All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "Bough Chen" <haibo.chen@nxp.com>,
	"Angus Ainslie" <angus@akkea.ca>,
	"Leonard Crestez" <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>,
	"Peng Fan" <peng.fan@nxp.com>, "Abel Vesa" <abel.vesa@nxp.com>,
	"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	"Michael Turquette" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	"Ulf Hansson" <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	"Guido Günther" <agx@sigxcpu.org>,
	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	"Sascha Hauer" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: sdhci timeout on imx8mq
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 01:30:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DBBPR04MB79308EBA24C4FD6B1053C57E87AF0@DBBPR04MB7930.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5BzAw8CjvaOzH_Ynr2eapO1MViTOWN5yZ5i_BcAhv3tWA@mail.gmail.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:festevam@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 2:57 AM
> To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Bough Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>; Angus Ainslie <angus@akkea.ca>;
> Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>; Peng Fan
> <peng.fan@nxp.com>; Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com>; Stephen Boyd
> <sboyd@kernel.org>; Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>; Ulf
> Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>; Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org>;
> linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>; Adrian Hunter
> <adrian.hunter@intel.com>; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>; Sascha
> Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>; moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC
> ARM ARCHITECTURE <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
> Subject: Re: sdhci timeout on imx8mq
> 
> Hi Lucas,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 12:06 PM Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> wrote:
> 
> > The reference manual states about this situation: "For any clock, its
> > source must be left on when it is kept on. Behavior is undefined if
> > this rule is violated."
> > And it seems this is exactly what's happening here: some kind of
> > glitch is introduced in the nand_usdhc_bus clock, which prevents the
> > SDHCI controller from working, even though the clock branch is
> > properly enabled later on. On my system the SDHCI timeout and
> > following runtime suspend/resume cycle on the nand_usdhc_bus clock
> > seem to get it back into a working state.
> 
> I think your analysis is correct and I recall helping a customer with a similar
> issue:
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcomm
> unity.nxp.com%2Ft5%2Fi-MX-Processors%2FExternal-clock-that-provide-root
> -clock-for-SAI3-and-SPDIF%2Fm-p%2F1019834&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cping
> .bai%40nxp.com%7C8d250a158cce469c378308d8b274d6d1%7C686ea1d3bc
> 2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637455562183497049%7CUnknow
> n%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1ha
> WwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=VkxuhmhDifzOxxfIgFz9PR5gKC1
> SyQhGeSHYysX1Co4%3D&amp;reserved=0
> 

For the customer case, it seem not the same issue. the customer issue is caused by clock source change while parent has no clock output.
This is inherit limitation for the CCM clock slice when using the smart interface to change the clock parent.

For current mmc timeout issue, I think we can have a try with nand_usdhc_bus clock gated at the beginning of kernel boot, directly modify the nand_usdhc_bus
Clock's HW register gate bit in clock-imx8mq.c.

BR
Jacky Bai
> Regards,
> 
> Fabio Estevam

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "Peng Fan" <peng.fan@nxp.com>, "Abel Vesa" <abel.vesa@nxp.com>,
	"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	"Michael Turquette" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	"Angus Ainslie" <angus@akkea.ca>,
	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Ulf Hansson" <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	"Bough Chen" <haibo.chen@nxp.com>,
	"Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	"Sascha Hauer" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Leonard Crestez" <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>,
	"Guido Günther" <agx@sigxcpu.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: sdhci timeout on imx8mq
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 01:30:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DBBPR04MB79308EBA24C4FD6B1053C57E87AF0@DBBPR04MB7930.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5BzAw8CjvaOzH_Ynr2eapO1MViTOWN5yZ5i_BcAhv3tWA@mail.gmail.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fabio Estevam [mailto:festevam@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 2:57 AM
> To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Bough Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>; Angus Ainslie <angus@akkea.ca>;
> Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>; Peng Fan
> <peng.fan@nxp.com>; Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com>; Stephen Boyd
> <sboyd@kernel.org>; Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>; Ulf
> Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>; Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org>;
> linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>; Adrian Hunter
> <adrian.hunter@intel.com>; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>; Sascha
> Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>; moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC
> ARM ARCHITECTURE <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
> Subject: Re: sdhci timeout on imx8mq
> 
> Hi Lucas,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 12:06 PM Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> wrote:
> 
> > The reference manual states about this situation: "For any clock, its
> > source must be left on when it is kept on. Behavior is undefined if
> > this rule is violated."
> > And it seems this is exactly what's happening here: some kind of
> > glitch is introduced in the nand_usdhc_bus clock, which prevents the
> > SDHCI controller from working, even though the clock branch is
> > properly enabled later on. On my system the SDHCI timeout and
> > following runtime suspend/resume cycle on the nand_usdhc_bus clock
> > seem to get it back into a working state.
> 
> I think your analysis is correct and I recall helping a customer with a similar
> issue:
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcomm
> unity.nxp.com%2Ft5%2Fi-MX-Processors%2FExternal-clock-that-provide-root
> -clock-for-SAI3-and-SPDIF%2Fm-p%2F1019834&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cping
> .bai%40nxp.com%7C8d250a158cce469c378308d8b274d6d1%7C686ea1d3bc
> 2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637455562183497049%7CUnknow
> n%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1ha
> WwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=VkxuhmhDifzOxxfIgFz9PR5gKC1
> SyQhGeSHYysX1Co4%3D&amp;reserved=0
> 

