From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] crypto/dpaa_sec: update maximum queue pairs to 2 Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 16:00:21 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1524156759-12931-1-git-send-email-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> <1524156759-12931-4-git-send-email-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Nipun Gupta To: Akhil Goyal , Hemant Agrawal , "dev@dpdk.org" Return-path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7663C7ECB for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2018 18:00:25 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > -----Original Message----- > From: Akhil Goyal [mailto:akhil.goyal@nxp.com] > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 11:40 AM > To: Hemant Agrawal ; dev@dpdk.org; De Lara > Guarch, Pablo > Cc: Nipun Gupta > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] crypto/dpaa_sec: update maximum queue pairs to 2 >=20 > Hi Hemant, > On 4/20/2018 3:53 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Hemant/Nipun > >> On 4/19/2018 10:22 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote: > >>> From: Nipun Gupta > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Nipun Gupta > >>> --- > >>> drivers/crypto/dpaa_sec/dpaa_sec.h | 2 +- > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/dpaa_sec/dpaa_sec.h > >>> b/drivers/crypto/dpaa_sec/dpaa_sec.h > >>> index 1433595..5b25aa1 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/crypto/dpaa_sec/dpaa_sec.h > >>> +++ b/drivers/crypto/dpaa_sec/dpaa_sec.h > >>> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ struct dpaa_sec_qp { > >>> int tx_errs; > >>> }; > >>> > >>> -#define RTE_DPAA_MAX_NB_SEC_QPS 1 > >>> +#define RTE_DPAA_MAX_NB_SEC_QPS 2 > >>> #define RTE_DPAA_MAX_RX_QUEUE > >> RTE_DPAA_SEC_PMD_MAX_NB_SESSIONS > >>> #define DPAA_MAX_DEQUEUE_NUM_FRAMES 63 > >>> > >>> > >> Why 2? I think it should be 8. > >> > > [Hemant] Ok. Sending v2 >=20 > I guess this need some testing whether it will break the existing use cas= es or not. >=20 > Pablo, >=20 > I recommend, it would be good if you can apply the other 3 patches in thi= s series > in RC1. This patch should be hold back for RC2. Good to me. Thanks, Pablo >=20 > Thanks, > Akhil