From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Sony.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-Sony-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=7AQDV8nvMGYcEfQm99r/5edgjg1bSF82OHfXWzhcEEc=; b=LdEmsf4GMs+GPC4/9759/qjfYdp2zfXaAod0zLDXJEpxQHXkI17IN8VvOxtB/YoyRQETY6topPm4rHJ577CDeDL6wfe3GufBNH/PJSeVbzK+g18FxPxSH5oa9UUT7vInPKL0g2OH9GMnys/heaBr7WadsTI1VGJc29S8T4Bt9o4= From: "Bird, Timothy" Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 19:32:08 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1509438715-14039-1-git-send-email-daniel.sangorrin@toshiba.co.jp> <006f01d35223$d1415890$73c409b0$@toshiba.co.jp> In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Fuego] cyclictest patches List-Id: Mailing list for the Fuego test framework List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Bird, Timothy" , Daniel Sangorrin , "fuego@lists.linuxfoundation.org" > -----Original Message----- > From: fuego-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org [mailto:fuego- > bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Bird, Timothy > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 6:28 PM > To: Daniel Sangorrin ; > fuego@lists.linuxfoundation.org > Subject: Re: [Fuego] cyclictest patches >=20 >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Daniel Sangorrin on Tuesday, October 31, 2017 9:40 AM > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: fuego-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org [mailto:fuego- > > bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Sangorrin > > > I have modified the cyclictest benchmark test. > > > > > > - cyclictest: update source code tarball > > > > > > The previous source code was too old and lacked some important > > > flags. I added a patch to build the test for toolchains based on > > > old kernels (maybe this should be upstream) > > > > > > TODO: rt-tests contains other tests that are already in Fuego > > > and can share the same tarball. > > > TODO: cyclictest requires some disturbance running in > > > background. > > > > Note: this patch is on my master branch (it was too big for the mailing= list). >=20 > Is this tarball made on your system, or does it come from some public > source? Looks like it comes straight from the upstream git repo. I don't see an online (upstream) source for the tarball. Is there some reason we're not doing the following? diff --git a/engine/tests/Benchmark.cyclictest/fuego_test.sh b/engine/tests= /Benchmark.cyclictest/fuego_test.sh index a32eb6e..f7c6350 100755 --- a/engine/tests/Benchmark.cyclictest/fuego_test.sh +++ b/engine/tests/Benchmark.cyclictest/fuego_test.sh @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ -tarball=3Drt-tests-1.0.tar.gz +gitrepo=3Dhttps://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/rt-tests/rt-tests.git +gitref=3Dstable/v1.0 =20 function test_build { patch -p1 -N -s < $TEST_HOME/0001-Add-scheduling-policies-for-old-kernels= .patch Just checking. That seemed to work OK for me. I presume that the gitrepo mentioned above is the canonical upstream source. -- Tim