All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Cc: "boris.brezillon@bootlin.com" <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>,
	"richard@nod.at" <richard@nod.at>,
	"wmw2@infradead.org" <wmw2@infradead.org>,
	"computersforpeace@gmail.com" <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	"marek.vasut@gmail.com" <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	"f.fainelli@gmail.com" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"mmayer@broadcom.com" <mmayer@broadcom.com>,
	"rogerq@ti.com" <rogerq@ti.com>,
	"ladis@linux-mips.org" <ladis@linux-mips.org>,
	"ada@thorsis.com" <ada@thorsis.com>,
	"honghui.zhang@mediatek.com" <honghui.zhang@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"nagasureshkumarrelli@gmail.com" <nagasureshkumarrelli@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [LINUX PATCH v9 2/4] memory: pl353: Add driver for arm pl353 static memory controller
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 10:54:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MWHPR02MB2623C67196CAFD239736B6A1AF700@MWHPR02MB2623.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180607180710.5b53e95b@xps13>

Hi Miquel,

Sorry for the late reply.
Currently I am addressing the comments that you gave to  pl353_nand driver.
And done with those, but this is pending.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Miquel Raynal [mailto:miquel.raynal@bootlin.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 9:37 PM
> To: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>
> Cc: boris.brezillon@bootlin.com; richard@nod.at; wmw2@infradead.org;
> computersforpeace@gmail.com; marek.vasut@gmail.com; f.fainelli@gmail.com;
> mmayer@broadcom.com; rogerq@ti.com; ladis@linux-mips.org; ada@thorsis.com;
> honghui.zhang@mediatek.com; linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> nagasureshkumarrelli@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH v9 2/4] memory: pl353: Add driver for arm pl353 static
> memory controller
> 
> Hi Naga,
> 
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 13:19:40 +0530, Naga Sureshkumar Relli
> <naga.sureshkumar.relli@xilinx.com> wrote:
> 
> > Add driver for arm pl353 static memory controller. This controller is
> > used in xilinx zynq soc for interfacing the nand and nor/sram memory
> > devices.
> 
> Upper case: Xilinx Zynq, SoC, NAND, NOR, SRAM.
Ok, I will update it in next version.

> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Naga Sureshkumar Relli
> > <naga.sureshkumar.relli@xilinx.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v9:
> >  - Addressed the comments given by Julia Cartwright to the v8 series.
> > Changes in v8:
> > - None
> > Changes in v7:
> > - Corrected the kconfig to use tristate selection
> > - Corrected the GPL licence ident
> > - Added boundary checks for nand timing parameters Changes in v6:
> > - Fixed checkpatch.pl reported warnings Changes in v5:
> > - Added pl353_smc_get_clkrate function, made pl353_smc_set_cycles as public
> >   API
> > - Removed nand timing parameter initialization and moved it to nand
> > driver Changes in v4:
> > - Modified driver to support multiple instances
> > - Used sleep instaed of busywait for delay Changes in v3:
> > - None
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Since now the timing parameters are in nano seconds, added logic to convert
> >   them to the cycles
> > ---
> >  drivers/memory/Kconfig                  |   8 +
> >  drivers/memory/Makefile                 |   1 +
> >  drivers/memory/pl353-smc.c              | 523
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/platform_data/pl353-smc.h |  29 ++
> >  4 files changed, 561 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/memory/pl353-smc.c  create mode 100644
> > include/linux/platform_data/pl353-smc.h
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/memory/Kconfig b/drivers/memory/Kconfig index
> > 19a0e83..9517da7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/memory/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/memory/Kconfig
> > @@ -153,6 +153,14 @@ config DA8XX_DDRCTL
> >  	  Texas Instruments da8xx SoCs. It's used to tweak various memory
> >  	  controller configuration options.
> >
> > +config PL353_SMC
> > +	tristate "ARM PL35X Static Memory Controller(SMC) driver"
> > +	default y
> 
> This is not restricive at all. If this controller is only on a specific SoC, you should add another
> condition to compile the driver?
Can I add some thing like this?
depends on  ARCH_ZYNQ
depends on  ARM
> 
> > +	depends on ARM
> 
> Or here             ^
> 
> > +	help
> > +	  This driver is for the ARM PL351/PL353 Static Memory
> > +	  Controller(SMC) module.
> > +
> >  source "drivers/memory/samsung/Kconfig"
> >  source "drivers/memory/tegra/Kconfig"
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/memory/Makefile b/drivers/memory/Makefile index
> > 66f5524..58e794d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/memory/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/memory/Makefile
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TEGRA20_MC)	+= tegra20-mc.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_JZ4780_NEMC)	+= jz4780-nemc.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_SMI)		+= mtk-smi.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_DA8XX_DDRCTL)	+= da8xx-ddrctl.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_PL353_SMC)		+= pl353-smc.o
> >
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SAMSUNG_MC)	+= samsung/
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_TEGRA_MC)		+= tegra/
> > diff --git a/drivers/memory/pl353-smc.c b/drivers/memory/pl353-smc.c
> > new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8758930
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/memory/pl353-smc.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,523 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * ARM PL353 SMC driver
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2012 Xilinx, Inc
> > + * Author: Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri <punnaiah@xilinx.com>
> > + * Author: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xilinx.com>
> > + *
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/clk.h>
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_data/pl353-smc.h>
> > +
> > +/* Register definitions */
> > +#define PL353_SMC_MEMC_STATUS_OFFS	0	/* Controller status reg, RO
> */
> > +#define PL353_SMC_CFG_CLR_OFFS		0xC	/* Clear config reg, WO */
> > +#define PL353_SMC_DIRECT_CMD_OFFS	0x10	/* Direct command reg, WO
> */
> > +#define PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_OFFS	0x14	/* Set cycles register, WO */
> > +#define PL353_SMC_SET_OPMODE_OFFS	0x18	/* Set opmode register, WO */
> > +#define PL353_SMC_ECC_STATUS_OFFS	0x400	/* ECC status register */
> > +#define PL353_SMC_ECC_MEMCFG_OFFS	0x404	/* ECC mem config reg */
> > +#define PL353_SMC_ECC_MEMCMD1_OFFS	0x408	/* ECC mem cmd1 reg */
> > +#define PL353_SMC_ECC_MEMCMD2_OFFS	0x40C	/* ECC mem cmd2 reg */
> > +#define PL353_SMC_ECC_VALUE0_OFFS	0x418	/* ECC value 0 reg */
> > +
> > +/* Controller status register specific constants */
> > +#define PL353_SMC_MEMC_STATUS_RAW_INT_1_SHIFT	6
> > +
> > +/* Clear configuration register specific constants */
> > +#define PL353_SMC_CFG_CLR_INT_CLR_1	0x10
> > +#define PL353_SMC_CFG_CLR_ECC_INT_DIS_1	0x40
> > +#define PL353_SMC_CFG_CLR_INT_DIS_1	0x2
> > +#define PL353_SMC_CFG_CLR_DEFAULT_MASK
> 	(PL353_SMC_CFG_CLR_INT_CLR_1 | \
> > +					 PL353_SMC_CFG_CLR_ECC_INT_DIS_1 | \
> > +					 PL353_SMC_CFG_CLR_INT_DIS_1)
> > +
> > +/* Set cycles register specific constants */
> > +#define PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T0_MASK	0xF
> > +#define PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T0_SHIFT	0
> > +#define PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T1_MASK	0xF
> > +#define PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T1_SHIFT	4
> > +#define PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T2_MASK	0x7
> > +#define PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T2_SHIFT	8
> > +#define PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T3_MASK	0x7
> > +#define PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T3_SHIFT	11
> > +#define PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T4_MASK	0x7
> > +#define PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T4_SHIFT	14
> > +#define PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T5_MASK	0x7
> > +#define PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T5_SHIFT	17
> > +#define PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T6_MASK	0xF
> > +#define PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T6_SHIFT	20
> > +
> > +/* ECC status register specific constants */
> > +#define PL353_SMC_ECC_STATUS_BUSY	BIT(6)
> > +
> > +/* ECC memory config register specific constants */
> > +#define PL353_SMC_ECC_MEMCFG_MODE_MASK	0xC
> > +#define PL353_SMC_ECC_MEMCFG_MODE_SHIFT	2
> > +#define PL353_SMC_ECC_MEMCFG_PGSIZE_MASK	0xC
> > +
> > +#define PL353_SMC_DC_UPT_NAND_REGS	((4 << 23) |	/* CS: NAND chip */
> \
> > +				 (2 << 21))	/* UpdateRegs operation */
> > +
> > +#define PL353_NAND_ECC_CMD1	((0x80)       |	/* Write command */ \
> > +				 (0 << 8)     |	/* Read command */ \
> > +				 (0x30 << 16) |	/* Read End command */ \
> > +				 (1 << 24))	/* Read End command calid */
> > +
> > +#define PL353_NAND_ECC_CMD2	((0x85)	      |	/* Write col change cmd */ \
> > +				 (5 << 8)     |	/* Read col change cmd */ \
> > +				 (0xE0 << 16) |	/* Read col change end cmd */ \
> > +				 (1 << 24)) /* Read col change end cmd valid */
> > +#define PL353_NAND_ECC_BUSY_TIMEOUT	(1 * HZ)
> > +/**
> > + * struct pl353_smc_data - Private smc driver structure
> > + * @devclk:		Pointer to the peripheral clock
> > + * @aperclk:		Pointer to the APER clock
> > + */
> > +struct pl353_smc_data {
> > +	struct clk		*memclk;
> > +	struct clk		*aclk;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* SMC virtual register base */
> > +static void __iomem *pl353_smc_base;
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * pl353_smc_set_buswidth - Set memory buswidth
> > + * @bw:	Memory buswidth (8 | 16)
> > + * Return: 0 on success or negative errno.
> > + */
> > +int pl353_smc_set_buswidth(unsigned int bw) {
> > +	if (bw != PL353_SMC_MEM_WIDTH_8  && bw !=
> PL353_SMC_MEM_WIDTH_16)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	writel(bw, pl353_smc_base + PL353_SMC_SET_OPMODE_OFFS);
> > +	writel(PL353_SMC_DC_UPT_NAND_REGS, pl353_smc_base +
> > +	       PL353_SMC_DIRECT_CMD_OFFS);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pl353_smc_set_buswidth);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * pl353_smc_set_cycles - Set memory timing parameters
> > + * @t0:	t_rc		read cycle time
> > + * @t1:	t_wc		write cycle time
> > + * @t2:	t_rea/t_ceoe	output enable assertion delay
> > + * @t3:	t_wp		write enable deassertion delay
> > + * @t4:	t_clr/t_pc	page cycle time
> > + * @t5:	t_ar/t_ta	ID read time/turnaround time
> > + * @t6:	t_rr		busy to RE timing
> > + *
> > + * Sets NAND chip specific timing parameters.
> > + */
> > +static void pl353_smc_set_cycles(u32 t0, u32 t1, u32 t2, u32 t3, u32
> > +			      t4, u32 t5, u32 t6)
> > +{
> > +	t0 &= PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T0_MASK;
> > +	t1 = (t1 & PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T1_MASK) <<
> > +			PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T1_SHIFT;
> > +	t2 = (t2 & PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T2_MASK) <<
> > +			PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T2_SHIFT;
> > +	t3 = (t3 & PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T3_MASK) <<
> > +			PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T3_SHIFT;
> > +	t4 = (t4 & PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T4_MASK) <<
> > +			PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T4_SHIFT;
> > +	t5 = (t5 & PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T5_MASK) <<
> > +			PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T5_SHIFT;
> > +	t6 = (t6 & PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T6_MASK) <<
> > +			PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_T6_SHIFT;
> > +
> > +	t0 |= t1 | t2 | t3 | t4 | t5 | t6;
> > +
> > +	writel(t0, pl353_smc_base + PL353_SMC_SET_CYCLES_OFFS);
> > +	writel(PL353_SMC_DC_UPT_NAND_REGS, pl353_smc_base +
> > +	       PL353_SMC_DIRECT_CMD_OFFS);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * pl353_smc_ecc_is_busy - Read ecc busy flag
> > + * Return: the ecc_status bit from the ecc_status register. 1 = busy,
> > +0 = idle  */ int pl353_smc_ecc_is_busy(void) {
> > +	return !!(readl(pl353_smc_base + PL353_SMC_ECC_STATUS_OFFS) &
> > +		  PL353_SMC_ECC_STATUS_BUSY);
> 
> You can return a bool and avoid the '!!'.
Ok, I will update in next version.
> 
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pl353_smc_ecc_is_busy);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * pl353_smc_get_ecc_val - Read ecc_valueN registers
> > + * @ecc_reg:	Index of the ecc_value reg (0..3)
> > + * Return: the content of the requested ecc_value register.
