From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:20:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:20:40 -0400 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.101]:46758 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:20:39 -0400 To: Robert Love cc: Rick Bressler , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: Gerrit Huizenga From: Gerrit Huizenga Subject: Re: [PATCH] scheduler hints In-Reply-To: Your message of 05 Jun 2002 18:11:38 PDT. <1023325903.912.390.camel@sinai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <24407.1023326371.1@us.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 18:19:31 -0700 Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In message <1023325903.912.390.camel@sinai>, > : Robert Love writes: > On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 18:05, Gerrit Huizenga wrote: > > > Actually, process-to-process affinity, which was later generalized > > as a process gang affinity. > > Oh OK, gang affinity - a bit different and not what we do now :) > > Interesting to look into, although not terribly useful I suspect weighed > against its implementation... > > Robert Love Our scheduler *was* a long set of conditionals. However, from the stock BSD scheduler through the contorted thing that it became, we saw something like 30-50% increases in some workloads. I think the motivator was actually not Oracle originally but something like SAP. Specific numbers are hard to extract now since we did so many SMP & NUMA changes over the years, but I think I remember a slide showing over 30% increase in SAP for this one additional feature. I don't know that I ever saw specific Oracle or Oracle Apps numbers for this although it was viewed as a "large" benefit, especially in NUMA machines, but even on SMP machines. gerrit