From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Herbert Xu Subject: Re: 2.6.20 crash in tcp_tso_segment() Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 07:12:21 +1100 Message-ID: References: <7478.1171000672@mdt.dhcp.pit.laurelnetworks.com> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: maccetta@laurelnetworks.com (Mike Accetta) Return-path: Received: from rhun.apana.org.au ([64.62.148.172]:1250 "EHLO arnor.apana.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992800AbXBIUMe (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:12:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <7478.1171000672@mdt.dhcp.pit.laurelnetworks.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Mike Accetta wrote: > > Obviously the code believes it can assume that there are always multiple > sk_buff's in the chain. The stack trace seems to implicate iptables in > the scenario (twice) if that means anything. Any ideas about what may > be going wrong here? There is indeed a private module loaded at the time > but it does no networking and I doubt it is the culprit. Yeah we should never get here if we only have one segment. Could you get it to print out the value of skb->gso_*? Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt