All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Han Xu <han.xu@nxp.com>
To: Michael Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>,
	U-Boot-Denx <u-boot@lists.denx.de>
Cc: Ye Li <ye.li@nxp.com>, Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>,
	Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>,
	Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>,
	"linux-kernel@amarulasolutions.com"
	<linux-kernel@amarulasolutions.com>,
	Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>,
	 Ariel D'Alessandro <ariel.dalessandro@collabora.com>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 2/4] mtd: nand: mxs_nand_spl: Fix bad block skipping
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:27:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DU2PR04MB8774A9236E2DBA00DBA1B07A97FD9@DU2PR04MB8774.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220427055025.231586-3-michael@amarulasolutions.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 12:50 AM
> To: Han Xu <han.xu@nxp.com>; U-Boot-Denx <u-boot@lists.denx.de>
> Cc: Ye Li <ye.li@nxp.com>; Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>; Miquel Raynal
> <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>; Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>; Dario
> Binacchi <dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com>; Sean Anderson
> <sean.anderson@seco.com>; linux-kernel@amarulasolutions.com; Jagan Teki
> <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>; Ariel D'Alessandro
> <ariel.dalessandro@collabora.com>; Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH V2 2/4] mtd: nand: mxs_nand_spl: Fix bad block skipping
> 
> The specific implementation was having bug. Those bugs are since the beginning
> of the implementation. Some manufactures can receive this bug in their SPL code.
> This bug start to be more visible on architecture that has complicated boot
> process like imx8mn. Older version of uboot has the same problem only if the
> bad block appear in correspoding of befine of u-boot image. In order to adjust
> the function we scan from the first block. The logic is not changed to have a
> simple way to fix without get regression.
> 
> The problematic part of old code was in this part:
> 
> while (is_badblock(mtd, offs, 1)) {
>            page = page + nand_page_per_block;
>           /* Check i we've reached the end of flash. */
>           if (page >= mtd->size >> chip->page_shift) {
>                       free(page_buf);
>                       return -ENOMEM;
>          }
> }
> 
> Even we fix it adding increment of the offset of one erase block size we don't fix
> the problem, because the first erase block where the image start is not checked.

Could you please describe more details about your test? Thanks.

> The code was tested on an imx8mn where the boot rom api was not able to skip
> it. Apart of that other architecure are using this code and all boards that has
> nand as boot device can be affected
> 
> Cc: Han Xu <han.xu@nxp.com>
> Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>
> ---
> V1->V2:
> 	- Adjust the commit message
> 	- Add Cc Han Xu and Fabio
> 	- fix size >= 0 to > 0
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mxs_nand_spl.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mxs_nand_spl.c
> b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mxs_nand_spl.c
> index 59a67ee414..2bfb181007 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mxs_nand_spl.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mxs_nand_spl.c
> @@ -218,14 +218,14 @@ void nand_init(void)
>  	mxs_nand_setup_ecc(mtd);
>  }
> 
> -int nand_spl_load_image(uint32_t offs, unsigned int size, void *buf)
> +int nand_spl_load_image(uint32_t offs, unsigned int size, void *dst)
>  {
> -	struct nand_chip *chip;
> -	unsigned int page;
> +	unsigned int sz;
> +	unsigned int block, lastblock;
> +	unsigned int page, page_offset;
>  	unsigned int nand_page_per_block;
> -	unsigned int sz = 0;
> +	struct nand_chip *chip;
>  	u8 *page_buf = NULL;
> -	u32 page_off;
> 
>  	chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
>  	if (!chip->numchips)
> @@ -235,47 +235,42 @@ int nand_spl_load_image(uint32_t offs, unsigned int
> size, void *buf)
>  	if (!page_buf)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> 
> -	page = offs >> chip->page_shift;
> -	page_off = offs & (mtd->writesize - 1);
> +	/* offs has to be aligned to a page address! */
> +	block = offs / mtd->erasesize;
> +	lastblock = (offs + size - 1) / mtd->erasesize;
> +	page = (offs % mtd->erasesize) / mtd->writesize;
> +	page_offset = offs % mtd->writesize;
>  	nand_page_per_block = mtd->erasesize / mtd->writesize;
> 
> -	debug("%s offset:0x%08x len:%d page:%x\n", __func__, offs, size, page);
> -
> -	while (size) {
> -		if (mxs_read_page_ecc(mtd, page_buf, page) < 0)
> -			return -1;
> -
> -		if (size > (mtd->writesize - page_off))
> -			sz = (mtd->writesize - page_off);
> -		else
> -			sz = size;
> -
> -		memcpy(buf, page_buf + page_off, sz);
> -
> -		offs += mtd->writesize;
> -		page++;
> -		buf += (mtd->writesize - page_off);
> -		page_off = 0;
> -		size -= sz;
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * Check if we have crossed a block boundary, and if so
> -		 * check for bad block.
