From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2534C8112C for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 06:31:15 -0600 (CST) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Jan 2011 04:31:14 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,385,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="651710167" Received: from rrsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.31.0.57]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Jan 2011 04:31:14 -0800 Received: from rrsmsx606.amr.corp.intel.com (10.31.1.130) by rrsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com (10.31.0.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 05:31:14 -0700 Received: from rrsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.31.0.31]) by RRSMSX606.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.31.1.130]) with mapi; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 05:31:14 -0700 From: "Lorenzati, Marcelo" To: Darren Hart Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 05:31:12 -0700 Thread-Topic: [yocto] ulibc instead of glibc Thread-Index: Acu9oFilpk8cTYdiQUuggQyVveR3wQAAB7YQ Message-ID: References: <4D409288.90903@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4D409288.90903@linux.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: ulibc instead of glibc X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:31:15 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Darren, I'm just trying to estimate the minimal footprint that can be achieved for= an image with a basic set of features in order to have a comparison. In march I'll participate in a local academia event in Argentina and I'll b= e talking about Yocto, so I have anticipated that this kind of questions wo= uld be in place. =09 -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@linux.intel.com]=20 Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 6:31 PM To: Lorenzati, Marcelo Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] ulibc instead of glibc On 01/25/2011 10:36 AM, Lorenzati, Marcelo wrote: > Hi all, > > I wanted to know if it's feasible to build Yocto with ulibc instead of > glibc and if someone have tried. > > In a really constrained system could be the difference between selecting > RT Linux or another real time OS. What size of an image are you hoping to achieve? --=20 Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel