From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tim Romanski Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 18:27:01 +0000 Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] test: dm: Add test for ECDSA UCLASS support In-Reply-To: <5a0ca21a-1a51-f47e-3159-8d4517f483c9@gmail.com> References: <20210316002432.2581891-1-mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> <20210316002432.2581891-7-mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> <5a0ca21a-1a51-f47e-3159-8d4517f483c9@gmail.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 3/30/21 2:17PM, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote: > I don't have any updates from Tim that you don't. I assume he's still silently hacking at it. Yep, I'm working on a software implementation of ECDSA. Currently have the OpenSSL implementation for the nistp256 curve isolated, debugging a test program that verifies a signature on data that was randomly generated, then will need to clean up unnecessary code and fit it into U-Boot. CC'd my @linux.microsoft.com email, I prefer to use that one from now on. All the best, Tim -----Original Message----- From: Alex G. Sent: March 29, 2021 2:43 PM To: Simon Glass Cc: U-Boot Mailing List ; Tom Rini ; Tim Romanski Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] test: dm: Add test for ECDSA UCLASS support + Tim On 3/29/21 2:43 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Alexandru, > > On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 at 13:24, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote: >> >> This test verifies that ECDSA_UCLASS is implemented, and that >> ecdsa_verify() works as expected. The definition of "expected" is >> "does not find a device, and returns -ENODEV". >> >> The lack of a hardware-independent ECDSA implementation prevents us >> from having one in the sandbox, for now. > > Yes we do need a software impl at some point. Any update on that? I don't have any updates from Tim that you don't. I assume he's still silently hacking at it. Alex