From: Fam Zheng <zhengfeiran@bytedance.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: "Fam Zheng" <zhengfeiran@bytedance.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, "Linux MM" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
tj@kernel.org, "Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
lizefan@huawei.com, "Vladimir Davydov" <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
duanxiongchun@bytedance.com, 张永肃 <zhangyongsu@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: memory cgroup pagecache and inode problem
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 18:02:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E699E11E-32B9-4061-93BD-54FE52F972BA@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190104090441.GI31793@dhcp22.suse.cz>
> On Jan 4, 2019, at 17:04, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> This is a natural side effect of shared memory, I am afraid. Isolated
> memory cgroups should limit any shared resources to bare minimum. You
> will get "who touches first gets charged" behavior otherwise and that is
> not really deterministic.
I don’t quite understand your comment. I think the current behavior for the ext4_inode_cachep slab family is just “who touches first gets charged”, and later users of the same file from a different mem cgroup can benefit from the cache, keep it from being released, but doesn’t get charged.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-04 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <15614FDC-198E-449B-BFAF-B00D6EF61155@bytedance.com>
2019-01-04 4:44 ` memory cgroup pagecache and inode problem Fam Zheng
2019-01-04 5:00 ` Yang Shi
2019-01-04 5:12 ` Fam Zheng
2019-01-04 19:36 ` Yang Shi
2019-01-07 5:10 ` Fam Zheng
2019-01-07 8:53 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-07 9:01 ` Fam Zheng
2019-01-07 9:13 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-09 4:33 ` Fam Zheng
2019-01-10 5:36 ` Yang Shi
2019-01-10 8:30 ` Fam Zheng
2019-01-10 8:41 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-16 0:50 ` Yang Shi
2019-01-16 3:52 ` Fam Zheng
2019-01-16 7:06 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-16 21:08 ` Yang Shi
2019-01-16 21:06 ` Yang Shi
2019-01-17 2:41 ` Fam Zheng
2019-01-17 5:06 ` Yang Shi
2019-01-19 3:17 ` 段熊春
2019-01-20 23:15 ` Shakeel Butt
2019-01-20 23:15 ` Shakeel Butt
2019-01-20 23:20 ` Shakeel Butt
2019-01-21 10:27 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-04 9:04 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-04 10:02 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2019-01-04 10:12 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-04 10:35 ` Fam Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E699E11E-32B9-4061-93BD-54FE52F972BA@bytedance.com \
--to=zhengfeiran@bytedance.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=zhangyongsu@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.