From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 10:28:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 10:27:54 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:6670 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 10:27:44 -0400 Subject: Re: Promise Ultra100(20268) address conflict with ServerWorks IDE To: W.Koenig@gsi.de (Koenig Dr. Wolfgang) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 15:30:06 +0100 (BST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ('linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org') In-Reply-To: from "Koenig Dr. Wolfgang" at Aug 17, 2001 04:18:07 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I/O ports at 5440 [size=16] > > // notice the gap at 5450-545F. > // It will be allocated for the Serverworks IDE controller later. > // This gap is only real, if size=16 is a true statement The size data is read from the PCI card itself, which would lead me to suspect we reserve to much maybe ?