RE: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/powerplay/smu10: add support for gpu busy query

["Lazar, Lijo" <Lijo.Lazar@amd.com>]

[AMD Public Use]



-----Original Message-----
From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Alex Deucher
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 9:42 AM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/powerplay/smu10: add support for gpu busy query

Was added in newer versions of the firmware.  Add support for it.

Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/rv_ppsmc.h         |  1 +
 .../drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.c  | 30 ++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/rv_ppsmc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/rv_ppsmc.h
index 4c7e08ba5fa4..171f12b82716 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/rv_ppsmc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/rv_ppsmc.h
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@
 #define PPSMC_MSG_PowerGateMmHub                0x35
 #define PPSMC_MSG_SetRccPfcPmeRestoreRegister   0x36
 #define PPSMC_MSG_GpuChangeState                0x37
+#define PPSMC_MSG_GetGfxBusy                    0x3D
 #define PPSMC_Message_Count                     0x42
 
 typedef uint16_t PPSMC_Result;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.c
index c932b632ddd4..52fcdec738e9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/smu10_hwmgr.c
@@ -1261,9 +1261,21 @@ static int smu10_read_sensor(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr, int idx,
 			  void *value, int *size)
 {
 	struct smu10_hwmgr *smu10_data = (struct smu10_hwmgr *)(hwmgr->backend);
-	uint32_t sclk, mclk;
+	struct amdgpu_device *adev = hwmgr->adev;
+	uint32_t sclk, mclk, activity_percent;
+	bool has_gfx_busy;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	/* GetGfxBusy support was added on RV SMU FW 30.85.00 and PCO 4.30.59 */
+	if ((adev->apu_flags & AMD_APU_IS_PICASSO) &&
+	    (hwmgr->smu_version >= 0x41e3b))
+		has_gfx_busy = true;
+	else if ((adev->apu_flags & AMD_APU_IS_RAVEN) &&
+		 (hwmgr->smu_version >= 0x1e5500))
+		has_gfx_busy = true;
+	else
+		has_gfx_busy = false;
+
 	switch (idx) {
 	case AMDGPU_PP_SENSOR_GFX_SCLK:
 		smum_send_msg_to_smc(hwmgr, PPSMC_MSG_GetGfxclkFrequency, &sclk); @@ -1284,6 +1296,22 @@ static int smu10_read_sensor(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr, int idx,
 		*(uint32_t *)value =  smu10_data->vcn_power_gated ? 0 : 1;
 		*size = 4;
 		break;
+	case AMDGPU_PP_SENSOR_GPU_LOAD:
+		if (has_gfx_busy) {
+			ret = smum_send_msg_to_smc(hwmgr,
+						   PPSMC_MSG_GetGfxBusy,
+						   &activity_percent);
+			if (!ret) {
+				activity_percent = activity_percent > 100 ? 100 : activity_percent;
+			} else {
+				activity_percent = 50;

<> Why this is assumed? Isn't this as good as not supported?

Thanks,
Lijo

+			}
+			*((uint32_t *)value) = activity_percent;
+			return 0;
+		} else {
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		}
+		break;
 	default:
 		ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 		break;
--
2.29.2

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Famd-gfx&amp;data=04%7C01%7Clijo.lazar%40amd.com%7C4ae33de1e1cb46155eef08d8e37aaf58%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637509463368911804%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=2KX02OYjW4d7%2FFK3dOUz6kiBb8MUItOSOqoDEnu8Lrk%3D&amp;reserved=0
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx