From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:54:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:53:59 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:60178 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:53:50 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch] zero-bounce highmem I/O To: davem@redhat.com (David S. Miller) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:56:21 +0100 (BST) Cc: kraxel@bytesex.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "David S. Miller" at Aug 16, 2001 07:15:19 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > It is video layer, and the video layer should be helping along with > these sorts of issues. Linus refused to let make make the vmalloc helpers generic code, thats why we have 8 or 9 different copies some containing old bugs > void video_pci_put_user_pages(struct pci_dev *pdev, > struct scatterlist *sg, > int npages); Why video_pci. WHy is this even video related. This is a generic issue > In fact, this isn't even a video layer issue, and the kernel > ought to provide my suggested interfaces in some generic > place. Then we agree on that