* 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
@ 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
[NOTE:
The summary report of post-2.6.32 regressions will be sent later
(hopefully tomorrow).]
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.33,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us
know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know
if any of the entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
the issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2010-04-07 48 35 33
2010-03-21 15 13 10
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15719
Subject : virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox
Submitter : Thomas Müller <thomas@mathtm.de>
Date : 2010-03-27 14:32 (12 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9ab86bbcf8be755256f0a5e994e0b38af6b4d399
Message-ID : <4BAE1707.2050803@mathtm.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970039227740&w=4
Handled-By : Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718
Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774
Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5
Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802@panasas.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4
Handled-By : Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717
Subject : bluetooth oops
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (25 days old)
Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059@elf.ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4
Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716
Subject : ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1
Submitter : Andrew Benton <b3nton@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-11 16:57 (28 days old)
Message-ID : <4B992110.2090300@gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126832670609705&w=4
Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715
Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio
Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26
Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4
Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713
Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (14 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864
Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4
Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712
Subject : [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-04-01 6:06 (7 days old)
Message-ID : <20100401060624.GA1329@ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127010200817402&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15711
Subject : 2.6.34-rc3, BUG at mm/slab.c:2989
Submitter : Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
Date : 2010-04-01 17:52 (7 days old)
Message-ID : <20100401175225.GA6581@fancy-poultry.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127014437406250&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704
Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (8 days old)
Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674
Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure...
Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old)
Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673
Subject : 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"?
Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Date : 2010-03-28 11:31 (11 days old)
Message-ID : <1269775909.5301.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126977593326800&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15672
Subject : KVM bug, git bisected
Submitter : Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-27 12:43 (12 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/5beb49305251e5669852ed541e8e2f2f7696c53e
Message-ID : <4BADFD74.8060904@gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126969385121711&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15671
Subject : intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung)
Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Date : 2010-03-27 16:11 (12 days old)
Message-ID : <20100327161104.GA12043@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970883105262&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15669
Subject : INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check()
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-08 1:26 (31 days old)
Message-ID : <c4e36d111003250348q678eb2e6w4f3e8133e7fd6e58@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126801163107713&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15668
Subject : start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early
Submitter : Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
Date : 2010-03-25 19:53 (14 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/773e3eb7b81e5ba13b5155dfb3bb75b8ce37f8f9
Message-ID : <20100325194100.GA2364@debian>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954607216519&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15664
Subject : Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled
Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec>
Date : 2010-04-01 01:09 (7 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15661
Subject : PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64
Submitter : Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>
Date : 2010-03-26 15:29 (13 days old)
Message-ID : <1269617372.3779.234.camel@localhost>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126961739803949&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15659
Subject : [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung
Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-25 20:04 (14 days old)
Message-ID : <201003252104.24965.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954749618319&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15655
Subject : corrupt ext3 fs and partial freeze
Submitter : Alban Browaeys <prahal@yahoo.com>
Date : 2010-03-30 08:25 (9 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Subject : BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date : 2010-03-18 22:22 (21 days old)
Message-ID : <4BA2A7A9.4080503@oracle.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126895098217351&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15624
Subject : [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation
Submitter : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-18 4:49 (21 days old)
Message-ID : <20100318044930.GC5045@nowhere>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126888780031992&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15619
Subject : Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected
Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-17 21:58 (22 days old)
Message-ID : <b637ec0b1003171458t524d168fiab52ce2b3431e3c9@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126886311908558&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15615
Subject : NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking
Submitter : Amit Shah <shahamit@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-23 04:04 (16 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15611
Subject : Failure with the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel
Submitter : Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@amcc.com>
Date : 2010-03-16 15:45 (23 days old)
Message-ID : <AC311A8E81420D4EBC1F26E6479848FE065B7D3D@SDCEXCHANGE01.ad.amcc.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126875435718396&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15610
Subject : fsck leads to swapper - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference & panic
Submitter : Ozgur Yuksel <ozgur.yuksel@oracle.com>
Date : 2010-03-22 15:59 (17 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15603
Subject : lockdep warning at boot time when determining whether to resume
Submitter : Sami Liedes <sliedes@cc.hut.fi>
Date : 2010-03-22 00:03 (17 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15601
Subject : [BUG] SLOB breaks Crypto
Submitter : michael-dev@fami-braun.de
Date : 2010-03-15 13:39 (24 days old)
Message-ID : <4B9E38AF.70309@fami-braun.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866044724539&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15600
Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1
Submitter : Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Date : 2010-03-15 15:28 (24 days old)
Message-ID : <4B9E5211.9000204@redhat.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866691701926&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-03-14 7:58 (25 days old)
Message-ID : <20100314075831.GA13457@elf.ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (26 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15553
Subject : Screen backlight doesn't come back on after lid was closed (GM45)
Submitter : <bugs@kaijauch.de>
Date : 2010-03-17 14:35 (22 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15551
Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/work.c:811 ieee80211_work_work+0x7f/0xde8 [mac80211]()
Submitter : Alex Zhavnerchik <alex.vizor@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-16 22:03 (23 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518
Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit
Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Date : 2010-03-11 15:37 (28 days old)
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505
Subject : No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date : 2010-03-10 06:59 (29 days old)
Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505#c11
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480
Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs
Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com>
Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old)
Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.33,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15310
Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that
should be added to the list in there.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
@ 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
[NOTE:
The summary report of post-2.6.32 regressions will be sent later
(hopefully tomorrow).]
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.33,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us
know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know
if any of the entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
the issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2010-04-07 48 35 33
2010-03-21 15 13 10
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15719
Subject : virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox
Submitter : Thomas Müller <thomas@mathtm.de>
Date : 2010-03-27 14:32 (12 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9ab86bbcf8be755256f0a5e994e0b38af6b4d399
Message-ID : <4BAE1707.2050803@mathtm.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970039227740&w=4
Handled-By : Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718
Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774
Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5
Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802@panasas.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4
Handled-By : Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717
Subject : bluetooth oops
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (25 days old)
Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059@elf.ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4
Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716
Subject : ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1
Submitter : Andrew Benton <b3nton@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-11 16:57 (28 days old)
Message-ID : <4B992110.2090300@gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126832670609705&w=4
Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715
Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio
Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26
Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4
Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713
Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (14 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864
Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4
Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712
Subject : [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-04-01 6:06 (7 days old)
Message-ID : <20100401060624.GA1329@ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127010200817402&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15711
Subject : 2.6.34-rc3, BUG at mm/slab.c:2989
Submitter : Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
Date : 2010-04-01 17:52 (7 days old)
Message-ID : <20100401175225.GA6581@fancy-poultry.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127014437406250&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704
Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (8 days old)
Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674
Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure...
Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old)
Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673
Subject : 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"?
Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Date : 2010-03-28 11:31 (11 days old)
Message-ID : <1269775909.5301.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126977593326800&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15672
Subject : KVM bug, git bisected
Submitter : Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-27 12:43 (12 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/5beb49305251e5669852ed541e8e2f2f7696c53e
Message-ID : <4BADFD74.8060904@gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126969385121711&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15671
Subject : intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung)
Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Date : 2010-03-27 16:11 (12 days old)
Message-ID : <20100327161104.GA12043@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970883105262&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15669
Subject : INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check()
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-08 1:26 (31 days old)
Message-ID : <c4e36d111003250348q678eb2e6w4f3e8133e7fd6e58@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126801163107713&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15668
Subject : start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early
Submitter : Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
Date : 2010-03-25 19:53 (14 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/773e3eb7b81e5ba13b5155dfb3bb75b8ce37f8f9
Message-ID : <20100325194100.GA2364@debian>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954607216519&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15664
Subject : Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled
Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec>
Date : 2010-04-01 01:09 (7 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15661
Subject : PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64
Submitter : Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>
Date : 2010-03-26 15:29 (13 days old)
Message-ID : <1269617372.3779.234.camel@localhost>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126961739803949&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15659
Subject : [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung
Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-25 20:04 (14 days old)
Message-ID : <201003252104.24965.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954749618319&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15655
Subject : corrupt ext3 fs and partial freeze
Submitter : Alban Browaeys <prahal@yahoo.com>
Date : 2010-03-30 08:25 (9 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Subject : BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date : 2010-03-18 22:22 (21 days old)
Message-ID : <4BA2A7A9.4080503@oracle.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126895098217351&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15624
Subject : [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation
Submitter : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-18 4:49 (21 days old)
Message-ID : <20100318044930.GC5045@nowhere>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126888780031992&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15619
Subject : Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected
Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-17 21:58 (22 days old)
Message-ID : <b637ec0b1003171458t524d168fiab52ce2b3431e3c9@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126886311908558&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15615
Subject : NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking
Submitter : Amit Shah <shahamit@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-23 04:04 (16 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15611
Subject : Failure with the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel
Submitter : Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@amcc.com>
Date : 2010-03-16 15:45 (23 days old)
Message-ID : <AC311A8E81420D4EBC1F26E6479848FE065B7D3D@SDCEXCHANGE01.ad.amcc.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126875435718396&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15610
Subject : fsck leads to swapper - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference & panic
Submitter : Ozgur Yuksel <ozgur.yuksel@oracle.com>
Date : 2010-03-22 15:59 (17 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15603
Subject : lockdep warning at boot time when determining whether to resume
Submitter : Sami Liedes <sliedes@cc.hut.fi>
Date : 2010-03-22 00:03 (17 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15601
Subject : [BUG] SLOB breaks Crypto
Submitter : michael-dev@fami-braun.de
Date : 2010-03-15 13:39 (24 days old)
