From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sun, Yi" Subject: Re: Updated -next Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 04:15:40 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20120120101052.GC4151@phenom.ffwll.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [143.182.124.21]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2449E8D2 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:15:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120120101052.GC4151@phenom.ffwll.local> Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Daniel Vetter , Intel Graphics Development List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Hi all, > > Not much in the first -next update under the new process, I'd like to > tests the qa process first. Highligths: > - first part of i9xx_crtc_mode_set refactor from Jesse > - quite a few ajax-is-paranoid patches > - HAS_LLC param from Eugeni > - kill i915_mem.c > > For easier testing there's also an updated drm-intel-testing branch with > the latest -fixes merged in (i.e. the missed irq patches). Testing > feedback highly welcome. > > Hi Yi, > > Please put the -testing branch through the kernel qa process. Btw I've > noticed that the nightly tests are missing a few recent i-g-t tests, > please upgrade that. > Hi Daniel, I'm confused about branch drm-intel-testing. Does it mean drm-intel-next branch when you said branch drm-intel-testing? Thank you for finding the issue in nightly tests, I'll work it out soon. By the way, we will be in vacation till Jan 30th. Thanks --Sun Yi > Cheers, Daniel > -- > Daniel Vetter > Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch > Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48