From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Phil Yang (Arm Technology China)" Subject: Re: [PATCH] packet_ordering: replace sync builtins with atomic builtins Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 01:34:11 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1546508946-12552-1-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com> <4875658.9Ep99fAZRr@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , nd , Honnappa Nagarahalli , nd To: "thomas@monjalon.net" Return-path: Received: from EUR03-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr40063.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.4.63]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737312BFA for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 02:34:13 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <4875658.9Ep99fAZRr@xps> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2019 2:43 AM > To: Phil Yang (Arm Technology China) > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd ; Honnappa Nagarahalli > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] packet_ordering: replace sync builtins wi= th > atomic builtins >=20 > 03/01/2019 10:49, Phil Yang: > > '__sync' builtins are deprecated, use '__atomic' builtins instead for > > packet_ordering. > > > > Fixes: 850f373 ("examples/packet_ordering: new sample app") > > > > Signed-off-by: Phil Yang > > Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu > > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang >=20 > Am I right there will be a new version of this patch? Hi Thomas, Yes, there will be a new version of this patch. It is under our internal di= scussion. I will upstream it out ASAP. Thanks, Phil >=20 >=20