For the customer case, it seem not the same issue. the customer issue is caused by clock source change while parent has no clock output.
This is inherit limitation for the CCM clock slice when using the smart interface to change the clock parent.

For current mmc timeout issue, I think we can have a try with nand_usdhc_bus clock gated at the beginning of kernel boot, directly modify the nand_usdhc_bus
Clock's HW register gate bit in clock-imx8mq.c.

BR
Jacky Bai
> Regards,
> 
> Fabio Estevam
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-07  1:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-03 19:19 Fabio Estevam
2020-02-03 19:19 ` Fabio Estevam
2020-02-05  9:26 ` Guido Günther
2020-02-05  9:26   ` Guido Günther
2020-02-05 13:18   ` Fabio Estevam
2020-02-05 13:18     ` Fabio Estevam
2020-02-07  2:11     ` BOUGH CHEN
2020-02-07  2:11       ` BOUGH CHEN
     [not found]       ` <VI1PR04MB504091C7991353F6092A8D91901A0@VI1PR04MB5040.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
2020-02-13 10:53         ` Fabio Estevam
2020-02-13 10:53           ` Fabio Estevam
2020-06-30 19:39           ` Angus Ainslie
2020-06-30 19:39             ` Angus Ainslie
2020-07-07 12:44             ` Fabio Estevam
2020-07-07 12:44               ` Fabio Estevam
2020-07-08  1:32               ` BOUGH CHEN
2020-07-08  1:32                 ` BOUGH CHEN
2020-12-18 20:07                 ` Lucas Stach
2020-12-18 20:07                   ` Lucas Stach
2020-12-18 20:45                   ` Angus Ainslie
2020-12-18 20:45                     ` Angus Ainslie
2020-12-23 21:06                   ` Angus Ainslie
2020-12-23 21:06                     ` Angus Ainslie
2021-01-05 15:06                 ` Lucas Stach
2021-01-05 15:06                   ` Lucas Stach
2021-01-06  9:29                   ` Bough Chen
2021-01-06  9:29                     ` Bough Chen
2021-01-06 15:09                     ` Lucas Stach
2021-01-06 15:09                       ` Lucas Stach
2021-01-07  1:47                       ` Bough Chen
2021-01-07  1:47                         ` Bough Chen
2021-01-06 18:56                   ` Fabio Estevam
2021-01-06 18:56                     ` Fabio Estevam
2021-01-07  1:30                     ` Jacky Bai [this message]
2021-01-07  1:30                       ` Jacky Bai
2021-01-07 11:26                       ` Lucas Stach
2021-01-07 11:26                         ` Lucas Stach
2021-01-08  1:27                         ` Jacky Bai
2021-01-08  1:27                           ` Jacky Bai
2021-03-09  7:35                         ` Heiko Thiery
2021-03-09  7:35                           ` Heiko Thiery
2021-01-19  2:35                   ` Peng Fan
2021-01-19  2:35                     ` Peng Fan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DBBPR04MB79308EBA24C4FD6B1053C57E87AF0@DBBPR04MB7930.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=ping.bai@nxp.com \
    --cc=abel.vesa@nxp.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=agx@sigxcpu.org \
    --cc=angus@akkea.ca \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=haibo.chen@nxp.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=leonard.crestez@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --subject='RE: sdhci timeout on imx8mq' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.