From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mailhost.actiasodielec.fr ([89.91.64.97]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Wrife-0006mv-L6 for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 06:58:07 +0000 From: Vu Hai NGUYEN Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 08:51:01 +0200 Subject: RE : RE : RE : RE : ath10k: firmware crash in station mode & problem DFS Message-ID: References: <1399565896-29791-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> <87lhttwyos.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> , , , <5386059B.7040301@candelatech.com> , <53889A89.90802@candelatech.com> , <538CAACA.2030202@candelatech.com> In-Reply-To: <538CAACA.2030202@candelatech.com> Content-Language: fr-FR MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Ben Greear Cc: Janusz Dziedzic , Patrick CARNEIRO RODRIGUEZ , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" , Janusz Dziedzic >I could try building a set of binaries and let you bisect the problem, perhaps. >This might take a bit of your time, but if you are willing, I will write a script >to create firmware binaries for each of my commits so you can do a manual >bisect. >I also think that the '2-1' part of the upstream 10.1 firmware is not in the source code >QCA made available to me, so there may be upstream fixes I have not seen, and possibly >part of that enables/fixes DFS. >I am not aware of any changes in my firmware that should have broken >DFS, but of course with 100+ commits, I could have easily added regressions... Yes, I'll try it, you can explain it to me if I don't know how to apply your script? NGUYEN Vu Hai Acita-Sodielec Route de Mayres - B.P. 9 12100 St GEORGES DE LUZENCON FRANCE _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k