From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37703) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIBVB-0003un-Cd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 04:42:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIBV6-0008NT-VV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 04:42:01 -0500 Received: from mail.avalus.com ([89.16.176.221]:50198) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIBV6-0008IN-NE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 04:41:56 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) From: Alex Bligh In-Reply-To: <20161217083436.paqqlsbkjl66frfr@grep.be> Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 09:41:47 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <3D392E31-DDA4-4316-B26D-871E94A83935@alex.org.uk> <20161214201858.lblzw2ayddidxfyp@grep.be> <58F412AB-8A4C-403F-AEE2-D2FB958D447A@alex.org.uk> <20161215150312.dmxrxn7ujzq3apy6@grep.be> <78C8A0CB-717D-4925-8AA8-A085DC1F9FB7@alex.org.uk> <20161215164917.2zzkdwxarf4pnfle@grep.be> <3DDAB833-51BF-4F73-9F08-E50054B01D24@alex.org.uk> <20161216155248.2r2yzthuvn76nprq@grep.be> <82CDF60E-994F-453F-8B34-181C86001A82@alex.org.uk> <20161217083436.paqqlsbkjl66frfr@grep.be> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] [PATCH] Further tidy-up on block status List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Wouter Verhelst Cc: Alex Bligh , "nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net" , Kevin Wolf , Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "Stefan stefanha@redhat. com" , Paolo Bonzini , "Denis V . Lunev" , John Snow > On 17 Dec 2016, at 08:34, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > I've therefore removed that restriction as well as the "255 bytes max" > one that you added, since I don't think they make much sense. That > doesn't mean I can't be convinced otherwise by good arguments, but > they'd have to be very good ones ;-) But we were at cross purposes. I was talking about the return from queries, and you've adjusted namespaces (in toto). I've fixed up your edit slightly, and brought the return for queries in line with it. I hope this nit is now dead! -- Alex Bligh