All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jayatheerthan, Jay" <jay.jayatheerthan@intel.com>
To: "Naga Harish K, S V" <s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com>,
	"ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com" <ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com>,
	"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] kni: optimize alloc queue release
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 15:20:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB43489D87DB2A8D016B98AB4AFDEF9@DM6PR11MB4348.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220413145717.3661947-1-s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Naga Harish K, S V <s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2022 8:27 PM
> To: ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Cc: Jayatheerthan, Jay <jay.jayatheerthan@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH v3] kni: optimize alloc queue release
> 
> the kni alloc queue is filled with physical addresses of mbufs

nitpick: "The" instead of "the".

> for kernel consumption. Any unused mbufs in the alloc queue are
> freed during shutdown sequence in rte_kni_release.
> 
> In the current existing implementation, for freeing one entry of

nitpick: current and existing are redundant. Can keep one.

> alloc queue all the objects of the mempool are traversed. This
> process is repeated for all the objects of the alloc queue which
> consumes lot of cpu cycles.
> 
> Instead of using mempool object iteration method,use
> ``rte_mem_iova2virt()`` api to get the virtual address
> for the physical addresses of alloc_q objects.
> This speeds up the freeing process.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naga Harish K S V <s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com>
> ---
> v2:
> * fix checkpatch errors
> 
> v3:
> * fix commit message as per review comments
> ---
>  lib/kni/rte_kni.c | 23 ++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/kni/rte_kni.c b/lib/kni/rte_kni.c
> index 7971c56bb4..f443e5b2fc 100644
> --- a/lib/kni/rte_kni.c
> +++ b/lib/kni/rte_kni.c
> @@ -375,26 +375,19 @@ va2pa_all(struct rte_mbuf *mbuf)
>  }
> 
>  static void
> -obj_free(struct rte_mempool *mp __rte_unused, void *opaque, void *obj,
> -		unsigned obj_idx __rte_unused)
> -{
> -	struct rte_mbuf *m = obj;
> -	void *mbuf_phys = opaque;
> -
> -	if (va2pa(m) == mbuf_phys)
> -		rte_pktmbuf_free(m);
> -}
> -
> -static void
> -kni_free_fifo_phy(struct rte_mempool *mp, struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo)
> +kni_free_fifo_phy(struct rte_kni_fifo *fifo)
>  {
>  	void *mbuf_phys;
>  	int ret;
> +	struct rte_mbuf *m;
> 
>  	do {
>  		ret = kni_fifo_get(fifo, &mbuf_phys, 1);
> -		if (ret)
> -			rte_mempool_obj_iter(mp, obj_free, mbuf_phys);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			m = (struct rte_mbuf *)
> +				rte_mem_iova2virt((rte_iova_t)mbuf_phys);
> +			rte_pktmbuf_free(m);
> +		}
>  	} while (ret);
>  }
> 
> @@ -440,7 +433,7 @@ rte_kni_release(struct rte_kni *kni)
>  	if (kni_fifo_count(kni->rx_q))
>  		RTE_LOG(ERR, KNI, "Fail to free all Rx-q items\n");
> 
> -	kni_free_fifo_phy(kni->pktmbuf_pool, kni->alloc_q);
> +	kni_free_fifo_phy(kni->alloc_q);
>  	kni_free_fifo(kni->tx_q);
>  	kni_free_fifo(kni->free_q);
> 
> --
> 2.23.0


  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-14 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-13  5:40 [PATCH] kni: optimize alloc queue release Naga Harish K S V
2022-04-13  5:48 ` [PATCH v2] " Naga Harish K S V
2022-04-13 10:23   ` Kundapura, Ganapati
2022-04-14 10:01     ` Naga Harish K, S V
2022-04-13 14:57   ` [PATCH v3] " Naga Harish K S V
2022-04-14 15:20     ` Jayatheerthan, Jay [this message]
2022-04-14 17:38       ` Naga Harish K, S V
2022-04-14 17:35   ` [PATCH v4] " Naga Harish K S V
2022-05-31  8:32     ` Naga Harish K, S V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM6PR11MB43489D87DB2A8D016B98AB4AFDEF9@DM6PR11MB4348.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=jay.jayatheerthan@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com \
    --cc=s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.