From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 04:50:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 04:50:30 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]:22715 "EHLO fencepost.gnu.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 04:50:30 -0500 From: Richard Stallman To: Horst von Brand CC: steve@tuxsoft.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, brand@eeyore.valparaiso.cl In-reply-to: <200301201338.h0KDcLjd001178@eeyore.valparaiso.cl> (message from Horst von Brand on Mon, 20 Jan 2003 14:38:21 +0100) Subject: Re: [OFFTOPIC] RMS and reactions to him Reply-to: rms@gnu.org References: <200301201338.h0KDcLjd001178@eeyore.valparaiso.cl> Message-Id: Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 04:59:37 -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The meaning attached to this symbol is one we disagree with (see > http://www.gnu.org/gnu/why-gnu-linux.html), so we will not accept > it as the symbol of our work. But you don't attach strings about naming in GPL, so you are SOL respect FSF owned software. Please see http://www.gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html#deserve. What is discussed here is the operating system (narrow sense, i.e., kernel only) called Linux, on which you have no claim whatsoever. We all agree that the proper name for the kernel is "Linux." The disagreement is about the name for the complete system that people use on desktops and servers.