Message-ID : <4B9E38AF.70309@fami-braun.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866044724539&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15600
Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1
Submitter : Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Date : 2010-03-15 15:28 (24 days old)
Message-ID : <4B9E5211.9000204@redhat.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866691701926&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-03-14 7:58 (25 days old)
Message-ID : <20100314075831.GA13457@elf.ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (26 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15553
Subject : Screen backlight doesn't come back on after lid was closed (GM45)
Submitter : <bugs@kaijauch.de>
Date : 2010-03-17 14:35 (22 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15551
Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/work.c:811 ieee80211_work_work+0x7f/0xde8 [mac80211]()
Submitter : Alex Zhavnerchik <alex.vizor@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-16 22:03 (23 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518
Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit
Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Date : 2010-03-11 15:37 (28 days old)
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505
Subject : No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date : 2010-03-10 06:59 (29 days old)
Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505#c11
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480
Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs
Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com>
Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old)
Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.33,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15310
Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that
should be added to the list in there.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15480] [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Bjorn Helgaas, Yanko Kaneti
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480
Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs
Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com>
Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old)
Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15480] [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs
@ 2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Bjorn Helgaas, Yanko Kaneti
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480
Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs
Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti-jUE9FD3ILm5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old)
Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15480] [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 22:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2010-04-07 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Yanko Kaneti
On Wednesday 07 April 2010 03:08:37 pm Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480
> Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs
> Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com>
> Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old)
> Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512
This should be closed. The fix is in Linus' tree:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d558b483d5a73f5718705b270cb2090f66ea48c8
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15480] [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs
@ 2010-04-07 22:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2010-04-07 22:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Yanko Kaneti
On Wednesday 07 April 2010 03:08:37 pm Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480
> Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs
> Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti-jUE9FD3ILm5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old)
> Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512
This should be closed. The fix is in Linus' tree:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d558b483d5a73f5718705b270cb2090f66ea48c8
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15480] [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs
@ 2010-04-08 19:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Helgaas
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Yanko Kaneti
On Thursday 08 April 2010, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 April 2010 03:08:37 pm Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480
> > Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs
> > Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old)
> > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
> > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512
>
> This should be closed. The fix is in Linus' tree:
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d558b483d5a73f5718705b270cb2090f66ea48c8
Thanks, closing.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15553] Screen backlight doesn't come back on after lid was closed (GM45)
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, bugs
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15553
Subject : Screen backlight doesn't come back on after lid was closed (GM45)
Submitter : <bugs@kaijauch.de>
Date : 2010-03-17 14:35 (22 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15553] Screen backlight doesn't come back on after lid was closed (GM45)
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, bugs
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15553
Subject : Screen backlight doesn't come back on after lid was closed (GM45)
Submitter : <bugs@kaijauch.de>
Date : 2010-03-17 14:35 (22 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15505] No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Casteyde,
Jesse Barnes, Yinghai Lu
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505
Subject : No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date : 2010-03-10 06:59 (29 days old)
Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505#c11
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15518] CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Daniel Vetter
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518
Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit
Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Date : 2010-03-11 15:37 (28 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* [Bug #15551] WARNING: at net/mac80211/work.c:811 ieee80211_work_work+0x7f/0xde8 [mac80211]()
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Zhavnerchik
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15551
Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/work.c:811 ieee80211_work_work+0x7f/0xde8 [mac80211]()
Submitter : Alex Zhavnerchik <alex.vizor@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-16 22:03 (23 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15551] WARNING: at net/mac80211/work.c:811 ieee80211_work_work+0x7f/0xde8 [mac80211]()
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Zhavnerchik
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15551
Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/work.c:811 ieee80211_work_work+0x7f/0xde8 [mac80211]()
Submitter : Alex Zhavnerchik <alex.vizor-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-03-16 22:03 (23 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15600] CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Avi Kivity
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15600
Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1
Submitter : Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Date : 2010-03-15 15:28 (24 days old)
Message-ID : <4B9E5211.9000204@redhat.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866691701926&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (26 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* [Bug #15603] lockdep warning at boot time when determining whether to resume
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Sami Liedes
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15603
Subject : lockdep warning at boot time when determining whether to resume
Submitter : Sami Liedes <sliedes@cc.hut.fi>
Date : 2010-03-22 00:03 (17 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15603] lockdep warning at boot time when determining whether to resume
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Sami Liedes
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15603
Subject : lockdep warning at boot time when determining whether to resume
Submitter : Sami Liedes <sliedes-kf+aQKke1yb1KXRcyAk9cg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-03-22 00:03 (17 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15590] 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Pavel Machek
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-03-14 7:58 (25 days old)
Message-ID : <20100314075831.GA13457@elf.ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15601] [BUG] SLOB breaks Crypto
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, michael-dev@fami-braun.de
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15601
Subject : [BUG] SLOB breaks Crypto
Submitter : michael-dev@fami-braun.de
Date : 2010-03-15 13:39 (24 days old)
Message-ID : <4B9E38AF.70309@fami-braun.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866044724539&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* [Bug #15615] NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Amit Shah
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15615
Subject : NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking
Submitter : Amit Shah <shahamit@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-23 04:04 (16 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15615] NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Amit Shah
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15615
Subject : NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking
Submitter : Amit Shah <shahamit-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-03-23 04:04 (16 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15615] NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking
2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-08 7:16 ` Liang Li
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Liang Li @ 2010-04-08 7:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Amit Shah
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:48PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
The bug still there. I just met it. And seems its quite simple to get it
fixed.
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index a3dff1f..2df1a76 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
*/
static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p)
{
- return unlikely((p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING));
+ return unlikely(p && (p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING));
}
/*
But seems commitid 0017d735092844118bef006696a750a0e4ef6ebd in tip tree
also touched task_is_waking. So the patch for tip tree should be:
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 3acf694..d259641 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
*/
static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p)
{
- return unlikely(p->state == TASK_WAKING);
+ return unlikely(p && p->state == TASK_WAKING);
}
/*
Regards,
-Liang Li
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15615
> Subject : NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking
> Submitter : Amit Shah <shahamit@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-03-23 04:04 (16 days old)
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #15615] NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking
@ 2010-04-08 7:16 ` Liang Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Liang Li @ 2010-04-08 7:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Amit Shah
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:48PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
The bug still there. I just met it. And seems its quite simple to get it
fixed.
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index a3dff1f..2df1a76 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
*/
static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p)
{
- return unlikely((p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING));
+ return unlikely(p && (p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING));
}
/*
But seems commitid 0017d735092844118bef006696a750a0e4ef6ebd in tip tree
also touched task_is_waking. So the patch for tip tree should be:
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 3acf694..d259641 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
*/
static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p)
{
- return unlikely(p->state == TASK_WAKING);
+ return unlikely(p && p->state == TASK_WAKING);
}
/*
Regards,
-Liang Li
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15615
> Subject : NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking
> Submitter : Amit Shah <shahamit-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-03-23 04:04 (16 days old)
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #15615] NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking
2010-04-08 7:16 ` Liang Li
@ 2010-04-08 7:50 ` Yong Zhang
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Yong Zhang @ 2010-04-08 7:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liang Li
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Amit Shah
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 03:16:17PM +0800, Liang Li wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:48PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
>
> The bug still there. I just met it. And seems its quite simple to get it
> fixed.
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index a3dff1f..2df1a76 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> */
> static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> - return unlikely((p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING));
> + return unlikely(p && (p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING));
> }
Oh, NO. This is wrong. It will introduce other bugs.
The right direction is showed in the bug entry.
Thanks,
Yong
>
> /*
>
> But seems commitid 0017d735092844118bef006696a750a0e4ef6ebd in tip tree
> also touched task_is_waking. So the patch for tip tree should be:
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 3acf694..d259641 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> */
> static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> - return unlikely(p->state == TASK_WAKING);
> + return unlikely(p && p->state == TASK_WAKING);
> }
>
> /*
>
> Regards,
> -Liang Li
>
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15615
> > Subject : NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking
> > Submitter : Amit Shah <shahamit@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-23 04:04 (16 days old)
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #15615] NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking
@ 2010-04-08 7:50 ` Yong Zhang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Yong Zhang @ 2010-04-08 7:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liang Li
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Amit Shah
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 03:16:17PM +0800, Liang Li wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:48PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
>
> The bug still there. I just met it. And seems its quite simple to get it
> fixed.
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index a3dff1f..2df1a76 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> */
> static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> - return unlikely((p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING));
> + return unlikely(p && (p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING));
> }
Oh, NO. This is wrong. It will introduce other bugs.
The right direction is showed in the bug entry.
Thanks,
Yong
>
> /*
>
> But seems commitid 0017d735092844118bef006696a750a0e4ef6ebd in tip tree
> also touched task_is_waking. So the patch for tip tree should be:
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 3acf694..d259641 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> */
> static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> - return unlikely(p->state == TASK_WAKING);
> + return unlikely(p && p->state == TASK_WAKING);
> }
>
> /*
>
> Regards,
> -Liang Li
>
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15615
> > Subject : NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking
> > Submitter : Amit Shah <shahamit-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-23 04:04 (16 days old)
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #15615] NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking
@ 2010-04-08 8:20 ` Liang Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Liang Li @ 2010-04-08 8:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yong Zhang
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Amit Shah
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 03:50:03PM +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 03:16:17PM +0800, Liang Li wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:48PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > > know (either way).
> >
> > The bug still there. I just met it. And seems its quite simple to get it
> > fixed.
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> > index a3dff1f..2df1a76 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> > @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> > */
> > static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p)
> > {
> > - return unlikely((p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING));
> > + return unlikely(p && (p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING));
> > }
Seems what I saw was different from this bug. So it is clear
that this one line change does not relate to this bug. Sorry
for confusion.
>
> Oh, NO. This is wrong. It will introduce other bugs.
> The right direction is showed in the bug entry.
Thanks,
-Liang Li
>
> Thanks,
> Yong
>
> >
> > /*
> >
> > But seems commitid 0017d735092844118bef006696a750a0e4ef6ebd in tip tree
> > also touched task_is_waking. So the patch for tip tree should be:
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> > index 3acf694..d259641 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> > @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> > */
> > static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p)
> > {
> > - return unlikely(p->state == TASK_WAKING);
> > + return unlikely(p && p->state == TASK_WAKING);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> >
> > Regards,
> > -Liang Li
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15615
> > > Subject : NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking
> > > Submitter : Amit Shah <shahamit@gmail.com>
> > > Date : 2010-03-23 04:04 (16 days old)
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #15615] NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking
@ 2010-04-08 8:20 ` Liang Li
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Liang Li @ 2010-04-08 8:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yong Zhang
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Amit Shah
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 03:50:03PM +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 03:16:17PM +0800, Liang Li wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:48PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > > know (either way).
> >
> > The bug still there. I just met it. And seems its quite simple to get it
> > fixed.
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> > index a3dff1f..2df1a76 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> > @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> > */
> > static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p)
> > {
> > - return unlikely((p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING));
> > + return unlikely(p && (p->state == TASK_WAKING) && !(p->flags & PF_STARTING));
> > }
Seems what I saw was different from this bug. So it is clear
that this one line change does not relate to this bug. Sorry
for confusion.
>
> Oh, NO. This is wrong. It will introduce other bugs.
> The right direction is showed in the bug entry.
Thanks,
-Liang Li
>
> Thanks,
> Yong
>
> >
> > /*
> >
> > But seems commitid 0017d735092844118bef006696a750a0e4ef6ebd in tip tree
> > also touched task_is_waking. So the patch for tip tree should be:
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> > index 3acf694..d259641 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> > @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> > */
> > static inline int task_is_waking(struct task_struct *p)
> > {
> > - return unlikely(p->state == TASK_WAKING);
> > + return unlikely(p && p->state == TASK_WAKING);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> >
> > Regards,
> > -Liang Li
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15615
> > > Subject : NULL pointer deref in task_is_waking
> > > Submitter : Amit Shah <shahamit-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > > Date : 2010-03-23 04:04 (16 days old)
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15611] Failure with the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Rupjyoti Sarmah
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15611
Subject : Failure with the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel
Submitter : Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@amcc.com>
Date : 2010-03-16 15:45 (23 days old)
Message-ID : <AC311A8E81420D4EBC1F26E6479848FE065B7D3D@SDCEXCHANGE01.ad.amcc.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126875435718396&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15610] fsck leads to swapper - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference & panic
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Ozgur Yuksel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15610
Subject : fsck leads to swapper - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference & panic
Submitter : Ozgur Yuksel <ozgur.yuksel@oracle.com>
Date : 2010-03-22 15:59 (17 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* [Bug #15619] Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-08 7:32 ` Fabio Comolli
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Fabio Comolli
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15619
Subject : Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected
Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-17 21:58 (22 days old)
Message-ID : <b637ec0b1003171458t524d168fiab52ce2b3431e3c9@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126886311908558&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #15619] Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected
2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15619] Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-08 7:32 ` Fabio Comolli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Comolli @ 2010-04-08 7:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
disappeared between -rc2 and -rc3
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15619
> Subject : Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected
> Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-03-17 21:58 (22 days old)
> Message-ID : <b637ec0b1003171458t524d168fiab52ce2b3431e3c9@mail.gmail.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126886311908558&w=2
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15619] Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected
@ 2010-04-08 7:32 ` Fabio Comolli
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Comolli @ 2010-04-08 7:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
disappeared between -rc2 and -rc3
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15619
> Subject : Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected
> Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-03-17 21:58 (22 days old)
> Message-ID : <b637ec0b1003171458t524d168fiab52ce2b3431e3c9-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126886311908558&w=2
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15619] Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected
@ 2010-04-08 20:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fabio Comolli
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Thursday 08 April 2010, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> disappeared between -rc2 and -rc3
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15619
> > Subject : Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected
> > Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-17 21:58 (22 days old)
> > Message-ID : <b637ec0b1003171458t524d168fiab52ce2b3431e3c9@mail.gmail.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126886311908558&w=2
> >
> >
> >
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15619] Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected
@ 2010-04-08 20:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fabio Comolli
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Thursday 08 April 2010, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> disappeared between -rc2 and -rc3
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15619
> > Subject : Regression - Linux 2.6.34-rc1 - i915 - Render error detected
> > Submitter : Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-17 21:58 (22 days old)
> > Message-ID : <b637ec0b1003171458t524d168fiab52ce2b3431e3c9-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126886311908558&w=2
> >
> >
> >
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15625] BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-12 3:00 ` Randy Dunlap
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Randy Dunlap
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Subject : BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date : 2010-03-18 22:22 (21 days old)
Message-ID : <4BA2A7A9.4080503@oracle.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126895098217351&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #15625] BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15625] BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null) Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-12 3:00 ` Randy Dunlap
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2010-04-12 3:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On 04/07/10 14:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
This was a one-time occurrence. I don't know your policy of whether it should still
be listed or not.
I don't tend to ignore one-time bugs.
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
> Subject : BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
> Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> Date : 2010-03-18 22:22 (21 days old)
> Message-ID : <4BA2A7A9.4080503@oracle.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126895098217351&w=2
--
~Randy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15625] BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
@ 2010-04-12 3:00 ` Randy Dunlap
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2010-04-12 3:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On 04/07/10 14:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
This was a one-time occurrence. I don't know your policy of whether it should still
be listed or not.
I don't tend to ignore one-time bugs.
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
> Subject : BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
> Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-03-18 22:22 (21 days old)
> Message-ID : <4BA2A7A9.4080503-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126895098217351&w=2
--
~Randy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15625] BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
@ 2010-04-12 23:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-12 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Randy Dunlap
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Monday 12 April 2010, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 04/07/10 14:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
>
> This was a one-time occurrence. I don't know your policy of whether it should still
> be listed or not.
>
> I don't tend to ignore one-time bugs.
Let's keep it listed for some time.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15625] BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
@ 2010-04-12 23:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-12 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Randy Dunlap
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Monday 12 April 2010, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 04/07/10 14:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
>
> This was a one-time occurrence. I don't know your policy of whether it should still
> be listed or not.
>
> I don't tend to ignore one-time bugs.
Let's keep it listed for some time.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15624] [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-07 21:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Frederic Weisbecker
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15624
Subject : [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation
Submitter : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-18 4:49 (21 days old)
Message-ID : <20100318044930.GC5045@nowhere>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126888780031992&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #15624] [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation
2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15624] [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 21:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2010-04-07 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15624
> Subject : [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation
> Submitter : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-03-18 4:49 (21 days old)
> Message-ID : <20100318044930.GC5045@nowhere>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126888780031992&w=2
This has been fixed with "eb1e79611cc9bfe21978230e3521e77ea2d7874a"
(perf: Correctly align perf event tracing buffer).
The ticket can be closed, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15624] [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation
@ 2010-04-07 21:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2010-04-07 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15624
> Subject : [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation
> Submitter : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-03-18 4:49 (21 days old)
> Message-ID : <20100318044930.GC5045@nowhere>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126888780031992&w=2
This has been fixed with "eb1e79611cc9bfe21978230e3521e77ea2d7874a"
(perf: Correctly align perf event tracing buffer).
The ticket can be closed, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15624] [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation
2010-04-07 21:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
@ 2010-04-08 20:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Wednesday 07 April 2010, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15624
> > Subject : [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation
> > Submitter : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-18 4:49 (21 days old)
> > Message-ID : <20100318044930.GC5045@nowhere>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126888780031992&w=2
>
>
> This has been fixed with "eb1e79611cc9bfe21978230e3521e77ea2d7874a"
> (perf: Correctly align perf event tracing buffer).
>
> The ticket can be closed, thanks!
Thanks, closing.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15624] [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation
@ 2010-04-08 20:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Wednesday 07 April 2010, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15624
> > Subject : [BUG] percpu misaligned allocation
> > Submitter : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-18 4:49 (21 days old)
> > Message-ID : <20100318044930.GC5045@nowhere>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126888780031992&w=2
>
>
> This has been fixed with "eb1e79611cc9bfe21978230e3521e77ea2d7874a"
> (perf: Correctly align perf event tracing buffer).
>
> The ticket can be closed, thanks!
Thanks, closing.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15664] Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Villacis Lasso
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15664
Subject : Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled
Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec>
Date : 2010-04-01 01:09 (7 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* [Bug #15659] [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Maciej Rutecki
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15659
Subject : [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung
Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-25 20:04 (14 days old)
Message-ID : <201003252104.24965.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954749618319&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15659] [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Maciej Rutecki
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15659
Subject : [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung
Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-03-25 20:04 (14 days old)
Message-ID : <201003252104.24965.maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954749618319&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15655] corrupt ext3 fs and partial freeze
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alban Browaeys
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15655
Subject : corrupt ext3 fs and partial freeze
Submitter : Alban Browaeys <prahal@yahoo.com>
Date : 2010-03-30 08:25 (9 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* [Bug #15661] PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-08 2:29 ` Yong Zhang
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Jon Masters
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15661
Subject : PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64
Submitter : Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>
Date : 2010-03-26 15:29 (13 days old)
Message-ID : <1269617372.3779.234.camel@localhost>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126961739803949&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #15661] PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64
2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15661] PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-08 2:29 ` Yong Zhang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Yong Zhang @ 2010-04-08 2:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Jon Masters
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:50PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15661
> Subject : PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64
> Submitter : Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>
> Date : 2010-03-26 15:29 (13 days old)
> Message-ID : <1269617372.3779.234.camel@localhost>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126961739803949&w=2
>
Seems a duplicate of http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/20/142
and it's reslovled by commit a90110c61073eab95d1986322693c2b9a8a6a5f6
Thanks,
Yong
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15661] PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64
@ 2010-04-08 2:29 ` Yong Zhang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Yong Zhang @ 2010-04-08 2:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Jon Masters
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:50PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15661
> Subject : PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64
> Submitter : Jon Masters <jonathan-Zp4isUonpHBD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-03-26 15:29 (13 days old)
> Message-ID : <1269617372.3779.234.camel@localhost>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126961739803949&w=2
>
Seems a duplicate of http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/20/142
and it's reslovled by commit a90110c61073eab95d1986322693c2b9a8a6a5f6
Thanks,
Yong
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15661] PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64
@ 2010-04-08 20:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yong Zhang
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Jon Masters
On Thursday 08 April 2010, Yong Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:50PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15661
> > Subject : PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64
> > Submitter : Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-26 15:29 (13 days old)
> > Message-ID : <1269617372.3779.234.camel@localhost>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126961739803949&w=2
> >
>
> Seems a duplicate of http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/20/142
> and it's reslovled by commit a90110c61073eab95d1986322693c2b9a8a6a5f6
Thanks, closing.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15661] PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64
@ 2010-04-08 20:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yong Zhang
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Jon Masters
On Thursday 08 April 2010, Yong Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:13:50PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15661
> > Subject : PROBLEM: crash on halt with 2.6.34-0.16.rc2.git0.fc14.x86_64
> > Submitter : Jon Masters <jonathan-Zp4isUonpHBD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-26 15:29 (13 days old)
> > Message-ID : <1269617372.3779.234.camel@localhost>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126961739803949&w=2
> >
>
> Seems a duplicate of http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/20/142
> and it's reslovled by commit a90110c61073eab95d1986322693c2b9a8a6a5f6
Thanks, closing.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15673] 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"?
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Thomas Meyer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673
Subject : 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"?
Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Date : 2010-03-28 11:31 (11 days old)
Message-ID : <1269775909.5301.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126977593326800&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* [Bug #15669] INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check()
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Zdenek Kabelac
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15669
Subject : INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check()
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-08 1:26 (31 days old)
Message-ID : <c4e36d111003250348q678eb2e6w4f3e8133e7fd6e58@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126801163107713&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* [Bug #15671] intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung)
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Norbert Preining
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15671
Subject : intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung)
Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Date : 2010-03-27 16:11 (12 days old)
Message-ID : <20100327161104.GA12043@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970883105262&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* [Bug #15668] start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, H. Peter Anvin,
Rabin Vincent, Yinghai Lu
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15668
Subject : start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early
Submitter : Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
Date : 2010-03-25 19:53 (14 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/773e3eb7b81e5ba13b5155dfb3bb75b8ce37f8f9
Message-ID : <20100325194100.GA2364@debian>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954607216519&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15668] start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, H. Peter Anvin,
Rabin Vincent, Yinghai Lu
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15668
Subject : start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early
Submitter : Rabin Vincent <rabin-66gdRtMMWGc@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-03-25 19:53 (14 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/773e3eb7b81e5ba13b5155dfb3bb75b8ce37f8f9
Message-ID : <20100325194100.GA2364@debian>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954607216519&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15668] start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early
2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 22:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2010-04-07 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Rabin Vincent, Yinghai Lu
On 04/07/2010 02:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15668
> Subject : start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early
> Submitter : Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
> Date : 2010-03-25 19:53 (14 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/773e3eb7b81e5ba13b5155dfb3bb75b8ce37f8f9
^^^^
FWIW, this /git is redundant.
-hpa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #15668] start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early
@ 2010-04-07 22:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2010-04-07 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Rabin Vincent, Yinghai Lu
On 04/07/2010 02:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15668
> Subject : start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early
> Submitter : Rabin Vincent <rabin-66gdRtMMWGc@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-03-25 19:53 (14 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/773e3eb7b81e5ba13b5155dfb3bb75b8ce37f8f9
^^^^
FWIW, this /git is redundant.
-hpa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #15668] start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early
@ 2010-04-08 20:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H. Peter Anvin
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Rabin Vincent, Yinghai Lu
On Thursday 08 April 2010, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 04/07/2010 02:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15668
> > Subject : start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early
> > Submitter : Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
> > Date : 2010-03-25 19:53 (14 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/773e3eb7b81e5ba13b5155dfb3bb75b8ce37f8f9
> ^^^^
>
> FWIW, this /git is redundant.
Ah, thanks for the hint. :-)
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15668] start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early
@ 2010-04-08 20:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H. Peter Anvin
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Rabin Vincent, Yinghai Lu
On Thursday 08 April 2010, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 04/07/2010 02:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15668
> > Subject : start_kernel(): bug: interrupts were enabled early
> > Submitter : Rabin Vincent <rabin-66gdRtMMWGc@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-25 19:53 (14 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/773e3eb7b81e5ba13b5155dfb3bb75b8ce37f8f9
> ^^^^
>
> FWIW, this /git is redundant.
Ah, thanks for the hint. :-)
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15672] KVM bug, git bisected
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Kent Overstreet, Rik van Riel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15672
Subject : KVM bug, git bisected
Submitter : Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-27 12:43 (12 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/5beb49305251e5669852ed541e8e2f2f7696c53e
Message-ID : <4BADFD74.8060904@gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126969385121711&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15711] 2.6.34-rc3, BUG at mm/slab.c:2989
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Heinz Diehl
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15711
Subject : 2.6.34-rc3, BUG at mm/slab.c:2989
Submitter : Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
Date : 2010-04-01 17:52 (7 days old)
Message-ID : <20100401175225.GA6581@fancy-poultry.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127014437406250&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (27 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-14 10:12 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Sergey Senozhatsky
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704
Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (8 days old)
Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-14 10:12 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2010-04-14 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3509 bytes --]
Hello,
Sorry for the delay, I've been away.
On (04/07/10 23:13), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704
> Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
> Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (8 days old)
> Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2
>
>
Yes, bug is still here (though I'm not sure whether it's correct to test with frame size 2048).
Here it is:
kernel: [ 2292.172886] pktgen 2.72: Packet Generator for packet performance testing.
kernel: [ 2339.999788] ------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel: [ 2339.999800] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:256 dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125()
kernel: [ 2339.999803] Hardware name: F3JC
kernel: [ 2339.999806] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out
kernel: [ 2339.999809] Modules linked in: pktgen ipv6 snd_hwdep snd_hda_codec_si3054 snd_hda_codec_realtek sdhci_pci sdhci asus_laptop sparse_keymap snd_hda_intel mmc_core
led_class snd_hda_codec psmouse snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc i2c_i801 serio_raw sg evdev rng_core r8169 mii usbhid hid uhci_hcd ehci_hcd sr_mod cdrom sd_mod
usbcore ata_piix
kernel: [ 2339.999857] Pid: 3720, comm: kpktgend_0 Not tainted 2.6.34-rc3-dbg-r8169-git6 #81
kernel: [ 2339.999861] Call Trace:
kernel: [ 2339.999868] [<c102e7f7>] warn_slowpath_common+0x65/0x7c
kernel: [ 2339.999874] [<c126e4f8>] ? dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125
kernel: [ 2339.999879] [<c102e842>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x24/0x27
kernel: [ 2339.999884] [<c126e4f8>] dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125
kernel: [ 2339.999891] [<c1040039>] ? abort_exclusive_wait+0x26/0x63
kernel: [ 2339.999897] [<c103712b>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x120/0x1eb
kernel: [ 2339.999902] [<c1037181>] run_timer_softirq+0x176/0x1eb
kernel: [ 2339.999907] [<c103712b>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x120/0x1eb
kernel: [ 2339.999913] [<c126e437>] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x125
kernel: [ 2339.999919] [<c10332a1>] __do_softirq+0x8d/0x117
kernel: [ 2339.999925] [<c1033356>] do_softirq+0x2b/0x43
kernel: [ 2339.999929] [<c103347b>] irq_exit+0x38/0x75
kernel: [ 2339.999936] [<c1015200>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x7b
kernel: [ 2339.999943] [<c12cbcda>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x36/0x3c
kernel: [ 2339.999948] [<c104007b>] ? finish_wait+0x5/0x49
kernel: [ 2339.999953] [<c10400d8>] ? prepare_to_wait_exclusive+0x19/0x5b
kernel: [ 2339.999959] [<c105106d>] ? lock_release+0x19a/0x1a1
kernel: [ 2339.999965] [<c12cb259>] _raw_spin_unlock+0x16/0x3f
kernel: [ 2339.999972] [<f80ea460>] pktgen_thread_worker+0xe0/0x631 [pktgen]
kernel: [ 2339.999978] [<c103ffad>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f
kernel: [ 2339.999983] [<c103ffad>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f
kernel: [ 2339.999989] [<f80ea380>] ? pktgen_thread_worker+0x0/0x631 [pktgen]
kernel: [ 2339.999994] [<c103fc8a>] kthread+0x6a/0x6f
kernel: [ 2339.999999] [<c103fc20>] ? kthread+0x0/0x6f
kernel: [ 2340.000005] [<c1002e82>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x1a
kernel: [ 2340.000008] ---[ end trace 25113681b662d02f ]---
Sergey
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
@ 2010-04-14 10:12 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2010-04-14 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3564 bytes --]
Hello,
Sorry for the delay, I've been away.
On (04/07/10 23:13), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704
> Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
> Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (8 days old)
> Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294-dY8u8AhHFaWtd10JCjopabkcH5ONE+aC@public.gmane.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2
>
>
Yes, bug is still here (though I'm not sure whether it's correct to test with frame size 2048).
Here it is:
kernel: [ 2292.172886] pktgen 2.72: Packet Generator for packet performance testing.
kernel: [ 2339.999788] ------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel: [ 2339.999800] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:256 dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125()
kernel: [ 2339.999803] Hardware name: F3JC
kernel: [ 2339.999806] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out
kernel: [ 2339.999809] Modules linked in: pktgen ipv6 snd_hwdep snd_hda_codec_si3054 snd_hda_codec_realtek sdhci_pci sdhci asus_laptop sparse_keymap snd_hda_intel mmc_core
led_class snd_hda_codec psmouse snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc i2c_i801 serio_raw sg evdev rng_core r8169 mii usbhid hid uhci_hcd ehci_hcd sr_mod cdrom sd_mod
usbcore ata_piix
kernel: [ 2339.999857] Pid: 3720, comm: kpktgend_0 Not tainted 2.6.34-rc3-dbg-r8169-git6 #81
kernel: [ 2339.999861] Call Trace:
kernel: [ 2339.999868] [<c102e7f7>] warn_slowpath_common+0x65/0x7c
kernel: [ 2339.999874] [<c126e4f8>] ? dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125
kernel: [ 2339.999879] [<c102e842>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x24/0x27
kernel: [ 2339.999884] [<c126e4f8>] dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125
kernel: [ 2339.999891] [<c1040039>] ? abort_exclusive_wait+0x26/0x63
kernel: [ 2339.999897] [<c103712b>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x120/0x1eb
kernel: [ 2339.999902] [<c1037181>] run_timer_softirq+0x176/0x1eb
kernel: [ 2339.999907] [<c103712b>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x120/0x1eb
kernel: [ 2339.999913] [<c126e437>] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x125
kernel: [ 2339.999919] [<c10332a1>] __do_softirq+0x8d/0x117
kernel: [ 2339.999925] [<c1033356>] do_softirq+0x2b/0x43
kernel: [ 2339.999929] [<c103347b>] irq_exit+0x38/0x75
kernel: [ 2339.999936] [<c1015200>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x7b
kernel: [ 2339.999943] [<c12cbcda>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x36/0x3c
kernel: [ 2339.999948] [<c104007b>] ? finish_wait+0x5/0x49
kernel: [ 2339.999953] [<c10400d8>] ? prepare_to_wait_exclusive+0x19/0x5b
kernel: [ 2339.999959] [<c105106d>] ? lock_release+0x19a/0x1a1
kernel: [ 2339.999965] [<c12cb259>] _raw_spin_unlock+0x16/0x3f
kernel: [ 2339.999972] [<f80ea460>] pktgen_thread_worker+0xe0/0x631 [pktgen]
kernel: [ 2339.999978] [<c103ffad>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f
kernel: [ 2339.999983] [<c103ffad>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f
kernel: [ 2339.999989] [<f80ea380>] ? pktgen_thread_worker+0x0/0x631 [pktgen]
kernel: [ 2339.999994] [<c103fc8a>] kthread+0x6a/0x6f
kernel: [ 2339.999999] [<c103fc20>] ? kthread+0x0/0x6f
kernel: [ 2340.000005] [<c1002e82>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x1a
kernel: [ 2340.000008] ---[ end trace 25113681b662d02f ]---
Sergey
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
@ 2010-04-15 17:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-15 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergey Senozhatsky
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Wednesday 14 April 2010, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
> Sorry for the delay, I've been away.
>
> On (04/07/10 23:13), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704
> > Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
> > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (8 days old)
> > Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2
> >
> >
>
>
> Yes, bug is still here (though I'm not sure whether it's correct to test with frame size 2048).
>
> Here it is:
>
> kernel: [ 2292.172886] pktgen 2.72: Packet Generator for packet performance testing.
> kernel: [ 2339.999788] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel: [ 2339.999800] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:256 dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125()
> kernel: [ 2339.999803] Hardware name: F3JC
> kernel: [ 2339.999806] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out
> kernel: [ 2339.999809] Modules linked in: pktgen ipv6 snd_hwdep snd_hda_codec_si3054 snd_hda_codec_realtek sdhci_pci sdhci asus_laptop sparse_keymap snd_hda_intel mmc_core
> led_class snd_hda_codec psmouse snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc i2c_i801 serio_raw sg evdev rng_core r8169 mii usbhid hid uhci_hcd ehci_hcd sr_mod cdrom sd_mod
> usbcore ata_piix
> kernel: [ 2339.999857] Pid: 3720, comm: kpktgend_0 Not tainted 2.6.34-rc3-dbg-r8169-git6 #81
> kernel: [ 2339.999861] Call Trace:
> kernel: [ 2339.999868] [<c102e7f7>] warn_slowpath_common+0x65/0x7c
> kernel: [ 2339.999874] [<c126e4f8>] ? dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125
> kernel: [ 2339.999879] [<c102e842>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x24/0x27
> kernel: [ 2339.999884] [<c126e4f8>] dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125
> kernel: [ 2339.999891] [<c1040039>] ? abort_exclusive_wait+0x26/0x63
> kernel: [ 2339.999897] [<c103712b>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x120/0x1eb
> kernel: [ 2339.999902] [<c1037181>] run_timer_softirq+0x176/0x1eb
> kernel: [ 2339.999907] [<c103712b>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x120/0x1eb
> kernel: [ 2339.999913] [<c126e437>] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x125
> kernel: [ 2339.999919] [<c10332a1>] __do_softirq+0x8d/0x117
> kernel: [ 2339.999925] [<c1033356>] do_softirq+0x2b/0x43
> kernel: [ 2339.999929] [<c103347b>] irq_exit+0x38/0x75
> kernel: [ 2339.999936] [<c1015200>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x7b
> kernel: [ 2339.999943] [<c12cbcda>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x36/0x3c
> kernel: [ 2339.999948] [<c104007b>] ? finish_wait+0x5/0x49
> kernel: [ 2339.999953] [<c10400d8>] ? prepare_to_wait_exclusive+0x19/0x5b
> kernel: [ 2339.999959] [<c105106d>] ? lock_release+0x19a/0x1a1
> kernel: [ 2339.999965] [<c12cb259>] _raw_spin_unlock+0x16/0x3f
> kernel: [ 2339.999972] [<f80ea460>] pktgen_thread_worker+0xe0/0x631 [pktgen]
> kernel: [ 2339.999978] [<c103ffad>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f
> kernel: [ 2339.999983] [<c103ffad>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f
> kernel: [ 2339.999989] [<f80ea380>] ? pktgen_thread_worker+0x0/0x631 [pktgen]
> kernel: [ 2339.999994] [<c103fc8a>] kthread+0x6a/0x6f
> kernel: [ 2339.999999] [<c103fc20>] ? kthread+0x0/0x6f
> kernel: [ 2340.000005] [<c1002e82>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x1a
> kernel: [ 2340.000008] ---[ end trace 25113681b662d02f ]---
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
@ 2010-04-15 17:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-15 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergey Senozhatsky
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Wednesday 14 April 2010, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
> Sorry for the delay, I've been away.
>
> On (04/07/10 23:13), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704
> > Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
> > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (8 days old)
> > Message-ID : <20100331102142.GA3294-dY8u8AhHFaWtd10JCjopabkcH5ONE+aC@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2
> >
> >
>
>
> Yes, bug is still here (though I'm not sure whether it's correct to test with frame size 2048).
>
> Here it is:
>
> kernel: [ 2292.172886] pktgen 2.72: Packet Generator for packet performance testing.
> kernel: [ 2339.999788] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel: [ 2339.999800] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:256 dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125()
> kernel: [ 2339.999803] Hardware name: F3JC
> kernel: [ 2339.999806] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out
> kernel: [ 2339.999809] Modules linked in: pktgen ipv6 snd_hwdep snd_hda_codec_si3054 snd_hda_codec_realtek sdhci_pci sdhci asus_laptop sparse_keymap snd_hda_intel mmc_core
> led_class snd_hda_codec psmouse snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc i2c_i801 serio_raw sg evdev rng_core r8169 mii usbhid hid uhci_hcd ehci_hcd sr_mod cdrom sd_mod
> usbcore ata_piix
> kernel: [ 2339.999857] Pid: 3720, comm: kpktgend_0 Not tainted 2.6.34-rc3-dbg-r8169-git6 #81
> kernel: [ 2339.999861] Call Trace:
> kernel: [ 2339.999868] [<c102e7f7>] warn_slowpath_common+0x65/0x7c
> kernel: [ 2339.999874] [<c126e4f8>] ? dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125
> kernel: [ 2339.999879] [<c102e842>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x24/0x27
> kernel: [ 2339.999884] [<c126e4f8>] dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x125
> kernel: [ 2339.999891] [<c1040039>] ? abort_exclusive_wait+0x26/0x63
> kernel: [ 2339.999897] [<c103712b>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x120/0x1eb
> kernel: [ 2339.999902] [<c1037181>] run_timer_softirq+0x176/0x1eb
> kernel: [ 2339.999907] [<c103712b>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x120/0x1eb
> kernel: [ 2339.999913] [<c126e437>] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x125
> kernel: [ 2339.999919] [<c10332a1>] __do_softirq+0x8d/0x117
> kernel: [ 2339.999925] [<c1033356>] do_softirq+0x2b/0x43
> kernel: [ 2339.999929] [<c103347b>] irq_exit+0x38/0x75
> kernel: [ 2339.999936] [<c1015200>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6d/0x7b
> kernel: [ 2339.999943] [<c12cbcda>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x36/0x3c
> kernel: [ 2339.999948] [<c104007b>] ? finish_wait+0x5/0x49
> kernel: [ 2339.999953] [<c10400d8>] ? prepare_to_wait_exclusive+0x19/0x5b
> kernel: [ 2339.999959] [<c105106d>] ? lock_release+0x19a/0x1a1
> kernel: [ 2339.999965] [<c12cb259>] _raw_spin_unlock+0x16/0x3f
> kernel: [ 2339.999972] [<f80ea460>] pktgen_thread_worker+0xe0/0x631 [pktgen]
> kernel: [ 2339.999978] [<c103ffad>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f
> kernel: [ 2339.999983] [<c103ffad>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f
> kernel: [ 2339.999989] [<f80ea380>] ? pktgen_thread_worker+0x0/0x631 [pktgen]
> kernel: [ 2339.999994] [<c103fc8a>] kthread+0x6a/0x6f
> kernel: [ 2339.999999] [<c103fc20>] ? kthread+0x0/0x6f
> kernel: [ 2340.000005] [<c1002e82>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x1a
> kernel: [ 2340.000008] ---[ end trace 25113681b662d02f ]---
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15712] [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (28 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Pavel Machek
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712
Subject : [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-04-01 6:06 (7 days old)
Message-ID : <20100401060624.GA1329@ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127010200817402&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* [Bug #15674] [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure...
