From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Bronson Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 07:30:49 -0700 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Re: U-Boot for AT91RM9200DK In-Reply-To: <3F99349C.7040202@imc-berlin.de> (message from Steven Scholz on Fri, 24 Oct 2003 16:18:04 +0200) References: <3F913C5A.8070303@imc-berlin.de> <3F914731.1000207@imc-berlin.de> <3F914F82.3060502@imc-berlin.de> <3F98EA80.9040302@imc-berlin.de> <3F99349C.7040202@imc-berlin.de> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > > Hi Rick, > > >>Should we put all the init code into cpu/at91rm9200/{start.S} and use CONFIG_ > >>and CFG_? > > > > I'd put it all in start.S and not define any CONFIG for it. > Hmm. But my boards has a completly different clocking scheme! > For instance: I use an 16MHz external clock oszillator. The eval board has an > 18,xxx MHz crystal... > So we need at least some CFG_'s for clock configuration. > > Ok? No. I have completely different crystals than the AT91RM9200DK. Do you want me to put my clock settings in u-boot? How about the 500 different AT91RM9200 boards that get designed this year? Do you want their specific stuff in u-boot? By necessity u-boot is already nearing #ifdef hell because it supports so many devel boards (which is good). If we all threw our specific board design stuff in there, I don't think anyone in their right mind would use u-boot. Just my opinion ;-) Maybe Wolfgang disagrees. Rick > > -- > Steven Scholz > > imc Measurement & Control imc Me?systeme GmbH > Voltastr. 5 Voltastr. 5 > 13355 Berlin 13355 Berlin > Germany Deutschland > fon: +49 30 467090-0 Tel: 030 / 467090-0 > fax: +49 30 4631576 fax: 030 / 4631576 > >