From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S268974AbRHPXLq>; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 19:11:46 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S268963AbRHPXLh>; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 19:11:37 -0400
Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:45321 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S268974AbRHPXLc>; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 19:11:32 -0400
Subject: Re: 2.4.9 does not compile [PATCH]
To: davem@redhat.com (David S. Miller)
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:08:55 +0100 (BST)
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, tpepper@vato.org, f5ibh@db0bm.ampr.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <no.id> from "David S. Miller" at Aug 16, 2001 04:02:08 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E15XWFz-0006IO-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> I don't recall you saying anything about "make sure to tell the
> maintainers" But, on the other hand, I can't prove that you didn't (I
> don't keep detailed mail logs anymore except for what I send out
> myself), so if you did I apologize.

I'm pretty sure I did (and I can prove it but whatever 8)). Whats done is done.
I think it was a bad idea for 2.4 (driver compat nightmare). 

Anyway arguing about it achieves nothing for anyone

Alan