From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com ([74.125.82.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RcOG2-0003Zh-Rt for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 22:26:58 +0100 Received: by werm13 with SMTP id m13so1058390wer.6 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:19:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.139.155 with SMTP id c27mr5887629wej.37.1324243196795; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:19:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.20.1.19] (ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl. [84.80.112.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fy13sm23209384wbb.18.2011.12.18.13.19.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:19:56 -0800 (PST) From: Koen Kooi Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 22:19:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <1324237652-15618-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> <5C0105D4-44BE-4584-9ED9-36970B91A34C@dominion.thruhere.net> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] kernel.bbclass: move uImage handling to separate task X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:26:59 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 14410 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DD359FA1-B1E0-477A-8985-9C45B09E11BD"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 --Apple-Mail=_DD359FA1-B1E0-477A-8985-9C45B09E11BD Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Op 18 dec. 2011, om 21:27 heeft Bruce Ashfield het volgende geschreven: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Koen Kooi = wrote: >>=20 >> Op 18 dec. 2011, om 20:47 heeft Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov het volgende = geschreven: >>=20 >>> As per org.oe.dev and meta-oe's kernel.bbclass move uImage creation = to >>> separate task from do_deploy. This way the do_install task can also >>> benefit from generated uImage. >>>=20 >>> The only major feature of oe-core's version (not to recreate uImage >>> if it exists) is retained in this patch. >>=20 >> I still don't agree with that behaviour. The in-kernel uImage code is = just like the in-kernel defconfigs: useless for people who aren't kernel = developers. >=20 > In that case, shouldn't people doing u-boot development (or other > non-kernel developers), > be building a uImage via something that isn't in kernel.bbclass ? I use the kernel.bbclass in meta-oe, that does what I need.= --Apple-Mail=_DD359FA1-B1E0-477A-8985-9C45B09E11BD Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAk7uWPsACgkQMkyGM64RGpHe8ACdEdFi1Nh17keaiRxAAWQI3Rh6 2CYAoKcYow2t+pnGOlJs7teSNB4IQARn =3QuN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_DD359FA1-B1E0-477A-8985-9C45B09E11BD--