From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965090AbcIPRlp (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:41:45 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:38308 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935315AbcIPRkP (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:40:15 -0400 From: Mark Brown To: Matthias Kaehlcke Cc: Mark Brown , Mark Brown , lgirdwood@gmail.com, Douglas Anderson , briannorris@chromium.org, javier@dowhile0.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1473871930-99603-3-git-send-email-mka@chromium.org> Message-Id: Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 18:40:03 +0100 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:348:6:8808:fab::3 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Applied "regulator: core: Don't skip set_voltage_time when ramp delay disabled" to the regulator tree X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk); Unknown failure Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The patch regulator: core: Don't skip set_voltage_time when ramp delay disabled has been applied to the regulator tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark >>From d89564efe79419a093e966a959bf5ba2c94e693f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthias Kaehlcke Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:52:07 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] regulator: core: Don't skip set_voltage_time when ramp delay disabled The current code assumes that only the ramp_delay is used to determine the time needed for the voltage to stabilize. This may be true for the calculation done by regulator_set_voltage_time_sel(), however regulators can implement their own set_voltage_time_sel() op which would be skipped if no ramp delay is specified. Remove the check in _regulator_do_set_voltage(), the functions calculating the ramp delay return 0 anyway when the ramp delay is not configured. Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/regulator/core.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c index b0076ccf896b..df3028b2a8e9 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c @@ -2804,9 +2804,7 @@ static int _regulator_do_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, goto out; /* Call set_voltage_time_sel if successfully obtained old_selector */ - if (!rdev->constraints->ramp_disable && old_selector >= 0 - && old_selector != selector) { - + if (!old_selector >= 0 && old_selector != selector) { delay = ops->set_voltage_time_sel(rdev, old_selector, selector); if (delay < 0) { @@ -3051,10 +3049,8 @@ int regulator_set_voltage_time_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev, else if (rdev->desc->ramp_delay) ramp_delay = rdev->desc->ramp_delay; - if (ramp_delay == 0) { - rdev_warn(rdev, "ramp_delay not set\n"); + if (ramp_delay == 0) return 0; - } /* sanity check */ if (!rdev->desc->ops->list_voltage) -- 2.8.1 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Applied "regulator: core: Don't skip set_voltage_time when ramp delay disabled" to the regulator tree Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 18:40:03 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1473871930-99603-3-git-send-email-mka@chromium.org> Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1473871930-99603-3-git-send-email-mka-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Matthias Kaehlcke Cc: Mark Brown Mark Brown , lgirdwood-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, Douglas Anderson , briannorris-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org, javier-0uQlZySMnqxg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org, robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org The patch regulator: core: Don't skip set_voltage_time when ramp delay disabled has been applied to the regulator tree at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark >>From d89564efe79419a093e966a959bf5ba2c94e693f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthias Kaehlcke Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:52:07 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] regulator: core: Don't skip set_voltage_time when ramp delay disabled The current code assumes that only the ramp_delay is used to determine the time needed for the voltage to stabilize. This may be true for the calculation done by regulator_set_voltage_time_sel(), however regulators can implement their own set_voltage_time_sel() op which would be skipped if no ramp delay is specified. Remove the check in _regulator_do_set_voltage(), the functions calculating the ramp delay return 0 anyway when the ramp delay is not configured. Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/regulator/core.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c index b0076ccf896b..df3028b2a8e9 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c @@ -2804,9 +2804,7 @@ static int _regulator_do_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, goto out; /* Call set_voltage_time_sel if successfully obtained old_selector */ - if (!rdev->constraints->ramp_disable && old_selector >= 0 - && old_selector != selector) { - + if (!old_selector >= 0 && old_selector != selector) { delay = ops->set_voltage_time_sel(rdev, old_selector, selector); if (delay < 0) { @@ -3051,10 +3049,8 @@ int regulator_set_voltage_time_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev, else if (rdev->desc->ramp_delay) ramp_delay = rdev->desc->ramp_delay; - if (ramp_delay == 0) { - rdev_warn(rdev, "ramp_delay not set\n"); + if (ramp_delay == 0) return 0; - } /* sanity check */ if (!rdev->desc->ops->list_voltage) -- 2.8.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html