From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Sony.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-Sony-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=yaXw9p88Lp8LlxmwcOjEtZCKJIPLyAl8xMQiEkSh4+k=; b=LXJ77uBi2exHJC/NOE/VJy1qu3SM6WXHQq4hFB7GR+wD/tnCdD1zThmPU9tzTrb58FLdIpRVAN9y0gicMOV+qP/RJNPITRZ6xmG0PiB48fNxEd5Grqm81iIJsHrvmApVNhVUEVWA6Rb+2kMIV7iUVs7BIPDfMGtQm6CO9bEPkB0= From: "Bird, Timothy" Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 17:27:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1509438715-14039-1-git-send-email-daniel.sangorrin@toshiba.co.jp> <006f01d35223$d1415890$73c409b0$@toshiba.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <006f01d35223$d1415890$73c409b0$@toshiba.co.jp> Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Fuego] cyclictest patches List-Id: Mailing list for the Fuego test framework List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Daniel Sangorrin , "fuego@lists.linuxfoundation.org" > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Sangorrin on Tuesday, October 31, 2017 9:40 AM > > -----Original Message----- > > From: fuego-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org [mailto:fuego- > bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Sangorrin > > I have modified the cyclictest benchmark test. > > > > - cyclictest: update source code tarball > > > > The previous source code was too old and lacked some important > > flags. I added a patch to build the test for toolchains based on > > old kernels (maybe this should be upstream) > > > > TODO: rt-tests contains other tests that are already in Fuego > > and can share the same tarball. > > TODO: cyclictest requires some disturbance running in > > background. >=20 > Note: this patch is on my master branch (it was too big for the mailing l= ist). Is this tarball made on your system, or does it come from some public sourc= e? In general, I'd like to avoid custom-made tarballs in Fuego. If it's normal cyclictest source, with some extra custom sauce, I think it would be better to keep the 2 parts separate, so it's easier to update. I'll take a look and let you know what I think. -- Tim