All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com>
To: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>,
	NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com" <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] ethdev: introduce conntrack flow action and item
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:05:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MN2PR12MB29099D1C03DAF01257AB8F41D04C9@MN2PR12MB2909.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR12MB49876DC49C2EB140BD870F39D64C9@DM6PR12MB4987.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Ori,
My comments are inline, PSB.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2021 8:42 PM
> To: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com>; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
> <thomas@monjalon.net>; ferruh.yigit@intel.com;
> andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] ethdev: introduce conntrack flow action
> and item
> 
> Hi Bing,
> 
> One more thought, PSB
> 
> Best,
> Ori
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 7:41 PM
> > To: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
> > <thomas@monjalon.net>; ferruh.yigit@intel.com;
> > andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] ethdev: introduce conntrack flow action
> and
> > item
> >
> > This commit introduced the conntrack action and item.
> >
> > Usually the HW offloading is stateless. For some stateful
> offloading
> > like a TCP connection, HW module will help provide the ability of
> a
> > full offloading w/o SW participation after the connection was
> > established.
> >
> > The basic usage is that in the first flow the application should
> add
> > the conntrack action and in the following flow(s) the application
> > should use the conntrack item to match on the result.
> >
> > A TCP connection has two directions traffic. To set a conntrack
> action
> > context correctly, information from packets of both directions are
> > required.
> >
> > The conntrack action should be created on one port and supply the
> peer
> > port as a parameter to the action. After context creating, it
> could
> > only be used between the ports (dual-port mode) or a single port.
> The
> > application should modify the action via the API
> > "action_handle_update" only when before using it to create a flow
> with
> > opposite direction. This will help the driver to recognize the
> > direction of the flow to be created, especially in single port
> mode.
> > The traffic from both directions will go through the same port if
> the
> > application works as an "forwarding engine" but not a end point.
> > There is no need to call the update interface if the subsequent
> flows
> > have nothing to be changed.
> >
> > Query will be supported via action_ctx_query interface, about the
> > current packets information and connection status. Tha fields
> query
> > capabilities depends on the HW.
> >
> > For the packets received during the conntrack setup, it is
> suggested
> > to re-inject the packets in order to take full advantage of the
> > conntrack. Only the valid packets should pass the conntrack,
> packets
> > with invalid TCP information, like out of window, or with invalid
> > header, like malformed, should not pass.
> >
> > Naming and definition:
> >
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fel
> ix
> >
> ir.bootlin.com%2Flinux%2Flatest%2Fsource%2Finclude%2Fuapi%2Flinux%2F
> ne
> >
> tfilter%2Fnf_co&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cbingz%40nvidia.com%7C29da48bebdc9
> 44
> >
> b0127508d900d4f89a%7C43083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C6375
> 41
> >
> 736960852707%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2l
> uM
> >
> zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=%2Bbsd48yNzMbhUyp
> In
> > kol%2B7LskVzx1WHj%2Fkd%2Fu0zks0A%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > nntrack_tcp.h
> >
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fel
> ix
> >
> ir.bootlin.com%2Flinux%2Flatest%2Fsource%2Fnet%2Fnetfilter%2Fnf_conn
> tr
> >
> ack_proto_&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cbingz%40nvidia.com%7C29da48bebdc944b01
> 27
> >
> 508d900d4f89a%7C43083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C637541736
> 96
> >
> 0852707%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIi
> LC
> >
> JBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=CwKk%2FgQWxRY22%2BAaCF
> OP
> > 1TbGphcqURrBFSf4NupMPPA%3D&amp;reserved=0
> > tcp.c
> >
> > Other reference:
> >
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fww
> w.
> >
> usenix.org%2Flegacy%2Fevents%2Fsec01%2Finvitedtalks%2Frooij.pdf&amp;
> da
> >
> ta=04%7C01%7Cbingz%40nvidia.com%7C29da48bebdc944b0127508d900d4f89a%7
> C4
> >
> 3083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C637541736960852707%7CUnkno
> wn
> > %7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWw
> iLCJ
> >
> XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=geKUBifelEBuFzQviu%2FPeV19DOjWzZAbdAlo%
> 2B
> > cVX%2FXs%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.c |   2 +
> >  lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h | 195
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 197 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.c
> > b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.c index 27a161559d..0af601d508 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.c
> > @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ static const struct rte_flow_desc_data
> > rte_flow_desc_item[] = {
> >  	MK_FLOW_ITEM(PFCP, sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_pfcp)),
> >  	MK_FLOW_ITEM(ECPRI, sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_ecpri)),
> >  	MK_FLOW_ITEM(GENEVE_OPT, sizeof(struct
> rte_flow_item_geneve_opt)),
> > +	MK_FLOW_ITEM(CONNTRACK, sizeof(uint32_t)),
> >  };
> >
> >  /** Generate flow_action[] entry. */
> > @@ -186,6 +187,7 @@ static const struct rte_flow_desc_data
> > rte_flow_desc_action[] = {
> >  	 * indirect action handle.
> >  	 */
> >  	MK_FLOW_ACTION(INDIRECT, 0),
> > +	MK_FLOW_ACTION(CONNTRACK, sizeof(struct
> > rte_flow_action_conntrack)),
> >  };
> >
> >  int
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h index 91ae25b1da..024d1a2026 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > @@ -551,6 +551,15 @@ enum rte_flow_item_type {
> >  	 * See struct rte_flow_item_geneve_opt
> >  	 */
> >  	RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_GENEVE_OPT,
> > +
> > +	/**
> > +	 * [META]
> > +	 *
> > +	 * Matches conntrack state.
> > +	 *
> > +	 * See struct rte_flow_item_conntrack.
> > +	 */
> > +	RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_CONNTRACK,
> >  };
> >
> >  /**
> > @@ -1685,6 +1694,51 @@ rte_flow_item_geneve_opt_mask = {  };
> #endif
> >
> > +/**
> > + * The packet is with valid state after conntrack checking.
> > + */
> > +#define RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_FLAG_PKT_STATE_VALID (1 << 0)
> > +/**
> > + * The state of the connection was changed.
> > + */
> > +#define RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_FLAG_PKT_STATE_CHANGED (1 << 1)
> > +/**
> > + * Error is detected on this packet for this connection and
> > + * an invalid state is set.
> > + */
> > +#define RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_FLAG_PKT_STATE_INVAL (1 << 2)
> > +/**
> > + * The HW connection tracking module is disabled.
> > + * It can be due to application command or an invalid state.
> > + */
> > +#define RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_FLAG_HW_DISABLED (1 << 3)
> > +/**
> > + * The packet contains some bad field(s) and cannot continue
> > + * with the conntrack module checking.
> > + */
> > +#define RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_FLAG_PKT_BAD (1 << 4)
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * @warning
> > + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this structure may change without prior
> notice
> > + *
> > + * RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_CONNTRACK
> > + *
> > + * Matches the state of a packet after it passed the connection
