All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chauhan, Madhav" <madhav.chauhan@intel.com>
To: "Kulkarni, Vandita" <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Nikula, Jani" <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Zanoni, Paulo R" <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] drm/i915/icl: Calculate DPLL params for DSI
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 12:29:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <FDE0F82259988449BC0C053E4EF090C96EF53A6B@BGSMSX104.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57510F3E2013164E925CD03ED7512A3B7F41907B@BGSMSX108.gar.corp.intel.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Kulkarni, Vandita
> Sent: Monday, October 1, 2018 5:00 PM
> To: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Nikula, Jani <jani.nikula@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org;
> Zanoni, Paulo R <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 3/3] drm/i915/icl: Calculate DPLL params for DSI
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 7:52 PM
> > To: Kulkarni, Vandita <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Nikula, Jani
> > <jani.nikula@intel.com>; Zanoni, Paulo R <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 3/3] drm/i915/icl: Calculate DPLL params
> > for DSI
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 08:49:52AM +0000, Kulkarni, Vandita wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > > Sent: Friday, September 14, 2018 9:39 PM
> > > > To: Kulkarni, Vandita <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Nikula, Jani
> > > > <jani.nikula@intel.com>; Zanoni, Paulo R
> > > > <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC 3/3] drm/i915/icl: Calculate DPLL
> > > > params for DSI
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:24:14PM +0530, Vandita Kulkarni wrote:
> > > > > From: Madhav Chauhan <madhav.chauhan@intel.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch calculate various DPLL dividers and parameters for
> > > > > DSI encoder and adjust AFE clock for DSI. For DSI, 8x clock is AFE clock.
> > > > >
> > > > > v2: Extend haswell_crtc_compute_clock() for Gen11 DSI
> > > > > v3: Rebase
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Madhav Chauhan <madhav.chauhan@intel.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c  | 4 +++-
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 7 ++++++-
> > > > >  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > > > index 6928dcc..1a44c5e 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > > > @@ -9238,10 +9238,12 @@ void hsw_disable_pc8(struct
> > > > > drm_i915_private
> > > > > *dev_priv)  static int haswell_crtc_compute_clock(struct intel_crtc
> *crtc,
> > > > >  				      struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)  {
> > > > > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> > > > >  	struct intel_atomic_state *state =
> > > > >  		to_intel_atomic_state(crtc_state->base.state);
> > > > >
> > > > > -	if (!intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_DSI)) {
> > > > > +	if (!intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_DSI) ||
> > > > > +				 IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv)) {
> > > > >  		struct intel_encoder *encoder =
> > > > >  			intel_get_crtc_new_encoder(state, crtc_state);
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > > > > index 36ed155..5175e44 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> > > > > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> > > > >   */
> > > > >
> > > > >  #include "intel_drv.h"
> > > > > +#include "intel_dsi.h"
> > > > >
> > > > >  /**
> > > > >   * DOC: Display PLLs
> > > > > @@ -2532,7 +2533,11 @@ static bool icl_calc_dpll_state(struct
> > > > intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> > > > >  		ret = icl_calc_tbt_pll(dev_priv, clock, &pll_params);
> > > > >  	else if (intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI))
> > > > >  		ret = cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(clock, dev_priv, &pll_params);
> > > > > -	else
> > > > > +	else if (encoder->type == INTEL_OUTPUT_DSI) {
> > > > > +		struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi =
> enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base);
> > > > > +		ret = cnl_ddi_calculate_wrpll(intel_dsi-
> >bitrate_khz/5,
> > > >
> > > > Missing port_clock=whatever in compute config?
> > > As per the spec I see that for mipi dsi on icl, 8x clock = AFE clock.
> > > And 8x clock is calculated and stored already as pixel_clk * bpp /
> > > lane_count Hence we are using already calculate 8x clock variable
> > > here and divide by/5 because later in the function it gets
> > > multiplied by 5 for afe
> > clock.
> > >
> > > port_clock is assigned to pixel clock as I see.
> >
> > port_clock can basically be anything you want. It's really up to the
> > encoder to define it. For DP it's the freq (1.62ghz, 2.7ghz, etc.),
> > for HDMI it's the TMDS character rate, for SDVO it's the multiplied pixel
> clock, etc.
> >
> > I suppose that means that currently port_clock is the output from the
> > dpll in pretty much all cases. Sticking to that same rule will make
> > DSI look less special and thus easier to understand for everyone.
> 
> Thank you, I will assign this bitrate_khz  (dsi_clk) to port_clock.

Please make sure we are not breaking anything else by doing this as there will be assumption
In DSI code that this is the pixelclk.
And still you need to divide it by 5 before passing to caller,
for DSI AFE clock  = 8X clock or Bitrate
which is different for HDMI where AFE Clock = symbol_clock_freq * 5.

Regards,
Madhav

> 
> Regards,
> Vandita
> >
> > > Please let me know if we have to use math around the port clock and
> > > pass that
> > value, than passing 8x clock.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Vandita
> > > >
> > > > > +					      dev_priv, &pll_params);
> > > > > +	} else
> > > > >  		ret = icl_calc_dp_combo_pll(dev_priv, clock, &pll_params);
> > > > >
> > > > >  	if (!ret)
> > > > > --
> > > > > 1.9.1
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > > > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Ville Syrjälä
> > > > Intel
> >
> > --
> > Ville Syrjälä
> > Intel
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-01 12:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-14  6:54 [RFC 0/3] Enable ICL DSI PLL Vandita Kulkarni
2018-09-14  6:54 ` [RFC 1/3] drm/i915/icl: Restructure ICL DPLL enable functionality Vandita Kulkarni
2018-09-14 16:06   ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-09-19 17:31     ` Kulkarni, Vandita
2018-09-26 14:26       ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-01  6:38         ` Kulkarni, Vandita
2018-10-03  7:54     ` Jani Nikula
2018-10-03  8:00       ` Jani Nikula
2018-10-03 11:41         ` Jani Nikula
2018-10-04  2:49           ` Kulkarni, Vandita
2018-10-04  9:01             ` Jani Nikula
2018-09-14  6:54 ` [RFC 2/3] drm/i915/icl: Enable Gen11 DSI PLL Vandita Kulkarni
2018-09-14  6:54 ` [RFC 3/3] drm/i915/icl: Calculate DPLL params for DSI Vandita Kulkarni
2018-09-14 16:09   ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-09-20  8:49     ` Kulkarni, Vandita
2018-09-26 14:21       ` Ville Syrjälä
2018-10-01 11:30         ` Kulkarni, Vandita
2018-10-01 12:29           ` Chauhan, Madhav [this message]
2018-09-14  9:32 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Enable ICL DSI PLL Patchwork
2018-10-03  7:58 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Enable ICL DSI PLL (rev2) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=FDE0F82259988449BC0C053E4EF090C96EF53A6B@BGSMSX104.gar.corp.intel.com \
    --to=madhav.chauhan@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
    --cc=vandita.kulkarni@intel.com \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.