The fsl-image-minimal rootfs doesn’t include those graphic packages by default, I think those packages are included by the dependency of new added packages.
You can run “bitbake -g fsl-image-minimal” to generate the dependence file and analysis how the unneeded packages are brought in.
Best Regards,
Zhenhua
From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org]
On Behalf Of Leonardo Sandoval
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 10:19 PM
To: Tanasa Bogdan <bogdan.tanasa@saabgroup.com>; 'yocto@yoctoproject.org' <yocto@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: Re: [yocto] profiling tools on a T4240RDB board
El 08/24/2016 a las 04:01 AM, Tanasa Bogdan escribió:
Hi,
We are using the (freescale) linux yocto 1.6 on a T4240RDB board where we want to have "tools-profile" set in our local.conf file. When building the fsl-image-minimal we see that there are some packages that are graphics-related (like gtk+, pixbuf, etc..). The card does not have any graphics capabilities. Why does these packets install at all? Is it possible to have the profiling tools without any gtk dependencies? How the local.conf should look like?
I believe the image you are using include those graphic-related pkgs so that is why you are seeing them. You may redefine your image, at the end
fsl-image-minimal is just an example that you can modify. Also you may have more answers on a FSL (NXP?) channel/mailing-list
PS: These dependencies are there even when we choose tools-sdk in order to have gcc in the final image.
Thanks,
Bogdan.