> > +tracking
> > + * examination. The state is a bit mask of one
> > +RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_FLAG*
> > + * or a reasonable combination of these bits.
> > + */
> > +struct rte_flow_item_conntrack {
> > +	uint32_t flags;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/** Default mask for RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_CONNTRACK. */ #ifndef
> > +__cplusplus static const struct rte_flow_item_conntrack
> > +rte_flow_item_conntrack_mask =
> > {
> > +	.flags = 0xffffffff,
> > +};
> > +#endif
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * Matching pattern item definition.
> >   *
> > @@ -2277,6 +2331,17 @@ enum rte_flow_action_type {
> >  	 * same port or across different ports.
> >  	 */
> >  	RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_INDIRECT,
> > +
> > +	/**
> > +	 * [META]
> > +	 *
> > +	 * Enable tracking a TCP connection state.
> > +	 *
> > +	 * Send packet to HW connection tracking module for
> examination.
> > +	 *
> > +	 * See struct rte_flow_action_conntrack.
> > +	 */
> > +	RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_CONNTRACK,
> >  };
> >
> >  /**
> > @@ -2875,6 +2940,136 @@ struct rte_flow_action_set_dscp {
> >   */
> >  struct rte_flow_action_handle;
> >
> > +/**
> > + * The state of a TCP connection.
> > + */
> > +enum rte_flow_conntrack_state {
> > +	/**< SYN-ACK packet was seen. */
> > +	RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_STATE_SYN_RECV,
> > +	/**< 3-way handshark was done. */
> > +	RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_STATE_ESTABLISHED,
> > +	/**< First FIN packet was received to close the connection. */
> > +	RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_STATE_FIN_WAIT,
> > +	/**< First FIN was ACKed. */
> > +	RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_STATE_CLOSE_WAIT,
> > +	/**< Second FIN was received, waiting for the last ACK. */
> > +	RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_STATE_LAST_ACK,
> > +	/**< Second FIN was ACKed, connection was closed. */
> > +	RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_STATE_TIME_WAIT,
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * The last passed TCP packet flags of a connection.
> > + */
> > +enum rte_flow_conntrack_tcp_last_index {
> > +	RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_FLAG_NONE = 0, /**< No Flag. */
> > +	RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_FLAG_SYN = (1 << 0), /**< With SYN flag. */
> > +	RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_FLAG_SYNACK = (1 << 1), /**< With SYN+ACK
> > flag. */
> > +	RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_FLAG_FIN = (1 << 2), /**< With FIN flag. */
> > +	RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_FLAG_ACK = (1 << 3), /**< With ACK flag. */
> > +	RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_FLAG_RST = (1 << 4), /**< With RST flag.
> */ };
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * @warning
> > + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this structure may change without prior
> notice
> > + *
> > + * Configuration parameters for each direction of a TCP
> connection.
> > + */
> > +struct rte_flow_tcp_dir_param {
> > +	uint32_t scale:4; /**< TCP window scaling factor, 0xF to
> disable. */
> > +	uint32_t close_initiated:1; /**< The FIN was sent by this
> direction. */
> > +	/**< An ACK packet has been received by this side. */
> > +	uint32_t last_ack_seen:1;
> > +	/**< If set, indicates that there is unacked data of the
> connection. */
> > +	uint32_t data_unacked:1;
> > +	/**< Maximal value of sequence + payload length over sent
> > +	 * packets (next ACK from the opposite direction).
> > +	 */
> > +	uint32_t sent_end;
> > +	/**< Maximal value of (ACK + window size) over received packet
> +
> > length
> > +	 * over sent packet (maximal sequence could be sent).
> > +	 */
> > +	uint32_t reply_end;
> 
> This comment is for all members that are part of the packet, Do you
> think it should be in network order?