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (29 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Daniel J Blueman
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674
Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure...
Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old)
Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* [Bug #15718] File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (30 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-08 11:56 ` Boaz Harrosh
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Al Viro, Boaz Harrosh
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718
Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774
Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5
Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802@panasas.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4
Handled-By : Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #15718] File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774
2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15718] File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-08 11:56 ` Boaz Harrosh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Boaz Harrosh @ 2010-04-08 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Al Viro
On 04/08/2010 12:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718
> Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774
> Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
> Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5
> Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802@panasas.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4
> Handled-By : Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
>
>
Fix already in main line: 3e297b613491f0d4928aa652a2cd266aa06dc409
Author: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Restore LOOKUP_DIRECTORY hint handling in final lookup on open()
Boaz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15718] File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774
@ 2010-04-08 11:56 ` Boaz Harrosh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Boaz Harrosh @ 2010-04-08 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Al Viro
On 04/08/2010 12:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718
> Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774
> Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh-C4P08NqkoRlBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5
> Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802-C4P08NqkoRlBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4
> Handled-By : Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
>
>
Fix already in main line: 3e297b613491f0d4928aa652a2cd266aa06dc409
Author: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
Restore LOOKUP_DIRECTORY hint handling in final lookup on open()
Boaz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15718] File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774
@ 2010-04-08 20:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Boaz Harrosh
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Al Viro
On Thursday 08 April 2010, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 04/08/2010 12:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718
> > Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774
> > Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5
> > Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802@panasas.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4
> > Handled-By : Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> >
> >
>
> Fix already in main line: 3e297b613491f0d4928aa652a2cd266aa06dc409
> Author: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> Restore LOOKUP_DIRECTORY hint handling in final lookup on open()
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15718] File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774
@ 2010-04-08 20:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Boaz Harrosh
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Al Viro
On Thursday 08 April 2010, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 04/08/2010 12:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718
> > Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774
> > Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh-C4P08NqkoRlBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5
> > Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802-C4P08NqkoRlBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4
> > Handled-By : Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
> >
> >
>
> Fix already in main line: 3e297b613491f0d4928aa652a2cd266aa06dc409
> Author: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
> Restore LOOKUP_DIRECTORY hint handling in final lookup on open()
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15716] ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Benton, Jeff Garzik
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716
Subject : ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1
Submitter : Andrew Benton <b3nton@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-11 16:57 (28 days old)
Message-ID : <4B992110.2090300@gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126832670609705&w=4
Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15716] ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Benton, Jeff Garzik
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716
Subject : ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1
Submitter : Andrew Benton <b3nton-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-03-11 16:57 (28 days old)
Message-ID : <4B992110.2090300-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126832670609705&w=4
Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jeff-o2qLIJkoznsdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15717] bluetooth oops
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Marcel Holtmann, Pavel Machek
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717
Subject : bluetooth oops
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (25 days old)
Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059@elf.ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4
Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Shi, Christoph Lameter,
Pekka Enberg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713
Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (14 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864
Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4
Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15715] vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (34 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-07 22:05 ` Linus Torvalds
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton,
KOSAKI Motohiro, Linus Torvalds, Shaohua Li, Wu Fengguang
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715
Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio
Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26
Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4
Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* Re: [Bug #15715] vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio
2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15715] vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 22:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-08 20:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 124+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-04-07 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, Shaohua Li, Wu Fengguang
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715
> Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio
> Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
> Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26
> Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4
> Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Reverted by commit d6da1a5abc2bf3a06a5bda08e0f6833409234666
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15715] vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio
@ 2010-04-08 20:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, Shaohua Li, Wu Fengguang
On Thursday 08 April 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715
> > Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio
> > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26
> > Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4
> > Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
>
> Reverted by commit d6da1a5abc2bf3a06a5bda08e0f6833409234666
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15715] vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio
@ 2010-04-08 20:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Andrew Morton, KOSAKI Motohiro, Shaohua Li, Wu Fengguang
On Thursday 08 April 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715
> > Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio
> > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26
> > Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983-U5EdaLXB8smDugQYiPIPGdh3ngVCH38I@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4
> > Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
> > Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>
> Reverted by commit d6da1a5abc2bf3a06a5bda08e0f6833409234666
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15719] virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, David S. Miller,
Rusty Russell, Shirley Ma, Shirley Ma, Thomas Müller
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15719
Subject : virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox
Submitter : Thomas Müller <thomas@mathtm.de>
Date : 2010-03-27 14:32 (12 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9ab86bbcf8be755256f0a5e994e0b38af6b4d399
Message-ID : <4BAE1707.2050803@mathtm.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970039227740&w=4
Handled-By : Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15719] virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, David S. Miller,
Rusty Russell, Shirley Ma, Shirley Ma, Thomas Müller
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15719
Subject : virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox
Submitter : Thomas Müller <thomas-5bHTHlrcoh6zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-03-27 14:32 (12 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9ab86bbcf8be755256f0a5e994e0b38af6b4d399
Message-ID : <4BAE1707.2050803-5bHTHlrcoh6zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970039227740&w=4
Handled-By : Shirley Ma <mashirle-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15719] virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox
2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-12 8:39 ` Thomas Müller
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Müller @ 2010-04-12 8:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
David S. Miller, Rusty Russell, Shirley Ma, Shirley Ma
Hi,
a fix (commit 2c45cd43ff791cc4ab6a6332165ad53d7bcb3673) is included in
linux-next and net-next, but not (yet?) in linux-2.6.
Regards,
Thomas
On 07.04.2010 23:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15719
> Subject : virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox
> Submitter : Thomas Müller <thomas@mathtm.de>
> Date : 2010-03-27 14:32 (12 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9ab86bbcf8be755256f0a5e994e0b38af6b4d399
> Message-ID : <4BAE1707.2050803@mathtm.de>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970039227740&w=4
> Handled-By : Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15719] virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox
@ 2010-04-12 8:39 ` Thomas Müller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Müller @ 2010-04-12 8:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
David S. Miller, Rusty Russell, Shirley Ma, Shirley Ma
Hi,
a fix (commit 2c45cd43ff791cc4ab6a6332165ad53d7bcb3673) is included in
linux-next and net-next, but not (yet?) in linux-2.6.
Regards,
Thomas
On 07.04.2010 23:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15719
> Subject : virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox
> Submitter : Thomas Müller <thomas@mathtm.de>
> Date : 2010-03-27 14:32 (12 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9ab86bbcf8be755256f0a5e994e0b38af6b4d399
> Message-ID : <4BAE1707.2050803@mathtm.de>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970039227740&w=4
> Handled-By : Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15719] virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox
@ 2010-04-12 9:28 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2010-04-12 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: thomas
Cc: rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, maciej.rutecki, rusty, mashirle, xma
From: Thomas Müller <thomas@mathtm.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:39:54 +0200
> Hi,
>
> a fix (commit 2c45cd43ff791cc4ab6a6332165ad53d7bcb3673) is included in
> linux-next and net-next, but not (yet?) in linux-2.6.
This bug was only present in -next and net-next-2.6 to the best of
my knowledge, so the fix only showing up there is appropriate.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15719] virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox
@ 2010-04-12 9:28 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2010-04-12 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: thomas-5bHTHlrcoh6zQB+pC5nmwQ
Cc: rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww, mashirle-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA,
xma-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA
From: Thomas Müller <thomas-5bHTHlrcoh6zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:39:54 +0200
> Hi,
>
> a fix (commit 2c45cd43ff791cc4ab6a6332165ad53d7bcb3673) is included in
> linux-next and net-next, but not (yet?) in linux-2.6.
This bug was only present in -next and net-next-2.6 to the best of
my knowledge, so the fix only showing up there is appropriate.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15719] virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox
@ 2010-04-12 9:50 ` Thomas Müller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Müller @ 2010-04-12 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, maciej.rutecki, rusty, mashirle, xma
Hi,
On 12.04.2010 11:28, David Miller wrote:
>> a fix (commit 2c45cd43ff791cc4ab6a6332165ad53d7bcb3673) is included in
>> linux-next and net-next, but not (yet?) in linux-2.6.
>
> This bug was only present in -next and net-next-2.6 to the best of
> my knowledge, so the fix only showing up there is appropriate.
I think I have to disagree.
I hit this bug with a clean checkout of linux-2.6 and I also bisected
against the linux-2.6 repo.
(I did however use a Fedora rawhide kernel config as starting point,
so presumably there were a lot of debug options activated)
When Shirley Ma sent the fix, I did verify that linux-2.6 without
the fix did not work, and that everything worked fine with it applied.
