From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id B1149E0034A; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:23:20 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (raj.khem[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.220.49 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com (mail-pa0-f49.google.com [209.85.220.49]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62838E0033D for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:23:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by padbj1 with SMTP id bj1so5169919pad.5 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:23:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=eETRexsQo0FwWf+e9eUvAhE0XGz79ou6Jw/Xvwcdua4=; b=qLvWR3yN4mFvLUpfUFSnYS2wS3RDExW/c7gSIOl3IHLtmKYFJcBmAcr6CvjL5We30l iuJq8NE08K2A4hKwNBNoeNVsx5dsKvTQa8MACgJwsYhOjZt45CL6WdgF/dWzhY3wdPJD ns9ScWYt+nX9In6MKr/+jRKTSOo92jcRYOoiW/DaTZprNxhCzkkCywud934Jdtcq17Wg +zGA9Y7y2P6eutLRWH/WzS1FUT9Sofraq+E4k2pGJ4zO7SGzmBZuqIHDbiuc7PCG4FzX 4aMtaeHxp4t/CQzH7iUGadeIxqa5Z3xW4iFbq1FoXKPlJWbhOqV+lGZLVtLlk3hipgJA QvMQ== X-Received: by 10.66.142.100 with SMTP id rv4mr3217701pab.84.1424305397642; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:23:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:9:3580:84c:ac05:bc97:a5e3:53c? ([2601:9:3580:84c:ac05:bc97:a5e3:53c]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pu10sm17223479pdb.27.2015.02.18.16.23.15 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:23:16 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) From: Khem Raj In-Reply-To: <1424295668.11836.19.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:23:14 -0800 Message-Id: References: <80920FD0-CA08-45D7-9A41-3971FB2D58D7@gmail.com> <1423908404.20217.100.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <1424245575.25541.19.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <1424260309.25541.23.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <1424264807.11836.1.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <3F6EFBD4-AC35-4CE0-B52C-0ABDA0D17838@gmail.com> <1424295668.11836.19.camel@linuxfoundation.org> To: Richard Purdie X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" , openembeded-devel , Dan McGregor , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [OE-core] [RFT] upcoming glibc 2.21 and gcc 4.9 upgrade X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:23:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On Feb 18, 2015, at 1:41 PM, Richard Purdie = wrote: >=20 > On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 10:38 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Feb 18, 2015, at 5:06 AM, Richard Purdie = wrote: >>> On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 11:51 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 01:01 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >>> The series needs: >>>=20 >>> TUNE_CCARGS_x86 :=3D "${@oe_filter_out('-mfpmath=3Dsse', = '${TUNE_CCARGS}', d)}" >>> +TUNE_CCARGS_x86-64 :=3D "${@oe_filter_out('-mfpmath=3Dsse', = '${TUNE_CCARGS}', d)}=E2=80=9D >>>=20 >>=20 >> hmmm I assumed x86 was common across 32bit and 64bit x86 but seems = not so I replaced the old patch instead of appending it=20 >=20 > Thanks, I'll update the patch for the next round. >=20 >>=20 >>> since the x86 override doesn't cover x86_64. I'll queue that and run = yet >>> another build. We do have another poky-tiny issue too: >>>=20 >>> = https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/poky-tiny/builds/204 >>>=20 >>=20 >> OK. I am creating a local config to use tiny config for libc and weed = out remaining build issues for tiny config=20 >=20 > Cool, thanks. >=20 > The next build is in progress and looking greener than the last. Next = up > it appears we still have multilib issues: I have pushed a new patchset to same branch. That should fix the tiny = build issues. >=20 > = https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-multilib/builds= /201 | dcigettext.c: In function '__dcigettext': | dcigettext.c:856:30: error: '__libc_setlocale_lock' undeclared (first = use in this function) | __libc_rwlock_unlock (__libc_setlocale_lock); is what I see. I have fixed this in the latest patchset. So lets start with the new = patchset. > There is a possibility this "from sstate" build may have run into a > problem with sstate but something looks to be wrong with glibc in some > regard. >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Richard >=20 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com (mail-pd0-f172.google.com [209.85.192.172]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE4D71F05; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pdbnh10 with SMTP id nh10so4810704pdb.11; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:23:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=eETRexsQo0FwWf+e9eUvAhE0XGz79ou6Jw/Xvwcdua4=; b=qLvWR3yN4mFvLUpfUFSnYS2wS3RDExW/c7gSIOl3IHLtmKYFJcBmAcr6CvjL5We30l iuJq8NE08K2A4hKwNBNoeNVsx5dsKvTQa8MACgJwsYhOjZt45CL6WdgF/dWzhY3wdPJD ns9ScWYt+nX9In6MKr/+jRKTSOo92jcRYOoiW/DaTZprNxhCzkkCywud934Jdtcq17Wg +zGA9Y7y2P6eutLRWH/WzS1FUT9Sofraq+E4k2pGJ4zO7SGzmBZuqIHDbiuc7PCG4FzX 4aMtaeHxp4t/CQzH7iUGadeIxqa5Z3xW4iFbq1FoXKPlJWbhOqV+lGZLVtLlk3hipgJA QvMQ== X-Received: by 10.66.142.100 with SMTP id rv4mr3217701pab.84.1424305397642; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:23:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:9:3580:84c:ac05:bc97:a5e3:53c? ([2601:9:3580:84c:ac05:bc97:a5e3:53c]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pu10sm17223479pdb.27.2015.02.18.16.23.15 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:23:16 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) From: Khem Raj In-Reply-To: <1424295668.11836.19.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:23:14 -0800 Message-Id: References: <80920FD0-CA08-45D7-9A41-3971FB2D58D7@gmail.com> <1423908404.20217.100.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <1424245575.25541.19.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <1424260309.25541.23.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <1424264807.11836.1.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <3F6EFBD4-AC35-4CE0-B52C-0ABDA0D17838@gmail.com> <1424295668.11836.19.camel@linuxfoundation.org> To: Richard Purdie X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" , openembeded-devel , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [yocto] [RFT] upcoming glibc 2.21 and gcc 4.9 upgrade X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:23:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On Feb 18, 2015, at 1:41 PM, Richard Purdie = wrote: >=20 > On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 10:38 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Feb 18, 2015, at 5:06 AM, Richard Purdie = wrote: >>> On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 11:51 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 01:01 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >>> The series needs: >>>=20 >>> TUNE_CCARGS_x86 :=3D "${@oe_filter_out('-mfpmath=3Dsse', = '${TUNE_CCARGS}', d)}" >>> +TUNE_CCARGS_x86-64 :=3D "${@oe_filter_out('-mfpmath=3Dsse', = '${TUNE_CCARGS}', d)}=E2=80=9D >>>=20 >>=20 >> hmmm I assumed x86 was common across 32bit and 64bit x86 but seems = not so I replaced the old patch instead of appending it=20 >=20 > Thanks, I'll update the patch for the next round. >=20 >>=20 >>> since the x86 override doesn't cover x86_64. I'll queue that and run = yet >>> another build. We do have another poky-tiny issue too: >>>=20 >>> = https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/poky-tiny/builds/204 >>>=20 >>=20 >> OK. I am creating a local config to use tiny config for libc and weed = out remaining build issues for tiny config=20 >=20 > Cool, thanks. >=20 > The next build is in progress and looking greener than the last. Next = up > it appears we still have multilib issues: I have pushed a new patchset to same branch. That should fix the tiny = build issues. >=20 > = https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-multilib/builds= /201 | dcigettext.c: In function '__dcigettext': | dcigettext.c:856:30: error: '__libc_setlocale_lock' undeclared (first = use in this function) | __libc_rwlock_unlock (__libc_setlocale_lock); is what I see. I have fixed this in the latest patchset. So lets start with the new = patchset. > There is a possibility this "from sstate" build may have run into a > problem with sstate but something