From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Liu, Jinsong" Subject: Re: Xen 4.2 TODO / Release Plan Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:13:13 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5020D418020000780009318C@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <5020E85202000078000931F6@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5020E85202000078000931F6@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich , Ian Campbell , Keir Fraser Cc: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 07.08.12 at 09:50, Keir Fraser wrote: >> On 07/08/2012 07:38, "Jan Beulich" wrote: >> >>> Otoh, restoring from saved state that only includes MCG_CAP (but >>> no MCi_CTL2-s) needs to be handled anyway (forcing MCi_CTL2 >>> to be zero, which would be trivial as that's the startup state, i.e. >>> the only complication here is the variable size save record), so >>> pushing this to post-4.2 as well is a reasonable alternative. >>> >>> Keir, Ian? >> >> I think we should leave it and handle the variable-sized save record >> in 4.3. Using hvm_load_entry_zeroextend() to read in save records, >> with zero padding for older shorter records, should be >> straightforward enough. > > Okay. So Ian, you could then take the corresponding item > off the list. Or do you do that only once patches make it > through the regression tester? > So we will leave it and handle it after 4.2, right? I will take 1 week vacation start from tomorrow, so Jan, if anythting misunderstanding please let me know asap. Thanks, Jinsong