From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Daniel Phillips Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimize out pte_chain take three Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 16:08:09 +0200 References: <20810000.1026311617@baldur.austin.ibm.com> <20020710222210.GU25360@holomorphy.com> <3D2CD3D3.B43E0E1F@zip.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3D2CD3D3.B43E0E1F@zip.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton , William Lee Irwin III Cc: Rik van Riel , Dave McCracken , Linux Memory Management List-ID: On Thursday 11 July 2002 02:39, Andrew Morton wrote: > example 1: "run thirty processes which mmap a common 50000 page file and > touch its pages in a random-but-always-the-same pattern at fifty pages > per second. Then run (dbench|tiobench|kernel build|slocate|foo). Postmark looks like an excellend benchmark to add to the list, in fact from the description, I'd put it at the front of the list. It's apparently much more stable than dbench, a property we desperately need just now. -- Daniel -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/