From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1755614AbZJAQzJ@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755614AbZJAQzJ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:55:09 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755554AbZJAQzJ
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:55:09 -0400
Received: from smtp.zeugmasystems.com ([70.79.96.174]:5510 "EHLO
	zeugmasystems.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755379AbZJAQzI convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 1 Oct 2009 12:55:08 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Subject: RE: futex question
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:54:36 -0700
Message-ID: <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C501FD8280@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local>
In-Reply-To: <20091001092218.GH15345@elte.hu>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: futex question
Thread-Index: AcpCeM5Y8udjwKupT8qLYDY1nIet2AAPubbw
References: <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C501FD7F97@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local> <20091001092218.GH15345@elte.hu>
From: "Anirban Sinha" <ASinha@zeugmasystems.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>, "Darren Hart" <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>,
       "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
       "Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

>
>(Cc:-ed more futex folks.)
>

That is great but I am wondering, what's your opinion on this Ingo?