> > + *
> > + * There are four valid ecc_value registers. The argument is
> > +truncated to stay
> > + * within this valid boundary.
> > + */
> > +u32 pl353_smc_get_ecc_val(int ecc_reg) {
> > +	u32 addr, reg;
> > +
> > +	ecc_reg &= 3;
> 
> This is not readable. Please check for the validity of ecc_reg with standard '<' '>' operators.
Ok, I will change it.
> 
> > +	addr = PL353_SMC_ECC_VALUE0_OFFS + (ecc_reg << 2);
> 
> 2 should be defined
> 
> > +	reg = readl(pl353_smc_base + addr);
> > +
> > +	return reg;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pl353_smc_get_ecc_val);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * pl353_smc_get_nand_int_status_raw - Get NAND interrupt status bit
> > + * Return: the raw_int_status1 bit from the memc_status register
> 
> If you use kernel-doc format, should be "@return".
Ok, I will update it.
> 
> > + */
> > +int pl353_smc_get_nand_int_status_raw(void)
> > +{
> > +	u32 reg;
> > +
> > +	reg = readl(pl353_smc_base + PL353_SMC_MEMC_STATUS_OFFS);
> > +	reg >>= PL353_SMC_MEMC_STATUS_RAW_INT_1_SHIFT;
> > +	reg &= 1;
> > +
> > +	return reg;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pl353_smc_get_nand_int_status_raw);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * pl353_smc_clr_nand_int - Clear NAND interrupt  */ void
> > +pl353_smc_clr_nand_int(void) {
> > +	writel(PL353_SMC_CFG_CLR_INT_CLR_1,
> > +	       pl353_smc_base + PL353_SMC_CFG_CLR_OFFS); }
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pl353_smc_clr_nand_int);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * pl353_smc_set_ecc_mode - Set SMC ECC mode
> > + * @mode:	ECC mode (BYPASS, APB, MEM)
> > + * Return: 0 on success or negative errno.
> > + */
> > +int pl353_smc_set_ecc_mode(enum pl353_smc_ecc_mode mode)
> > +{
> > +	u32 reg;
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	switch (mode) {
> > +	case PL353_SMC_ECCMODE_BYPASS:
> > +	case PL353_SMC_ECCMODE_APB:
> > +	case PL353_SMC_ECCMODE_MEM:
> > +
> > +		reg = readl(pl353_smc_base + PL353_SMC_ECC_MEMCFG_OFFS);
> > +		reg &= ~PL353_SMC_ECC_MEMCFG_MODE_MASK;
> > +		reg |= mode << PL353_SMC_ECC_MEMCFG_MODE_SHIFT;
> > +		writel(reg, pl353_smc_base + PL353_SMC_ECC_MEMCFG_OFFS);
> > +
> > +		break;
> > +	default:
> > +		ret = -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pl353_smc_set_ecc_mode);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * pl353_smc_set_ecc_pg_size - Set SMC ECC page size
> > + * @pg_sz:	ECC page size
> > + * Return: 0 on success or negative errno.
> > + */
> > +int pl353_smc_set_ecc_pg_size(unsigned int pg_sz)
> > +{
> > +	u32 reg, sz;
> > +
> > +	switch (pg_sz) {
> > +	case 0:
> > +		sz = 0;
> > +		break;
> > +	case SZ_512:
> > +		sz = 1;
> > +		break;
> > +	case SZ_1K:
> > +		sz = 2;
> > +		break;
> > +	case SZ_2K:
> > +		sz = 3;
> > +		break;
> > +	default:
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	reg = readl(pl353_smc_base + PL353_SMC_ECC_MEMCFG_OFFS);
> > +	reg &= ~PL353_SMC_ECC_MEMCFG_PGSIZE_MASK;
> > +	reg |= sz;
> > +	writel(reg, pl353_smc_base + PL353_SMC_ECC_MEMCFG_OFFS);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pl353_smc_set_ecc_pg_size);
> > +
> > +static int __maybe_unused pl353_smc_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct pl353_smc_data *pl353_smc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +
> > +	clk_disable(pl353_smc->memclk);
> > +	clk_disable(pl353_smc->aclk);
> 
> Are you sure you don't need to save any of the configured registers?
