2) there is a lot of deletes.  Feels like this needs some additional eyes.  
Yes, this pull request is too dirty and should be ignored.
Please refer to the new pull request which squashed unnecessary commits and patched all together, as below:
https://github.com/openbmc/phosphor-host-ipmid/pull/55

1) sdbus already supports a get and set property so do not create your own
Actually my method is a wrapper to sd_bus API to get/set properties. It should be convenient for ipmid codes to handle with sd_bus API.

GOU, Peng Fei (¹¶Åô·É), Ph.D.
OpenPower Team.


Inactive hide details for Chris Austen---12/17/2015 12:01:11 PM---From: Chris Austen/Austin/IBM To: "Stewart Smith" <stewart@liChris Austen---12/17/2015 12:01:11 PM---From: Chris Austen/Austin/IBM To: "Stewart Smith" <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

From: Chris Austen/Austin/IBM
To: "Stewart Smith" <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peng Fei BG Gou/China/IBM@ibmcn, "OpenBMC Patches" <openbmc-patches@stwcx.xyz>, "openbmc" <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>
Date: 12/17/2015 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH phosphor-host-ipmid v3 2/6] Add get/set ipmid command support with correct DBUS property handling.





I'm very confused with this patch.  

1) sdbus already supports a get and set property so do not create your own

2) there is a lot of deletes.  Feels like this needs some additional eyes.  

Sent from my iPhone using IBM Verse


On Dec 16, 2015, 4:46:14 PM, "Stewart Smith" <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: