From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Brandeburg, Jesse" Subject: RE: e1000e NVM mutex contention warnings Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:15:02 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1240147024.3384.20.camel@deadeye.i.decadent.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" , "524699@bugs.debian.org" <524699@bugs.debian.org>, "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: Ben Hutchings , "Graham, David" Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:36226 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753390AbZDWWPF convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:15:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1240147024.3384.20.camel@deadeye.i.decadent.org.uk> Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Ben Hutchings wrote: > What's your plan for collecting information about NVM mutex contention > and when do you intend to remove the warnings? I have to say I find > this way of testing very user-unfriendly and would like to see it gone > as soon as possible. Hi Ben, checking linus' tree and davem's current net-2.6 tree shows that the code was removed as of commit: 0a834a36ac92375cd82d9e4fe4f571e257997d6a it was put in 2/14/2009, and was included in 2.6.30-rc1 by linus. are you suggesting that we maybe try to push to -stable too? Jesse