looks to be wrong with glibc in some > regard. >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Richard >=20 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com (mail-pd0-f172.google.com [209.85.192.172]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE4D71F05; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pdbnh10 with SMTP id nh10so4810704pdb.11; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:23:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=eETRexsQo0FwWf+e9eUvAhE0XGz79ou6Jw/Xvwcdua4=; b=qLvWR3yN4mFvLUpfUFSnYS2wS3RDExW/c7gSIOl3IHLtmKYFJcBmAcr6CvjL5We30l iuJq8NE08K2A4hKwNBNoeNVsx5dsKvTQa8MACgJwsYhOjZt45CL6WdgF/dWzhY3wdPJD ns9ScWYt+nX9In6MKr/+jRKTSOo92jcRYOoiW/DaTZprNxhCzkkCywud934Jdtcq17Wg +zGA9Y7y2P6eutLRWH/WzS1FUT9Sofraq+E4k2pGJ4zO7SGzmBZuqIHDbiuc7PCG4FzX 4aMtaeHxp4t/CQzH7iUGadeIxqa5Z3xW4iFbq1FoXKPlJWbhOqV+lGZLVtLlk3hipgJA QvMQ== X-Received: by 10.66.142.100 with SMTP id rv4mr3217701pab.84.1424305397642; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:23:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:9:3580:84c:ac05:bc97:a5e3:53c? ([2601:9:3580:84c:ac05:bc97:a5e3:53c]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pu10sm17223479pdb.27.2015.02.18.16.23.15 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:23:16 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) From: Khem Raj In-Reply-To: <1424295668.11836.19.camel@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:23:14 -0800 Message-Id: References: <80920FD0-CA08-45D7-9A41-3971FB2D58D7@gmail.com> <1423908404.20217.100.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <1424245575.25541.19.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <1424260309.25541.23.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <1424264807.11836.1.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <3F6EFBD4-AC35-4CE0-B52C-0ABDA0D17838@gmail.com> <1424295668.11836.19.camel@linuxfoundation.org> To: Richard Purdie X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" , openembeded-devel , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [RFT] upcoming glibc 2.21 and gcc 4.9 upgrade X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:23:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On Feb 18, 2015, at 1:41 PM, Richard Purdie = wrote: >=20 > On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 10:38 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Feb 18, 2015, at 5:06 AM, Richard Purdie = wrote: >>> On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 11:51 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 01:01 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: >>> The series needs: >>>=20 >>> TUNE_CCARGS_x86 :=3D "${@oe_filter_out('-mfpmath=3Dsse', = '${TUNE_CCARGS}', d)}" >>> +TUNE_CCARGS_x86-64 :=3D "${@oe_filter_out('-mfpmath=3Dsse', = '${TUNE_CCARGS}', d)}=E2=80=9D >>>=20 >>=20 >> hmmm I assumed x86 was common across 32bit and 64bit x86 but seems = not so I replaced the old patch instead of appending it=20 >=20 > Thanks, I'll update the patch for the next round. >=20 >>=20 >>> since the x86 override doesn't cover x86_64. I'll queue that and run = yet >>> another build. We do have another poky-tiny issue too: >>>=20 >>> = https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/poky-tiny/builds/204 >>>=20 >>=20 >> OK. I am creating a local config to use tiny config for libc and weed = out remaining build issues for tiny config=20 >=20 > Cool, thanks. >=20 > The next build is in progress and looking greener than the last. Next = up > it appears we still have multilib issues: I have pushed a new patchset to same branch. That should fix the tiny = build issues. >=20 > = https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-multilib/builds= /201 | dcigettext.c: In function '__dcigettext': | dcigettext.c:856:30: error: '__libc_setlocale_lock' undeclared (first = use in this function) | __libc_rwlock_unlock (__libc_setlocale_lock); is what I see. I have fixed this in the latest patchset. So lets start with the new = patchset. > There is a possibility this "from sstate" build may have run into a > problem with sstate but something looks to be wrong with glibc in some > regard. >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Richard >=20