Regards,
Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15719] virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox
@ 2010-04-12 9:50 ` Thomas Müller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Müller @ 2010-04-12 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww, mashirle-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA,
xma-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA
Hi,
On 12.04.2010 11:28, David Miller wrote:
>> a fix (commit 2c45cd43ff791cc4ab6a6332165ad53d7bcb3673) is included in
>> linux-next and net-next, but not (yet?) in linux-2.6.
>
> This bug was only present in -next and net-next-2.6 to the best of
> my knowledge, so the fix only showing up there is appropriate.
I think I have to disagree.
I hit this bug with a clean checkout of linux-2.6 and I also bisected
against the linux-2.6 repo.
(I did however use a Fedora rawhide kernel config as starting point,
so presumably there were a lot of debug options activated)
When Shirley Ma sent the fix, I did verify that linux-2.6 without
the fix did not work, and that everything worked fine with it applied.
Regards,
Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15719] virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox
@ 2010-04-13 5:01 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2010-04-13 5:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: thomas
Cc: rjw, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, maciej.rutecki, rusty, mashirle, xma
From: Thomas Müller <thomas@mathtm.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:50:28 +0200
> I think I have to disagree.
Indeed you're right, net-2.6 needs it too.
Thanks for catching this, I've cherry picked the commit
from net-next-2.6 and added it to net-2.6
Thanks again!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15719] virtio_net causing kernel BUG when running under VirtualBox
@ 2010-04-13 5:01 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2010-04-13 5:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: thomas-5bHTHlrcoh6zQB+pC5nmwQ
Cc: rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
maciej.rutecki-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w,
rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww, mashirle-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA,
xma-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA
From: Thomas Müller <thomas-5bHTHlrcoh6zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:50:28 +0200
> I think I have to disagree.
Indeed you're right, net-2.6 needs it too.
Thanks for catching this, I've cherry picked the commit
from net-next-2.6 and added it to net-2.6
Thanks again!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (36 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 21:53 ` John W. Linville
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: John W. Linville @ 2010-04-07 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Kernel Testers List, Network Development,
Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List,
DRI
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:08:30PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15551
> Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/work.c:811 ieee80211_work_work+0x7f/0xde8 [mac80211]()
> Submitter : Alex Zhavnerchik <alex.vizor@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-03-16 22:03 (23 days old)
I sent a pull request with the patch for this to Dave M. today. :-)
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (37 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 21:53 ` John W. Linville
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: John W. Linville @ 2010-04-07 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton,
Kernel Testers List, Linus Torvalds, Linux PM List,
Maciej Rutecki
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 11:08:30PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15551
> Subject : WARNING: at net/mac80211/work.c:811 ieee80211_work_work+0x7f/0xde8 [mac80211]()
> Submitter : Alex Zhavnerchik <alex.vizor@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-03-16 22:03 (23 days old)
I sent a pull request with the patch for this to Dave M. today. :-)
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (38 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-04-07 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux ACPI, Al Viro, Andrew Morton,
Kernel Testers List, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718
> Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774
> Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
> Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5
> Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802@panasas.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4
> Handled-By : Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
I think this one is fixed by commit 3e297b61349.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716
> Subject : ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1
> Submitter : Andrew Benton <b3nton@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-03-11 16:57 (28 days old)
> Message-ID : <4B992110.2090300@gmail.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126832670609705&w=4
> Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
And isn't this the already long-fixed commit 332ac7ff77cd?
That bugzilla entry is a duplicate of
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15537
as far as I can see.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715
> Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio
> Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
> Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26
> Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4
> Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
That commit got reverted. See commit d6da1a5abc.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674
> Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure...
> Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old)
> Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082@mail.gmail.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2
This smells like the same LOOKUP_DIRECTORY thing as the first entry, but..
Al?
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15600
> Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1
> Submitter : Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
> Date : 2010-03-15 15:28 (24 days old)
> Message-ID : <4B9E5211.9000204@redhat.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866691701926&w=2
These should hopefully be all fixed. There was some confusion over this,
but the report that said it wasn't fixed in -rc3 was apparently not true
after all. Several commits, but mainly commit eed63519e, iirc.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518
> Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit
> Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> Date : 2010-03-11 15:37 (28 days old)
Duplicate entry. See above.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480
> Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs
> Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com>
> Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old)
> Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512
These are merged already. Commits d558b483d5, eb9fc8ef7cb etc.
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
2010-04-07 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (39 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-07 22:19 ` Al Viro
` (3 more replies)
-1 siblings, 4 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-04-07 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI,
Al Viro
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718
> Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774
> Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
> Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5
> Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802@panasas.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4
> Handled-By : Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
I think this one is fixed by commit 3e297b61349.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716
> Subject : ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1
> Submitter : Andrew Benton <b3nton@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-03-11 16:57 (28 days old)
> Message-ID : <4B992110.2090300@gmail.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126832670609705&w=4
> Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
And isn't this the already long-fixed commit 332ac7ff77cd?
That bugzilla entry is a duplicate of
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15537
as far as I can see.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715
> Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio
> Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
> Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26
> Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4
> Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
That commit got reverted. See commit d6da1a5abc.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674
> Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure...
> Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old)
> Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082@mail.gmail.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2
This smells like the same LOOKUP_DIRECTORY thing as the first entry, but..
Al?
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15600
> Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1
> Submitter : Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
> Date : 2010-03-15 15:28 (24 days old)
> Message-ID : <4B9E5211.9000204@redhat.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866691701926&w=2
These should hopefully be all fixed. There was some confusion over this,
but the report that said it wasn't fixed in -rc3 was apparently not true
after all. Several commits, but mainly commit eed63519e, iirc.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518
> Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit
> Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> Date : 2010-03-11 15:37 (28 days old)
Duplicate entry. See above.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480
> Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs
> Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com>
> Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old)
> Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512
These are merged already. Commits d558b483d5, eb9fc8ef7cb etc.
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
@ 2010-04-07 22:19 ` Al Viro
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Al Viro @ 2010-04-07 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki,
Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development,
Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List,
DRI
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 03:04:46PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674
> > Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure...
> > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old)
> > Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082@mail.gmail.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2
>
> This smells like the same LOOKUP_DIRECTORY thing as the first entry, but..
No, it's not the same thing; the fix is to have nfs ->d_revalidate()
return an error on failing open attempt (in insane codepath that has
->d_revalidate() handling open()). Confirmed to work by reporter...
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index d79a7b3..fe0cd9e 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -2068,8 +2068,7 @@ nfs4_open_revalidate(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, int openflags, st
case -EDQUOT:
case -ENOSPC:
case -EROFS:
- lookup_instantiate_filp(nd, (struct dentry *)state, NULL);
- return 1;
+ return PTR_ERR(state);
default:
goto out_drop;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
@ 2010-04-07 22:19 ` Al Viro
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Al Viro @ 2010-04-07 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki,
Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development,
Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List,
DRI
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 03:04:46PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674
> > Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure...
> > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old)
> > Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2
>
> This smells like the same LOOKUP_DIRECTORY thing as the first entry, but..
No, it's not the same thing; the fix is to have nfs ->d_revalidate()
return an error on failing open attempt (in insane codepath that has
->d_revalidate() handling open()). Confirmed to work by reporter...
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index d79a7b3..fe0cd9e 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -2068,8 +2068,7 @@ nfs4_open_revalidate(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, int openflags, st
case -EDQUOT:
case -ENOSPC:
case -EROFS:
- lookup_instantiate_filp(nd, (struct dentry *)state, NULL);
- return 1;
+ return PTR_ERR(state);
default:
goto out_drop;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
2010-04-07 22:19 ` Al Viro
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 22:22 ` Linus Torvalds
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-04-07 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Al Viro
Cc: DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton,
Kernel Testers List, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Al Viro wrote:
>
> No, it's not the same thing; the fix is to have nfs ->d_revalidate()
> return an error on failing open attempt (in insane codepath that has
> ->d_revalidate() handling open()). Confirmed to work by reporter...
Ok, can you do the proper changelog description and sign-offs etc?
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
@ 2010-04-07 22:22 ` Linus Torvalds
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-04-07 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Al Viro
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki,
Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development,
Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List,
DRI
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Al Viro wrote:
>
> No, it's not the same thing; the fix is to have nfs ->d_revalidate()
> return an error on failing open attempt (in insane codepath that has
> ->d_revalidate() handling open()). Confirmed to work by reporter...
Ok, can you do the proper changelog description and sign-offs etc?
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
@ 2010-04-07 22:22 ` Linus Torvalds
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-04-07 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Al Viro
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki,
Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development,
Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List,
DRI
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Al Viro wrote:
>
> No, it's not the same thing; the fix is to have nfs ->d_revalidate()
> return an error on failing open attempt (in insane codepath that has
> ->d_revalidate() handling open()). Confirmed to work by reporter...
Ok, can you do the proper changelog description and sign-offs etc?
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
@ 2010-04-07 23:06 ` Al Viro
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Al Viro @ 2010-04-07 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki,
Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development,
Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List,
DRI
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 03:22:20PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Al Viro wrote:
> >
> > No, it's not the same thing; the fix is to have nfs ->d_revalidate()
> > return an error on failing open attempt (in insane codepath that has
> > ->d_revalidate() handling open()). Confirmed to work by reporter...
>
> Ok, can you do the proper changelog description and sign-offs etc?
[PATCH] Have nfs ->d_revalidate() report errors properly
If nfs atomic open implementation ends up doing open request from
->d_revalidate() codepath and gets an error from server, return that error
to caller explicitly and don't bother with lookup_instantiate_filp() at all.