Yes
> 
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __maybe_unused pl353_smc_resume(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +	struct pl353_smc_data *pl353_smc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +
> > +	ret = clk_enable(pl353_smc->aclk);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "Cannot enable axi domain clock.\n");
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = clk_enable(pl353_smc->memclk);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "Cannot enable memory clock.\n");
> > +		clk_disable(pl353_smc->aclk);
> > +		return ret;
> > +	}
> 
> New line
Ok, I will update
> 
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(pl353_smc_dev_pm_ops, pl353_smc_suspend,
> > +			 pl353_smc_resume);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * pl353_smc_init_nand_interface - Initialize the NAND interface
> > + * @pdev:	Pointer to the platform_device struct
> > + * @nand_node:	Pointer to the pl353_nand device_node struct
> > + */
> > +static void pl353_smc_init_nand_interface(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > +					  struct device_node *nand_node)
> > +{
> > +	u32 t_rc, t_wc, t_rea, t_wp, t_clr, t_ar, t_rr;
> > +	int err;
> > +	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + PL353_NAND_ECC_BUSY_TIMEOUT;
> 
> Maybe this should be defined later in the code.
I will update in next version.
> 
> New line.
> 
> > +	/* nand-cycle-<X> property is refer to the NAND flash timing
> > +	 * mapping between dts and the NAND flash AC timing
> > +	 *  X  : AC timing name
> > +	 *  t0 : t_rc
> > +	 *  t1 : t_wc
> > +	 *  t2 : t_rea
> > +	 *  t3 : t_wp
> > +	 *  t4 : t_clr
> > +	 *  t5 : t_ar
> > +	 *  t6 : t_rr
> > +	 */
> > +	err = of_property_read_u32(nand_node, "arm,nand-cycle-t0", &t_rc);
> > +	if (err) {
> > +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "arm,nand-cycle-t0 not in device tree");
> > +		goto default_nand_timing;
> > +	}
> > +	err = of_property_read_u32(nand_node, "arm,nand-cycle-t1", &t_wc);
> > +	if (err) {
> > +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "arm,nand-cycle-t1 not in device tree");
> > +		goto default_nand_timing;
> > +	}
> > +	err = of_property_read_u32(nand_node, "arm,nand-cycle-t2", &t_rea);
> > +	if (err) {
> > +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "arm,nand-cycle-t2 not in device tree");
> > +		goto default_nand_timing;
> > +	}
> > +	err = of_property_read_u32(nand_node, "arm,nand-cycle-t3", &t_wp);
> > +	if (err) {
> > +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "arm,nand-cycle-t3 not in device tree");
> > +		goto default_nand_timing;
> > +	}
> > +	err = of_property_read_u32(nand_node, "arm,nand-cycle-t4", &t_clr);
> > +	if (err) {
> > +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "arm,nand-cycle-t4 not in device tree");
> > +		goto default_nand_timing;
> > +	}
> > +	err = of_property_read_u32(nand_node, "arm,nand-cycle-t5", &t_ar);
> > +	if (err) {
> > +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "arm,nand-cycle-t5 not in device tree");
> > +		goto default_nand_timing;
> > +	}
> > +	err = of_property_read_u32(nand_node, "arm,nand-cycle-t6", &t_rr);
> > +	if (err) {
> > +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "arm,nand-cycle-t6 not in device tree");
> > +		goto default_nand_timing;
> > +	}
> 
> See the comment in the bindings about this section.
Any way I am removing the above parameters reading as per your comment.
I will implement setup_data_interface() hook to get the timings. And this 
Applies to below comments as well.
> 
> > +
> > +default_nand_timing:
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Default assume 50MHz clock (20ns cycle time) and 3V operation
> > +	 * The SET_CYCLES_REG register value depends on the flash device.
> > +	 * Look in to the device datasheet and change its value, This value
> > +	 * is for 2Gb Numonyx flash.
> 
> No :)
> 
> The controller is not supposed to work with only one chip, right? So it
> should not embed any chip-specific information.
> 
> If this chip is not ONFI nor JEDEC and is not supported yet, the right
> way to do is to write a manufacturer driver.
