From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030556AbXAaT0G (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:26:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030560AbXAaT0F (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:26:05 -0500 Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]:47251 "EHLO agminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030556AbXAaT0D (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:26:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20070131175118.GN1344@kvack.org> References: <1170209044.26655.364.camel@localhost.localdomain> <6CDD5D9D-E031-499D-9A8A-5A8522C66D37@oracle.com> <20070131175118.GN1344@kvack.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org, Suparna Bhattacharya , Linus Torvalds Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Zach Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] Generic AIO by scheduling stacks Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:25:30 -0800 To: Benjamin LaHaise X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > without linking it into the system lists. The reason I don't think > this > approach works (and I looked at it a few times) is that many things > end > up requiring special handling: things like permissions, signals, > FPU state, > segment registers.... Can you share a specific example of the special handling required? - z