->d_revalidate() can return an error itself just fine...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index d79a7b3..fe0cd9e 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -2068,8 +2068,7 @@ nfs4_open_revalidate(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, int openflags, st
case -EDQUOT:
case -ENOSPC:
case -EROFS:
- lookup_instantiate_filp(nd, (struct dentry *)state, NULL);
- return 1;
+ return PTR_ERR(state);
default:
goto out_drop;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
@ 2010-04-07 23:06 ` Al Viro
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Al Viro @ 2010-04-07 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki,
Andrew Morton, Kernel Testers List, Network Development,
Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List,
DRI
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 03:22:20PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Al Viro wrote:
> >
> > No, it's not the same thing; the fix is to have nfs ->d_revalidate()
> > return an error on failing open attempt (in insane codepath that has
> > ->d_revalidate() handling open()). Confirmed to work by reporter...
>
> Ok, can you do the proper changelog description and sign-offs etc?
[PATCH] Have nfs ->d_revalidate() report errors properly
If nfs atomic open implementation ends up doing open request from
->d_revalidate() codepath and gets an error from server, return that error
to caller explicitly and don't bother with lookup_instantiate_filp() at all.
->d_revalidate() can return an error itself just fine...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
---
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index d79a7b3..fe0cd9e 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -2068,8 +2068,7 @@ nfs4_open_revalidate(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, int openflags, st
case -EDQUOT:
case -ENOSPC:
case -EROFS:
- lookup_instantiate_filp(nd, (struct dentry *)state, NULL);
- return 1;
+ return PTR_ERR(state);
default:
goto out_drop;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
2010-04-07 22:22 ` Linus Torvalds
(?)
(?)
@ 2010-04-07 23:06 ` Al Viro
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Al Viro @ 2010-04-07 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton,
Kernel Testers List, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 03:22:20PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Al Viro wrote:
> >
> > No, it's not the same thing; the fix is to have nfs ->d_revalidate()
> > return an error on failing open attempt (in insane codepath that has
> > ->d_revalidate() handling open()). Confirmed to work by reporter...
>
> Ok, can you do the proper changelog description and sign-offs etc?
[PATCH] Have nfs ->d_revalidate() report errors properly
If nfs atomic open implementation ends up doing open request from
->d_revalidate() codepath and gets an error from server, return that error
to caller explicitly and don't bother with lookup_instantiate_filp() at all.
->d_revalidate() can return an error itself just fine...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index d79a7b3..fe0cd9e 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -2068,8 +2068,7 @@ nfs4_open_revalidate(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, int openflags, st
case -EDQUOT:
case -ENOSPC:
case -EROFS:
- lookup_instantiate_filp(nd, (struct dentry *)state, NULL);
- return 1;
+ return PTR_ERR(state);
default:
goto out_drop;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
2010-04-07 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-07 22:19 ` Al Viro
@ 2010-04-07 22:19 ` Al Viro
2010-04-08 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-08 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
3 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Al Viro @ 2010-04-07 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton,
Kernel Testers List, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 03:04:46PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674
> > Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure...
> > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old)
> > Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082@mail.gmail.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2
>
> This smells like the same LOOKUP_DIRECTORY thing as the first entry, but..
No, it's not the same thing; the fix is to have nfs ->d_revalidate()
return an error on failing open attempt (in insane codepath that has
->d_revalidate() handling open()). Confirmed to work by reporter...
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index d79a7b3..fe0cd9e 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -2068,8 +2068,7 @@ nfs4_open_revalidate(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, int openflags, st
case -EDQUOT:
case -ENOSPC:
case -EROFS:
- lookup_instantiate_filp(nd, (struct dentry *)state, NULL);
- return 1;
+ return PTR_ERR(state);
default:
goto out_drop;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
@ 2010-04-08 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI,
Al Viro
On Thursday 08 April 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718
> > Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774
> > Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5
> > Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802@panasas.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4
> > Handled-By : Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
>
> I think this one is fixed by commit 3e297b61349.
Closed.
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716
> > Subject : ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1
> > Submitter : Andrew Benton <b3nton@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-11 16:57 (28 days old)
> > Message-ID : <4B992110.2090300@gmail.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126832670609705&w=4
> > Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
>
> And isn't this the already long-fixed commit 332ac7ff77cd?
>
> That bugzilla entry is a duplicate of
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15537
>
> as far as I can see.
Yes, my bad, sorry. Closed.
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715
> > Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio
> > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26
> > Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4
> > Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
>
> That commit got reverted. See commit d6da1a5abc.
Closed.
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674
> > Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure...
> > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old)
> > Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082@mail.gmail.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2
>
> This smells like the same LOOKUP_DIRECTORY thing as the first entry, but..
>
> Al?
This one has been fixed too, I see, so closed.
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15600
> > Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1
> > Submitter : Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-15 15:28 (24 days old)
> > Message-ID : <4B9E5211.9000204@redhat.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866691701926&w=2
>
> These should hopefully be all fixed. There was some confusion over this,
> but the report that said it wasn't fixed in -rc3 was apparently not true
> after all. Several commits, but mainly commit eed63519e, iirc.
Closed.
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518
> > Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit
> > Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> > Date : 2010-03-11 15:37 (28 days old)
>
> Duplicate entry. See above.
Closed.
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480
> > Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs
> > Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old)
> > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
> > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512
>
> These are merged already. Commits d558b483d5, eb9fc8ef7cb etc.
Closed.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
@ 2010-04-08 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI,
Al Viro
On Thursday 08 April 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718
> > Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774
> > Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh-C4P08NqkoRlBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5
> > Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802-C4P08NqkoRlBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4
> > Handled-By : Al Viro <viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
>
> I think this one is fixed by commit 3e297b61349.
Closed.
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716
> > Subject : ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1
> > Submitter : Andrew Benton <b3nton-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-11 16:57 (28 days old)
> > Message-ID : <4B992110.2090300-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126832670609705&w=4
> > Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jeff-o2qLIJkoznsdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
>
> And isn't this the already long-fixed commit 332ac7ff77cd?
>
> That bugzilla entry is a duplicate of
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15537
>
> as far as I can see.
Yes, my bad, sorry. Closed.
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715
> > Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio
> > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26
> > Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983-U5EdaLXB8smDugQYiPIPGdh3ngVCH38I@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4
> > Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
> > Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>
> That commit got reverted. See commit d6da1a5abc.
Closed.
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674
> > Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure...
> > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old)
> > Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2
>
> This smells like the same LOOKUP_DIRECTORY thing as the first entry, but..
>
> Al?
This one has been fixed too, I see, so closed.
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15600
> > Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1
> > Submitter : Avi Kivity <avi-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-15 15:28 (24 days old)
> > Message-ID : <4B9E5211.9000204-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866691701926&w=2
>
> These should hopefully be all fixed. There was some confusion over this,
> but the report that said it wasn't fixed in -rc3 was apparently not true
> after all. Several commits, but mainly commit eed63519e, iirc.
Closed.
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518
> > Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit
> > Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel-/w4YWyX8dFk@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-11 15:37 (28 days old)
>
> Duplicate entry. See above.
Closed.
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480
> > Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs
> > Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti-jUE9FD3ILm5BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old)
> > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512
>
> These are merged already. Commits d558b483d5, eb9fc8ef7cb etc.
Closed.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
2010-04-07 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-08 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-08 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
3 siblings, 0 replies; 124+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-08 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux ACPI, Al Viro, Andrew Morton,
Kernel Testers List, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki
On Thursday 08 April 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15718
> > Subject : File corruption regression on NFS related to commit 1f36f774
> > Submitter : Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-24 15:49 (15 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/1f36f774b22a0ceb7dd33eca626746c81a97b6a5
> > Message-ID : <4BAA3493.1030802@panasas.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126944579810350&w=4
> > Handled-By : Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
>
> I think this one is fixed by commit 3e297b61349.
Closed.
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15716
> > Subject : ata2: lost interrupt with kernel 2.6.34-rc1
> > Submitter : Andrew Benton <b3nton@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-11 16:57 (28 days old)
> > Message-ID : <4B992110.2090300@gmail.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126832670609705&w=4
> > Handled-By : Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
>
> And isn't this the already long-fixed commit 332ac7ff77cd?
>
> That bugzilla entry is a duplicate of
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15537
>
> as far as I can see.
Yes, my bad, sorry. Closed.
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15715
> > Subject : vmscan: underflow for get_scan_ratio
> > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-30 5:53 (9 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/84b18490d1f1bc7ed5095c929f78bc002eb70f26
> > Message-ID : <20100330055304.GA2983@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126992842105754&w=4
> > Handled-By : KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
>
> That commit got reverted. See commit d6da1a5abc.
Closed.
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15674
> > Subject : [2.6.34-rc2 NFS4 oops] open error path failure...
> > Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-29 18:36 (10 days old)
> > Message-ID : <6278d2221003291136p6481fe8emfb039403343c082@mail.gmail.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126988782722711&w=2
>
> This smells like the same LOOKUP_DIRECTORY thing as the first entry, but..
>
> Al?
This one has been fixed too, I see, so closed.
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15600
> > Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM woes, 2.6.34-rc1
> > Submitter : Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-15 15:28 (24 days old)
> > Message-ID : <4B9E5211.9000204@redhat.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866691701926&w=2
>
> These should hopefully be all fixed. There was some confusion over this,
> but the report that said it wasn't fixed in -rc3 was apparently not true
> after all. Several commits, but mainly commit eed63519e, iirc.
Closed.
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15518
> > Subject : CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y breaks boot on 32bit
> > Submitter : Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> > Date : 2010-03-11 15:37 (28 days old)
>
> Duplicate entry. See above.
Closed.
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15480
> > Subject : [regression] Fails to boot properly unless given pci=nocrs
> > Submitter : Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@declera.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-09 01:24 (30 days old)
> > Handled-By : Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
> > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/11/512
>
> These are merged already. Commits d558b483d5, eb9fc8ef7cb etc.
Closed.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 124+ messages in thread