All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manjukumar Harthikote Matha <MANJUKUM@xilinx.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] soc: zynqmp: Update required API version to 1.0
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 16:27:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM5PR02MB38630500EE3EB01E50D7B2C6B9950@DM5PR02MB3863.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e044b060-d208-4e6b-b9c2-39d6ea5d822d@denx.de>

Hi Marek,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marex at denx.de]
> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 2:45 AM
> To: Rajan Vaja <RAJANV@xilinx.com>
> Cc: monstr at monstr.eu; Albert Aribaud <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>;
> Manjukumar Harthikote Matha <MANJUKUM@xilinx.com>; Jolly Shah
> <JOLLYS@xilinx.com>; Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>; u-
> boot at lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: zynqmp: Update required API version to 1.0
> 
> On 05/21/2018 06:53 AM, Rajan Vaja wrote:
> > Hi Marek,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Marek Vasut [mailto:marex at denx.de]
> >> Sent: 15 May 2018 02:26 AM
> >> To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> >> Cc: Rajan Vaja <RAJANV@xilinx.com>; monstr at monstr.eu; Albert Aribaud
> >> <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: zynqmp: Update required API version to 1.0
> >>
> >> On 05/14/2018 03:39 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
> >>> From: Rajan Vaja <rajan.vaja@xilinx.com>
> >>>
> >>> Existing EEMI version is to as 1.0 (available from xilinx v2018.1
> >>> version). Update required API version to match with EEMI API version.
> >>
> >> Not sure I understand this sentence.
> >>
> >>> New PMUFW version is required for operations with programmable logic.
> >>
> >> Seems the meta-xilinx 2018.1 comes with PMUFW 2017.3
> >> https://github.com/Xilinx/meta-xilinx/tree/rel-v2018.1/meta-xilinx-
> >> bsp/recipes-bsp/pmu-firmware
> >>
> >> Is this out of date ?
> > [Rajan] PMU firmware is built using meta-xilinx-tools layer and not meta-xilinx-
> bsp.
> > The recipe in meta-xilinx-bsp is to build OSL flow (using multilib) this is not
> recommended nor supported from Xilinx.
> 
> Ah, I see, so there are three versions of pmu-firmware in a single
> release, but the one which is actually needed for the system to boot
> correctly is not in the meta-xilinx repo as one would expect, but in
> some other repo. That ... doesn't make any sense, but so be it.
> 

If you are planning to use rel-v2018.x Xilinx tools release branches, stick with all the layers provided by Xilinx. The same is documented in wiki as well

http://www.wiki.xilinx.com/How%20to%20build%20images%20through%20yocto

If you want to use Yocto open-source release stick with branches likes rocko, morty etc. These branches will not have dependencies on Xilinx tools.
 
> So it's this pmu-firmware_git recipe which provides different ABI in
> different versions of meta-xilinx-bsp, yet this is not in any way
> indicated by the package version, right ?

Didn’t get what you mean here? Package version is set according to the release under use
https://github.com/Xilinx/meta-xilinx-tools/blob/master/classes/xsctapp.bbclass#L9

This should indicate, release version with a part of commit id of git being used.

> 
> Also, do I understand it correctly that Xilinx doesn't support arm64
> with multilib?
> 

Yes Xilinx does not support multilib way of building PMUFW. The official support is in meta-xilinx-tools layer with a dependency on xsct tool

Thanks,
Manju

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-21 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-14 13:39 [U-Boot] [PATCH] soc: zynqmp: Update required API version to 1.0 Michal Simek
2018-05-14 20:55 ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-17 13:59   ` Michal Simek
2018-05-17 14:02     ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-21  4:53   ` Rajan Vaja
2018-05-21  9:45     ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-21 16:27       ` Manjukumar Harthikote Matha [this message]
2018-05-21 16:47         ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-21 21:26           ` Manjukumar Harthikote Matha
2018-05-22 11:27             ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-22 16:44               ` Manjukumar Harthikote Matha
2018-05-23  9:49                 ` Marek Vasut
2018-05-23 17:31                   ` Manjukumar Harthikote Matha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM5PR02MB38630500EE3EB01E50D7B2C6B9950@DM5PR02MB3863.namprd02.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=manjukum@xilinx.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.