From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com ([74.125.82.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SIQHi-0000xp-Ab for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:06:26 +0200 Received: by wera1 with SMTP id a1so1523651wer.6 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:57:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=cLVXfAGbeKCkZxUUQLkgt7iDnGkPMHhFn8VwRzg6D8A=; b=XILk9NsNEz7TdcopAA0T1A9cBBgX0eV6kf7C1kE084fRPtFBQUyFNU5ps7aFEO9NkB Pe+uG69JC5GEFEEWgpC2e5Mqio1lJVbnkXfGGq2s0PRpORDXr+9Gc/L5lhZgAAAFSd5D nKlhWqw4RA2ha9DPQ2xvtJt6q6rK9Z0KJf1pFgvhWLBGVnH5+ockyhkqVH3A40m+3pnv 0nFdk0LvmymLreFFSlgfS+YEp66II+bMMFOO8Ckh9jGS+dZgvGHezdxfYBdPshTqpe+g c+SzHTp9uYhHOj8I/kYKPW0VI4nc48FLRUQN+DsLWs1s7QfjO92qR/Gc/tHsYav1W9JU 4JaQ== Received: by 10.180.107.104 with SMTP id hb8mr8758051wib.8.1334260626027; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.1.36] (ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl. [84.80.112.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ff9sm54515372wib.2.2012.04.12.12.57.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) From: Koen Kooi In-Reply-To: <4F873102.6020603@balister.org> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:57:02 +0200 Message-Id: References: <7E680CB2A76BB8438D08CF13C09FC53A46B06325@FMSMSX151.amr.corp.intel.com> <4F84D58F.8020608@gmail.com> <1334221321.31685.24.camel@ted> <4543FDF1-0512-4B36-ABB3-DBB957B86E88@dominion.thruhere.net> <1334256020.7309.45.camel@ted> <4F873102.6020603@balister.org> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmxLuNryLB7uVLdI8Zgm2nO+9tIiPCs3BXyngUFT5ufCb5dopA2eMc99l0Opjl6Aep1bhWB Subject: Re: Yocto Project 1.2 M4 schedule X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:06:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Op 12 apr. 2012, om 21:46 heeft Philip Balister het volgende geschreven: > On 04/12/2012 11:40 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 14:32 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 14:22, Koen Kooi = wrote: >>>> You just volunteered to handle all the "Does it work with yocto = 1.2?" questions :) >>>>=20 >>>> Simply put: people are stupid, they need explicit PHB compliant = names in tags, even if it isn't 100% politically correct to say "yocto" = when we actually mean "oe-core". >>>>=20 >>>> Unless the yocto 1.2 release note state that it's based on oe-core = "foo" and all layers compatible with "foo" use "foo" in tags/branches. >>>=20 >>> I think layers ought to have tags for both ... >>>=20 >>> -oe-core- >>> -yocto- >>=20 >> This would be rather sad if it were necessary. The whole point is = we're >> trying to build things which are compatible with each other. If that >> turns out not to be the case I want to fix it, not encourage it. >=20 > We need a coherent tag name to use across layers. The Yocto Project is > the umbrella project, so using the yocto-project in the tag name is a > good way to show this coordination among projects to people not = familiar > with how things are working. (As Koen notes, this makes communication > with people whose primary exposure to the Yocto Project is watching > youtube videos) >=20 > I do not want to see table containing Yocto Project release = information > and they relate to a set of seemingly random tags in other layers. >=20 > Philip >=20 > PS: For various reasons, the tag needs to be yocto-project.... not = yocto.... "yoctoproject", without the hyphen to be consistent with the domainname = :)=