> 
> > +	 */
> > +	if (err) {
> > +		/* set default NAND flash timing property */
> > +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Using default timing for");
> > +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "2Gb Numonyx MT29F2G08ABAEAWP NAND
> flash");
> > +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "t_wp, t_clr, t_ar are set to 2");
> > +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "t_rc, t_wc, t_rr are set to 4");
> > +		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "t_rea is set to 1");
> > +		t_rc = 4;
> > +		t_wc = 4;
> > +		t_rr = 4;
> > +		t_rea = 1;
> > +		t_wp = 2;
> > +		t_clr = 2;
> > +		t_ar = 2;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	pl353_smc_set_buswidth(PL353_SMC_MEM_WIDTH_8);
> > +	pl353_smc_set_cycles(t_rc, t_wc, t_rea, t_wp, t_clr, t_ar, t_rr);
> > +	writel(PL353_SMC_CFG_CLR_INT_CLR_1,
> > +	       pl353_smc_base + PL353_SMC_CFG_CLR_OFFS);
> > +	writel(PL353_SMC_DC_UPT_NAND_REGS, pl353_smc_base +
> > +	       PL353_SMC_DIRECT_CMD_OFFS);
> > +	/* Wait till the ECC operation is complete */
> > +	do {
> > +		if (pl353_smc_ecc_is_busy())
> > +			cpu_relax();
> > +		else
> > +			break;
> > +	} while (!time_after_eq(jiffies, timeout));
> > +
> > +	if (time_after_eq(jiffies, timeout))
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "nand ecc busy status timed out");
> > +
> > +	writel(PL353_NAND_ECC_CMD1,
> > +	       pl353_smc_base + PL353_SMC_ECC_MEMCMD1_OFFS);
> > +	writel(PL353_NAND_ECC_CMD2,
> > +	       pl353_smc_base + PL353_SMC_ECC_MEMCMD2_OFFS);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id pl353_smc_supported_children[] = {
> > +	{ .compatible = "cfi-flash" },
> > +	{ .compatible = "arm,pl353-nand-r2p1",
> > +	.data = pl353_smc_init_nand_interface },
> 
> Please put the compatibles on another line and align data with them.
Ok, I will update it next version.

> 
> > +	{}
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int pl353_smc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct pl353_smc_data *pl353_smc;
> > +	struct device_node *child;
> > +	struct resource *res;
> > +	int err;
> > +	struct device_node *of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > +	void (*init)(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > +		     struct device_node *nand_node);
> > +	const struct of_device_id *match = NULL;
> > +
> > +	pl353_smc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pl353_smc), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!pl353_smc)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	/* Get the NAND controller virtual address */
> > +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > +	pl353_smc_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(pl353_smc_base))
> > +		return PTR_ERR(pl353_smc_base);
> > +
> > +	pl353_smc->aclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "aclk");
> > +	if (IS_ERR(pl353_smc->aclk)) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "aclk clock not found.\n");
> > +		return PTR_ERR(pl353_smc->aclk);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	pl353_smc->memclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "memclk");
> > +	if (IS_ERR(pl353_smc->memclk)) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "memclk clock not found.\n");
> > +		return PTR_ERR(pl353_smc->memclk);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	err = clk_prepare_enable(pl353_smc->aclk);
> > +	if (err) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to enable AXI clock.\n");
> > +		return err;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	err = clk_prepare_enable(pl353_smc->memclk);
> > +	if (err) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to enable memory clock.\n");
> > +		goto out_clk_dis_aper;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pl353_smc);
> > +
> > +	/* clear interrupts */
> > +	writel(PL353_SMC_CFG_CLR_DEFAULT_MASK,
> > +	       pl353_smc_base + PL353_SMC_CFG_CLR_OFFS);
> > +
> > +	/* Find compatible children. Only a single child is supported */
> > +	for_each_available_child_of_node(of_node, child) {
> > +		match = of_match_node(pl353_smc_supported_children, child);
> > +		if (!match) {
> > +			dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "unsupported child node\n");
> > +			continue;
> > +		}
> > +		break;
> > +	}
> > +	if (!match) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no matching children\n");
> > +		goto out_clk_disable;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	init = match->data;
> > +	if (init)
> > +		init(pdev, child);
> > +	of_platform_device_create(child, NULL, &pdev->dev);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +
> > +out_clk_disable:
> > +	clk_disable_unprepare(pl353_smc->memclk);
> > +out_clk_dis_aper:
> > +	clk_disable_unprepare(pl353_smc->aclk);
> > +
> > +	return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int pl353_smc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct pl353_smc_data *pl353_smc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +
> > +	clk_disable_unprepare(pl353_smc->memclk);
> > +	clk_disable_unprepare(pl353_smc->aclk);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Match table for device tree binding */
> > +static const struct of_device_id pl353_smc_of_match[] = {
> > +	{ .compatible = "arm,pl353-smc-r2p1" },
> > +	{ },
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pl353_smc_of_match);
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver pl353_smc_driver = {
> > +	.probe		= pl353_smc_probe,
> > +	.remove		= pl353_smc_remove,
> > +	.driver		= {
> > +		.name	= "pl353-smc",
> > +		.pm	= &pl353_smc_dev_pm_ops,
> > +		.of_match_table = pl353_smc_of_match,
> > +	},
> > +};
> > +
> > +module_platform_driver(pl353_smc_driver);
> > +
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Xilinx, Inc.");
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ARM PL353 SMC Driver");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/pl353-smc.h b/include/linux/platform_data/pl353-
> smc.h
> 
> I don't think you really need a separate file for these enums? Unless
> it is really platform specific?
