From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2017 19:18:05 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, v4,
 15/66] spl: dm: use CONFIG_IS_ENABLED to test for the DM option
In-Reply-To: <1501706105-7490-16-git-send-email-philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
References: <1501706105-7490-16-git-send-email-philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
Message-ID: <E1dePBl-0006Xq-S8@mail.theobroma-systems.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

> Even though there's now a TPL_DM configuration option, the spl logic
> still checks for SPL_DM and thus does not pick up the proper config
> option.
> 
> This introduces the use of CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(DM) in spl.c to always
> pick up the desired configuration option instead of having a
> hard-coded check for the SPL variant.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v4: None
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2: None
> 
>  common/spl/spl.c        |  5 +++--
>  include/linux/kconfig.h | 13 +++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

Applied to u-boot-rockchip, thanks!