From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 11:20:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 11:20:37 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:50190 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 11:20:30 -0400 Subject: Re: Kernel panic problem in 2.4.7 To: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 16:23:16 +0100 (BST) Cc: antihong@tt.co.kr (=?ks_c_5601-1987?B?v8C0w7D6s7vAzyDIq7yuufw=?=), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Alan Cox" at Aug 17, 2001 04:11:44 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > If your cpu context corrupt is with a machine check exception report then > your processor took an internal fault reporting trap. So its not a happy > bit of silicon I suspect - be it overclocked, overheated, or even faulty. Beware beta versions of editors 8) If your CPU context corrupt message is appearing with a machine check exception report, then you processor took an internal fault reporting trap. So it's not a happy piece of silicon I suspect - be it overclocked, overheated or even faulty. The machine check numbers it prints can be looked up in the processor manuals to decode the type of fault.