The issue here is I have to include this in pl353_nand driver.
And I just referred " include/linux/platform_data/mtd-nand-pxa3xx.h", hence
I added like this.
> 
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..fc4129e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/pl353-smc.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * ARM PL353 SMC Driver Header
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2017 Xilinx, Inc
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef __LINUX_MEMORY_PL353_SMC_H
> > +#define __LINUX_MEMORY_PL353_SMC_H
> > +
> > +enum pl353_smc_ecc_mode {
> > +	PL353_SMC_ECCMODE_BYPASS = 0,
> > +	PL353_SMC_ECCMODE_APB = 1,
> > +	PL353_SMC_ECCMODE_MEM = 2
> > +};
> > +
> > +enum pl353_smc_mem_width {
> > +	PL353_SMC_MEM_WIDTH_8 = 0,
> > +	PL353_SMC_MEM_WIDTH_16 = 1
> > +};
> > +
> > +u32 pl353_smc_get_ecc_val(int ecc_reg);
> > +int pl353_smc_ecc_is_busy(void);
> > +int pl353_smc_get_nand_int_status_raw(void);
> > +void pl353_smc_clr_nand_int(void);
> > +int pl353_smc_set_ecc_mode(enum pl353_smc_ecc_mode mode);
> > +int pl353_smc_set_ecc_pg_size(unsigned int pg_sz);
> > +int pl353_smc_set_buswidth(unsigned int bw);
> > +#endif
> 
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
> 
> --
> Miquel Raynal, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com

Thanks,
Naga Sureshkumar Relli

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-19 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-06  7:49 [LINUX PATCH v9 0/4] Add arm pl353 smc memory and nand driver for xilinx zynq soc Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2018-06-06  7:49 ` [LINUX PATCH v9 1/4] Devicetree: Add pl353 smc controller devicetree binding information Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2018-06-07 15:42   ` Miquel Raynal
2018-06-07 15:47     ` Miquel Raynal
2018-06-08  5:20     ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2018-06-08  5:51       ` Boris Brezillon
2018-06-08  8:01         ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2018-06-08  7:23       ` Miquel Raynal
2018-06-06  7:49 ` [LINUX PATCH v9 2/4] memory: pl353: Add driver for arm pl353 static memory controller Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2018-06-07 16:07   ` Miquel Raynal
2018-06-19 10:54     ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli [this message]
2018-06-06  7:49 ` [LINUX PATCH v9 3/4] Documentation: nand: pl353: Add documentation for controller and driver Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2018-06-06  7:49 ` [LINUX PATCH v9 4/4] mtd: rawnand: pl353: Add basic driver for arm pl353 smc nand interface Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2018-06-07 19:59   ` Miquel Raynal
2018-06-08 12:23     ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli
2018-06-08 12:35       ` Miquel Raynal
2018-06-08 13:08         ` Naga Sureshkumar Relli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MWHPR02MB2623C67196CAFD239736B6A1AF700@MWHPR02MB2623.namprd02.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=nagasure@xilinx.com \
    --cc=ada@thorsis.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=honghui.zhang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=ladis@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=mmayer@broadcom.com \
    --cc=nagasureshkumarrelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=rogerq@ti.com \
    --cc=wmw2@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.