From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Prafulla Wadaskar Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 23:39:11 -0700 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7] dreamplug: initial board support. In-Reply-To: <20110913141723.GB24172@titan.lakedaemon.net> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason [mailto:u-boot at lakedaemon.net] > Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 7:47 PM > To: Wolfgang Denk > Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; Albert Aribaud; u-boot at lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7] dreamplug: initial board support. > > Albert, > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 03:00:59PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Dear Prafulla, > > > > In message VEXCH4.marvell.com> you wrote: > > > > > > Let's have Wolfgang's opinion on this, since this not aligned with > current > > > u-boot development strategy. > > > > > > May be we can create a separate header file for tracking > (unsupported/tobe > > > supported) arm machine-types. > > > > Actually this is for Albert to comment. He is the ARM custodian and > > has to live with the results. > > Wolfgang, Marek Vasut, and I discussed this here [1]. To summarize, by > declaring non-mainlined mach_types in the respective board config, an > error will be thrown at compile time after mach-types.h is updated to > include the mach_type. > > The other idea is to have a separate file, say mach-types-local.h where > all non-mainlined mach-types would be defined. I will vote for this second approach so that it becomes independent change and anyone can update it in future. Let's get Albert's opinion on this. Regards.. Prafulla . . > > Thoughts? I can do whichever. > > thx, > > Jason. > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot at lists.denx.de/msg60921.html