From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965310AbXCAQGO (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:06:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965304AbXCAQGO (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:06:14 -0500 Received: from smtp103.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([68.142.229.217]:34500 "HELO smtp103.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S965310AbXCAQGN (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:06:13 -0500 X-YMail-OSG: K7ZycjQVM1mTOar2ZDJmc3GMrccYpksyyTZNrb1JjR7Q.JJFY3EXREp3nVtSjO4VOCnCst8tRcBQBDPcxHKrhABzaah_HQqKyOvc.EIGXc6zMptJgzhB0TCZUbNgdGWFwKfcYqzlsCiyiiw- In-Reply-To: <45E6F78A.7070603@freescale.com> References: <45E46976.6060600@freescale.com> <29c13109971547687159078eacdea008@kernel.crashing.org> <45E592DC.9060700@freescale.com> <511cacb7bbe8a65ff72738c84ec9ece4@kernel.crashing.org> <45E5B604.904@freescale.com> <46F6BF70-2922-4E05-8DAB-6B0830B0AB47@embeddedalley.com> <45E5BD6B.1010509@freescale.com> <45E5C128.7020204@freescale.com> <45E5C333.2060100@zytor.com> <45E5D627.6030707@zytor.com> <45E5D84A.5000502@freescale.com> <278AADB6-E175-4177-A728-5357E21697B7@kernel.crashing.org> <45E5DB49.8010205@freescale.com> <45E6F78A.7070603@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Cc: Torben.Mathiasen@hp.com, Segher Boessenkool , Kumar Gala , linux-ppc-embedded , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "H. Peter Anvin" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dan Malek Subject: Re: lanana: Add major/minor entries for PPC QE UART devices Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:06:12 -0500 To: Timur Tabi X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Since I'm probably the only one that really uses the driver for custom uses and cares...... On Mar 1, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Timur Tabi wrote: > Ok guys, I need a consensus here. Are we going to allocate a > second block of 4 minor numbers for the QE/CPM UART or not? not. > My driver already has a macro that limits the number of UARTS to 4, perfect. > I'll add a second TTY struct... Don't worry about it for now. We'll just keep this in mind when we make a major change someday in the future. We may have a better solution then. Thanks. -- Dan From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp103.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp103.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.217]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 800CADDF38 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 03:06:13 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <45E6F78A.7070603@freescale.com> References: <45E46976.6060600@freescale.com> <29c13109971547687159078eacdea008@kernel.crashing.org> <45E592DC.9060700@freescale.com> <511cacb7bbe8a65ff72738c84ec9ece4@kernel.crashing.org> <45E5B604.904@freescale.com> <46F6BF70-2922-4E05-8DAB-6B0830B0AB47@embeddedalley.com> <45E5BD6B.1010509@freescale.com> <45E5C128.7020204@freescale.com> <45E5C333.2060100@zytor.com> <45E5D627.6030707@zytor.com> <45E5D84A.5000502@freescale.com> <278AADB6-E175-4177-A728-5357E21697B7@kernel.crashing.org> <45E5DB49.8010205@freescale.com> <45E6F78A.7070603@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: From: Dan Malek Subject: Re: lanana: Add major/minor entries for PPC QE UART devices Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:06:12 -0500 To: Timur Tabi Cc: Segher Boessenkool , linux-ppc-embedded , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "H. Peter Anvin" , Torben.Mathiasen@hp.com List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Since I'm probably the only one that really uses the driver for custom uses and cares...... On Mar 1, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Timur Tabi wrote: > Ok guys, I need a consensus here. Are we going to allocate a > second block of 4 minor numbers for the QE/CPM UART or not? not. > My driver already has a macro that limits the number of UARTS to 4, perfect. > I'll add a second TTY struct... Don't worry about it for now. We'll just keep this in mind when we make a major change someday in the future. We may have a better solution then. Thanks. -- Dan