Thank you for your feedback. I shall break it up and submit it in parts.
Checkpatch.pl gives me over 70 errors/warnings for dgnc_neo.c, would it be better if I broke that up into
multiple patches as well or?

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Staging: dgnc: fixed code style issues, mainly line width issues.
> From: joe@perches.com
> To: yorick-rommers@hotmail.com
> CC: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; markh@compro.net; lidza.louina@gmail.com; driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 18:28:20 -0700
>
> On Sun, 2015-04-19 at 02:04 +0200, Yorick Rommers wrote:
> > A patch for dgnc_mgmt.c and dgnc_neo.c to fix some code style issues.
>
> trivial notes:
>
> Try breaking up the patches you send into more discrete
> chucks that do just one thing, not mostly one thing
> and some other things.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_mgmt.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_mgmt.c
> []
> > @@ -148,7 +148,9 @@ long dgnc_mgmt_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > di.info_bdstate = dgnc_Board[brd]->dpastatus;
> > di.info_ioport = 0;
> > di.info_physaddr = (ulong) dgnc_Board[brd]->membase;
> > - di.info_physsize = (ulong) dgnc_Board[brd]->membase - dgnc_Board[brd]->membase_end;
>
> It may be better to use a temporary for brd like:
>
> struct dgnc_board *bd = dgnc_Board[brd];
>
> as is done a few other places.
>
> > + di.info_physsize =
> > + (ulong) dgnc_Board[brd]->membase - dgnc_Board[brd]->membase_end;
>
> so this becomes
> di.info->physsize = bd->membase - bd->membase_end;
>
> though I wonder if this is a defect and size
> should be bd->membase_end - bd->membase + 1
>
> It doesn't need a cast as membase and membase_end
> are ulong already.
>
> It also seems this physsize variable isn't used.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
> []
> > @@ -79,7 +79,8 @@ struct board_ops dgnc_neo_ops = {
> > .send_immediate_char = neo_send_immediate_char
> > };
> >
> > -static uint dgnc_offset_table[8] = { 0x01, 0x02, 0x04, 0x08, 0x10, 0x20, 0x40, 0x80 };
> > +static uint dgnc_offset_table[8] = { 0x01, 0x02, 0x04, 0x08,
> > +0x10, 0x20, 0x40, 0x80 };
>
> That's less attractive then what's already there.
> The generic kernel form for an array declaration would be:
>
> static uint dgnc_offset_table[8] = {
> 0x01, 0x02, 0x04, 0x08, 0x10, 0x20, 0x40, 0x80
> };
>
> This also would be better as static const.
>
> I stopped reading here.
>