {
>  	struct igc_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(dev);
> -	struct igc_q_vector *q_vector;
> +	struct igc_q_vector *txq_vector = 0, *rxq_vector = 0;
>  	struct igc_ring *ring;
>  
>  	if (test_bit(__IGC_DOWN, &adapter->state)) @@ -6082,17 +6082,35 @@ 
> int igc_xsk_wakeup(struct net_device *dev, u32 queue_id, u32 flags)
>  	if (!igc_xdp_is_enabled(adapter))
>  		return -ENXIO;
>  
> -	if (queue_id >= adapter->num_rx_queues)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (flags & XDP_WAKEUP_RX) {
> +		if (queue_id >= adapter->num_rx_queues)
> +			return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	ring = adapter->rx_ring[queue_id];
> +		ring = adapter->rx_ring[queue_id];
> +		if (!ring->xsk_pool)
> +			return -ENXIO;
>  
> -	if (!ring->xsk_pool)
> -		return -ENXIO;
> +		rxq_vector = ring->q_vector;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (flags & XDP_WAKEUP_TX) {
> +		if (queue_id >= adapter->num_tx_queues)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
> +		ring = adapter->tx_ring[queue_id];
> +		if (!ring->xsk_pool)
> +			return -ENXIO;
> +
> +		txq_vector = ring->q_vector;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (rxq_vector &&
> +	    !napi_if_scheduled_mark_missed(&rxq_vector->napi))
> +		igc_trigger_rxtxq_interrupt(adapter, rxq_vector);
>  
> -	q_vector = adapter->q_vector[queue_id];
> -	if (!napi_if_scheduled_mark_missed(&q_vector->napi))
> -		igc_trigger_rxtxq_interrupt(adapter, q_vector);
> +	if (txq_vector && txq_vector != rxq_vector &&
> +	    !napi_if_scheduled_mark_missed(&txq_vector->napi))
> +		igc_trigger_rxtxq_interrupt(adapter, txq_vector);

Two things:
 - My imagination was not able to produce a scenario where this commit  would solve any problems. Can you explain better the case where the  current code would cause the wrong interrupt to be generated (or miss  generating an interrupt)? (this should be in the commit message)
 - I think that with this patch applied, there would cases (both TX and  RX flags set) that we cause two writes into the EICS register. That  could cause unnecessary wakeups.

>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> --
> 2.17.1
>

Cheers,
-- 
Vinicius


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Jeff Evanson <Jeff.Evanson@qsc.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/2] Trigger proper interrupts in igc_xsk_wakeup
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 23:03:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CY4PR16MB002318405355FB6AC87CA0919BF39@CY4PR16MB0023.namprd16.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v8v6477g.fsf@intel.com>

Hi Vinicius. Thank you for the reply.

The scenario only happens when the transmit queue interrupt is mapped to a different interrupt from the receive queue. In the case where XDP_WAKEUP_TX is set in the flags argument, the previous code would only trigger the interrupt for the receive queue, causing the transmit queue's napi_struct to never be scheduled.

In the scenario where XDP_WAKEUP_TX and XDP_WAKEUP_RX are both set in flags, the receive interrupt is always triggered and the transmit interrupt is only triggered when the transmit q_vector differs from the receive q_vector.

Regards,
Jeff Evanson

-----Original Message-----
From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com> 
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2022 11:45 AM
To: Jeff Evanson <jeff.evanson@gmail.com>; Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>; Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>; intel-wired-lan at lists.osuosl.org; netdev at vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jeff Evanson <Jeff.Evanson@qsc.com>; jeff.evanson at gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Trigger proper interrupts in igc_xsk_wakeup

-External-

Jeff Evanson <jeff.evanson@gmail.com> writes:

> in igc_xsk_wakeup, trigger the proper interrupt based on whether flags 
> contains XDP_WAKEUP_RX and/or XDP_WAKEUP_TX
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Evanson <jeff.evanson@qsc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c | 36 
> +++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c 
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> index a36a18c84aeb..d706de95dc06 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> @@ -6073,7 +6073,7 @@ static void igc_trigger_rxtxq_interrupt(struct 
> igc_adapter *adapter,  int igc_xsk_wakeup(struct net_device *dev, u32 
> queue_id, u32 flags)  {
>  	struct igc_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(dev);
> -	struct igc_q_vector *q_vector;
> +	struct igc_q_vector *txq_vector = 0, *rxq_vector = 0;
>  	struct igc_ring *ring;
>  
>  	if (test_bit(__IGC_DOWN, &adapter->state)) @@ -6082,17 +6082,35 @@ 
> int igc_xsk_wakeup(struct net_device *dev, u32 queue_id, u32 flags)
>  	if (!igc_xdp_is_enabled(adapter))
>  		return -ENXIO;
>  
> -	if (queue_id >= adapter->num_rx_queues)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (flags & XDP_WAKEUP_RX) {
> +		if (queue_id >= adapter->num_rx_queues)
> +			return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	ring = adapter->rx_ring[queue_id];
> +		ring = adapter->rx_ring[queue_id];
> +		if (!ring->xsk_pool)
> +			return -ENXIO;
>  
> -	if (!ring->xsk_pool)
> -		return -ENXIO;
> +		rxq_vector = ring->q_vector;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (flags & XDP_WAKEUP_TX) {
> +		if (queue_id >= adapter->num_tx_queues)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
> +		ring = adapter->tx_ring[queue_id];
> +		if (!ring->xsk_pool)
> +			return -ENXIO;
> +
> +		txq_vector = ring->q_vector;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (rxq_vector &&
> +	    !napi_if_scheduled_mark_missed(&rxq_vector->napi))
> +		igc_trigger_rxtxq_interrupt(adapter, rxq_vector);
>  
> -	q_vector = adapter->q_vector[queue_id];
> -	if (!napi_if_scheduled_mark_missed(&q_vector->napi))
> -		igc_trigger_rxtxq_interrupt(adapter, q_vector);
> +	if (txq_vector && txq_vector != rxq_vector &&
> +	    !napi_if_scheduled_mark_missed(&txq_vector->napi))
> +		igc_trigger_rxtxq_interrupt(adapter, txq_vector);

Two things:
 - My imagination was not able to produce a scenario where this commit  would solve any problems. Can you explain better the case where the  current code would cause the wrong interrupt to be generated (or miss  generating an interrupt)? (this should be in the commit message)
 - I think that with this patch applied, there would cases (both TX and  RX flags set) that we cause two writes into the EICS register. That  could cause unnecessary wakeups.

>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> --
> 2.17.1
>

Cheers,
-- 
Vinicius


  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-18 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-15 21:05 [PATCH 2/2] Trigger proper interrupts in igc_xsk_wakeup Jeff Evanson
2022-04-15 21:05 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jeff Evanson
2022-04-18 17:44 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2022-04-18 17:44   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vinicius Costa Gomes
2022-04-18 23:03   ` Jeff Evanson [this message]
2022-04-18 23:03     ` Jeff Evanson
2022-04-19 17:03     ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2022-04-19 17:03       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Vinicius Costa Gomes
2022-04-19 13:33 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-04-19 13:33   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Paolo Abeni
2022-04-19 14:19 ` Paul Menzel
2022-04-19 14:19   ` Paul Menzel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CY4PR16MB002318405355FB6AC87CA0919BF39@CY4PR16MB0023.namprd16.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=jeff.evanson@qsc.com \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jeff.evanson@gmail.com \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.