On Aug 20, 2014, at 12:01 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 02:11:07PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 09:33:05AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > >>> I thought UCM was targeted to this, but not widely used as expected? > >> Chrome uses t but not Android due to licensing issues. What happend to >> tinyucm? > > The latest Google reference designs use something which is essentially > tinyucm - the configuration is mostly stored in an XML configuration > file which is read at runtime. It's not consistent with what anyone > else uses. Those must be the qcom designs. They use a “tinyucm" that is xml based. I would like to see if we could get a consistent UCM for Android/Chrome/etc. Has this made it into the topics list?