> -		 */
> -		if (!(page % nand_page_per_block)) {
> -			/*
> -			 * Yes, new block. See if this block is good. If not,
> -			 * loop until we find a good block.
> -			 */
> -			while (is_badblock(mtd, offs, 1)) {
> -				page = page + nand_page_per_block;
> -				/* Check i we've reached the end of flash. */
> -				if (page >= mtd->size >> chip->page_shift) {
> +	while (block <= lastblock && size > 0) {
> +		if (!is_badblock(mtd, mtd->erasesize * block, 1)) {
> +			/* Skip bad blocks */
> +			while (page < nand_page_per_block) {
> +				int curr_page = nand_page_per_block * block +
> page;
> +
> +				if (mxs_read_page_ecc(mtd, page_buf, curr_page)
> < 0) {
>  					free(page_buf);
> -					return -ENOMEM;
> +					return -EIO;
>  				}
> +
> +				if (size > (mtd->writesize - page_offset))
> +					sz = (mtd->writesize - page_offset);
> +				else
> +					sz = size;
> +
> +				memcpy(dst, page_buf + page_offset, sz);
> +				dst += sz;
> +				size -= sz;
> +				page_offset = 0;
> +				page++;
>  			}
> +
> +			page = 0;
> +		} else {
> +			lastblock++;
>  		}
> +
> +		block++;
>  	}
> 
>  	free(page_buf);
> @@ -294,6 +289,19 @@ void nand_deselect(void)
> 
>  u32 nand_spl_adjust_offset(u32 sector, u32 offs)  {
> -	/* Handle the offset adjust in nand_spl_load_image,*/
> +	unsigned int block, lastblock;
> +
> +	block = sector / mtd->erasesize;
> +	lastblock = (sector + offs) / mtd->erasesize;
> +
> +	while (block <= lastblock) {
> +		if (is_badblock(mtd, block * mtd->erasesize, 1)) {
> +			offs += mtd->erasesize;
> +			lastblock++;
> +		}
> +
> +		block++;
> +	}
> +
>  	return offs;
>  }
> --
> 2.25.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-28  0:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-27  5:50 [PATCH V2 0/4] MXS nand fixes in SPL Michael Trimarchi
2022-04-27  5:50 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] nand: raw: mxs_nand: Fix specific hook registration Michael Trimarchi
2022-05-06 14:40   ` Han Xu
2022-04-27  5:50 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] mtd: nand: mxs_nand_spl: Fix bad block skipping Michael Trimarchi
2022-04-28  0:27   ` Han Xu [this message]
2022-04-28  5:01     ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2022-05-01  6:36       ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2022-05-02 21:32         ` Han Xu
2022-05-03  5:14           ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2022-05-06  8:21             ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2022-05-06 14:41   ` Han Xu
2022-05-06 14:44     ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2022-04-27  5:50 ` [PATCH V2 3/4] arm: mach-imx: cmd_nandbcb fix bad block handling Michael Trimarchi
2022-05-06 14:41   ` Han Xu
2022-05-11  6:49     ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2022-05-11 15:17       ` Tim Harvey
2022-04-27  5:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] spl: spl_nand: Fix bad block handling in fitImage Michael Trimarchi
2022-04-28 12:45   ` Tom Rini
2022-05-06 14:42   ` Han Xu
2022-05-11 15:16 ` [PATCH V2 0/4] MXS nand fixes in SPL Tim Harvey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DU2PR04MB8774A9236E2DBA00DBA1B07A97FD9@DU2PR04MB8774.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=han.xu@nxp.com \
    --cc=ariel.dalessandro@collabora.com \
    --cc=dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=festevam@denx.de \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=michael@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=sbabic@denx.de \
    --cc=sean.anderson@seco.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    --cc=ye.li@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.