Almost none of the fields are part of the packet. Indeed, most of them are calculated from the packets information. So I prefer to keep the host order easy for using and
keep all the fields of the whole structure the same endianness format.
What do you think?

> I can see the advantage in both ways nice I assume the app needs
> this data in host byte-order  but since in most other cases we use
> network byte-order to set values that are coming from the packet
> itself maybe it is better to use network byte-order (will also save
> the conversion)

Only the seq/ack/window in the common part are part of the packets, others are not.

BTW, should we support liberal mode separately for both direction as some "half-duplex". One direction could work normally and the opposite direct will work in the liberal mode?

> 
> > +	/**< Maximal value of actual window size over sent packets. */
> > +	uint32_t max_win;
> > +	/**< Maximal value of ACK over sent packets. */
> > +	uint32_t max_ack;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * @warning
> > + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this structure may change without prior
> notice
> > + *
> > + * RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_CONNTRACK
> > + *
> > + * Configuration and initial state for the connection tracking
> module.
> > + * This structure could be used for both setting and query.
> > + */
> > +struct rte_flow_action_conntrack {
> > +	uint16_t peer_port; /**< The peer port number, can be the same
> port.
> > */
> > +	/**< Direction of this connection when creating a flow, the
> value only
> > +	 * affects the subsequent flows creation.
> > +	 */
> > +	uint32_t is_original_dir:1;
> > +	/**< Enable / disable the conntrack HW module. When disabled,
> the
> > +	 * result will always be RTE_FLOW_CONNTRACK_FLAG_DISABLED.
> > +	 * In this state the HW will act as passthrough.
> > +	 * It only affects this conntrack object in the HW without any
> effect
> > +	 * to the other objects.
> > +	 */
> > +	uint32_t enable:1;
> > +	/**< At least one ack was seen, after the connection was
> established.
> > */
> > +	uint32_t live_connection:1;
> > +	/**< Enable selective ACK on this connection. */
> > +	uint32_t selective_ack:1;
> > +	/**< A challenge ack has passed. */
> > +	uint32_t challenge_ack_passed:1;
> > +	/**< 1: The last packet is seen that comes from the original
> direction.
> > +	 * 0: From the reply direction.
> > +	 */
> > +	uint32_t last_direction:1;
> > +	/**< No TCP check will be done except the state change. */
> > +	uint32_t liberal_mode:1;
> > +	/**< The current state of the connection. */
> > +	enum rte_flow_conntrack_state state;
> > +	/**< Scaling factor for maximal allowed ACK window. */
> > +	uint8_t max_ack_window;
> > +	/**< Maximal allowed number of retransmission times. */
> > +	uint8_t retransmission_limit;
> > +	/**< TCP parameters of the original direction. */
> > +	struct rte_flow_tcp_dir_param original_dir;
> > +	/**< TCP parameters of the reply direction. */
> > +	struct rte_flow_tcp_dir_param reply_dir;
> > +	/**< The window value of the last packet passed this conntrack.
> */
> > +	uint16_t last_window;
> > +	enum rte_flow_conntrack_tcp_last_index last_index;
> > +	/**< The sequence of the last packet passed this conntrack. */
> > +	uint32_t last_seq;
> > +	/**< The acknowledgement of the last packet passed this
> conntrack. */
> > +	uint32_t last_ack;
> > +	/**< The total value ACK + payload length of the last packet
> passed
> > +	 * this conntrack.
> > +	 */
> > +	uint32_t last_end;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_CONNTRACK
> > + *
> > + * Wrapper structure for the context update interface.
> > + * Ports cannot support updating, and the only valid solution is
> to
> > + * destroy the old context and create a new one instead.
> > + */
> > +struct rte_flow_modify_conntrack {
> > +	/**< New connection tracking parameters to be updated. */
> > +	struct rte_flow_action_conntrack new_ct;
> > +	uint32_t direction:1; /**< The direction field will be updated.
> */
> > +	/**< All the other fields except direction will be updated. */
> > +	uint32_t state:1;
> > +	uint32_t reserved:30; /**< Reserved bits for the future usage.
> */ };
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * Field IDs for MODIFY_FIELD action.
> >   */
> > --
> > 2.19.0.windows.1

BR. Bing

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-16 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-18  7:30 [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: introduce conntrack flow action and item Bing Zhao
2021-03-22 15:16 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-04-07  7:43   ` Bing Zhao
2021-03-23 23:27 ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-04-07  2:41   ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-10 13:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Bing Zhao
2021-04-15 16:24   ` Ori Kam
2021-04-15 16:44     ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-15 16:41   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] " Bing Zhao
2021-04-15 16:41     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] " Bing Zhao
2021-04-16 10:49       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-16 18:18         ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-16 12:41       ` Ori Kam
2021-04-16 18:05         ` Bing Zhao [this message]
2021-04-16 21:47           ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-04-17  6:10             ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-17 14:54               ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-04-15 16:41     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] app/testpmd: add CLI for conntrack Bing Zhao
2021-04-16  8:46       ` Ori Kam
2021-04-16 18:20         ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-16 17:54   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] ethdev: introduce conntrack flow action and item Bing Zhao
2021-04-16 17:54     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] " Bing Zhao
2021-04-16 18:30       ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-04-19 14:08         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-19 16:21           ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 14:06       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-19 16:13         ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-16 17:54     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] app/testpmd: add CLI for conntrack Bing Zhao
2021-04-16 17:54     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] doc: update " Bing Zhao
2021-04-16 18:22       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-16 18:30       ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-04-19 17:28         ` Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 17:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] ethdev: introduce conntrack flow action and item Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 17:16     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] " Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 17:33       ` Ori Kam
2021-04-19 17:16     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] app/testpmd: add CLI for conntrack Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 17:35       ` Ori Kam
2021-04-19 17:16     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] doc: update " Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 17:32       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-19 17:37       ` Ori Kam
2021-04-19 17:51   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] ethdev: introduce conntrack flow action and item Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 17:51     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] " Bing Zhao
2021-04-19 18:07       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-19 23:29         ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-19 17:51     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] app/testpmd: add CLI for conntrack Bing Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MN2PR12MB29099D1C03DAF01257AB8F41D04C9@MN2PR12MB2909.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=bingz@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=orika@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.