From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0113CC04AAC for ; Mon, 20 May 2019 17:17:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A218820815 for ; Mon, 20 May 2019 17:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=jilayne.com header.i=@jilayne.com header.b="NBcrzTrs" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2392753AbfETRRF (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 May 2019 13:17:05 -0400 Received: from mx2-c1.supremebox.com ([198.23.53.234]:35172 "EHLO mx1.supremebox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390305AbfETRRF (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 May 2019 13:17:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jilayne.com ; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date: In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=W65hR/dV+XWUtd7TsXBjL07kX0Gt3C4poqI0Fyy8uj0=; b=NBcrzTrs+Q6bMbsUf7c1tPmlX0 4meKyD27Sf7ABcsfe3iptC5NIkB8rORbEv7vvEmHHMn2za4kEOlbWA9OBKC6o7IgILwvEdQJG+h4m DPGC7Rs3wsdPivgrD9cEoyFMvdCVIDNNJ6zHM2BwsacK3KGI7oSdGtSinkZZWGsZhjSU=; Received: from [67.164.173.226] (helo=[10.0.0.176]) by mx1.supremebox.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hSluJ-000BMR-OR; Mon, 20 May 2019 17:17:03 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\)) Subject: Re: [patch 02/25] treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 2 From: J Lovejoy In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 11:17:02 -0600 Cc: Allison Randal , linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20190519135130.462579320@linutronix.de> <20190519154040.743319710@linutronix.de> To: Thomas Gleixner X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8) X-Sender-Ident-agJab5osgicCis: opensource@jilayne.com Sender: linux-spdx-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org > On May 19, 2019, at 10:00 PM, Thomas Gleixner = wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Sun, 19 May 2019, Allison Randal wrote: >=20 >> Since the text says "gnu *library* general public license", shouldn't >> the SPDX license identifier be LGPL instead of GPL? >=20 > Well spotted indeed. is anyone else concerned that the scanner(s) didn=E2=80=99t = catch this? This is the kind of thing that (I think) would have been = caught. Considering that we have to rely on the tooling to a certain = degree (i.e. we can=E2=80=99t possibly look at every file individually), = this has me a bit worried=E2=80=A6 Jilayne